Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
正确答案是哪个?我选的A,请大家看看A哪里可能错?
我选了E,对不对啊?
I don't think this passage is to deny the government's goal, but to make some analysis of how to achieve the goal finally, even if making some changes of the practical strategy that may at last realize it.
I vote for D.
A: The goal is to preserve the land. The strategy is to purchase lands from farmers. It was the strategy, not the goal, that was considered ill-conceived. Therefore, A is wrong.
D:
The first present a goal – correct.
strategies for achieving which (goal) are being evaluated in the argument – correct.
the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. – correct. Here, the particular strategy is assisting the farmers to modernize their farms. This strategy is based on the second boldface that farmers will not sell their land.
E is not correct.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses. This part is OK.
the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future. This part is wrong. The argument was advocating the strategy to help farmers to retain their land, not to give up their land.
我选了E,对不对啊?
I don't think this passage is to deny the government's goal, but to make some analysis of how to achieve the goal finally, even if making some changes of the practical strategy that may at last realize it.
同意楼上对E的分析.
A: The goal is to preserve the land. The strategy is to purchase lands from farmers. It was the strategy, not the goal, that was considered ill-conceived. Therefore, A is wrong.
E :The first presents a goal that the argument endorses.But the argument said:That plan is ill-conceived.So E is not correct.
二狼兄. Do you see the difference?
The goal is to preserve the land. The plan is to purchase lands from farmers. So the first part of E is correct. But the second part is wrong.
选d
同问啊？？？
是D没错。
真的吗?
我也认为是B。这个Argument根本就没在支持第一句话的"goal"，最后那句话的意思是作者认为更加理智的做法是帮助农民提高技术，从而增加他们卖地给房产商的机会成本。这对那个goal来说本身是退而求其次的办法，goal要完全保留，房产商夺取的话是完全wipe out，折衷下来还不如让农民继续耕作。
E is not correct.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses. This part is OK.
the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future. This part is wrong. The argument was advocating the strategy to help farmers to retain their land, not to give up their land.
B不对，应该是D
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion. （文章重点不在论述这个goal能不能attain, 而是提出自己的particular strategy）
我是这样理解的：
环境保护组织想RESERVE土地，但是没有说服力，因为1.农民可以把地卖给出价更高的开发商 2. 农民从来不会卖地
第二点又推出如果农民让这些地UNMODERNIZED，那么他们就无法生活。可是大部分农民又没钱MODERNIZED。所以环境保护组织的STRATEGY是帮助农民MODERNIZED。
由此推出，这个结论是支持环境保护组织的
D 第一句话说的是环境保护组织的政策是个GOAL，但是被评价的GOAL（正确）
第二句话提供了依据支持一个特殊的政策，这个政策指的就是环境保护组织提出的策略。（正确）
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
The first present a goal the environmentalist want to achieve, and its two strategies are evaluated; One strategy is outbid the developer, which is unlikely; The other one is to help the farmer modernize their farmland. A conclusion is reached for choosing the second plan to achieve the goal. The second is a judgment on farmers’ reaction, judgment provide a basis for the advocacy of the second strategy. Without such basis, even if they are able to help the farmers modernize the farmland, the farmers will still sell the land to the residential developer and the environmentalist can not achieve their goal.
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
The passage says that not the goal, the plan, is ill convinced. The second is not an evidence rejecting the main goal, but form a basis for advocating the second strategy in achieve that goal
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
The passage did not endorses the goal but the second strategy. The second is not a situation the argument contends, but rather the basis in formation of the second argument.还是不明白B哪里错~
还是不明白B哪里错~
B.The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained
这个目标是可以实现的吧？
所以B错了
D 第一句话说的是环境保护组织的政策是个GOAL，但是被评价的GOAL（正确）
第二句话提供了依据支持一个特殊的政策，这个政策指的就是环境保护组织提出的策略。（正确）
D 不是这么理解的 应该是，第一部分present a goal------这个目标是preserve the land，注意仅仅是present the goal 而不是 evaluate the goal，事实上，评价的是那个strategies
第二部分中the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy---指的是作者支持 a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms这样的一个解决之道，那么the second is a judgment providing a basis中的basis就是说怎么去支持采取资助农民现代化农场的策略罗 自然就是首先保证耕地不被变卖
I vote for D.
A: The goal is to preserve the land. The strategy is to purchase lands from farmers. It was the strategy, not the goal, that was considered ill-conceived. Therefore, A is wrong.
D:
The first present a goal – correct.
strategies for achieving which (goal) are being evaluated in the argument – correct.
the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. – correct. Here, the particular strategy is assisting the farmers to modernize their farms. This strategy is based on the second boldface that farmers will not sell their land.
解释的真正到位，我本来也选A，自己想也想不通，阅读能力太差啦
我开始错选了E，感谢18楼解决了我的疑问，选E的同学请参照18楼。
i3like1105 发表于 2008-11-8 15:49
B不对，应该是DB. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the ...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
