ChaseDream

标题: gwd-27-20 [打印本页]

作者: cournot    时间: 2006-6-4 10:40
标题: gwd-27-20

Q20:Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.  The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:  despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.  This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  1. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.

  2. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
  3. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
  4. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.

  5. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.

答案D,我觉得A更有道理,因为the second是对 the first的反驳,而不是support 。


作者: jandjshi    时间: 2006-6-4 12:40

答案D,我觉得A更有道理,因为the second是对 the first的反驳,而不是support 。

A: the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim. 说的不正是support吗?

D: the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.  second是对reasoning的support. reasoning是对 the first的反驳. 不正是the second是对 the first的反驳吗?


作者: cournot    时间: 2006-6-4 13:22

谢谢啦


作者: pengfei1102    时间: 2006-6-14 15:18
  1. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.

  2. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.

d 和  e 有什么区别 ? 


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-14 15:18:08编辑过]

作者: Winbolin    时间: 2006-10-19 19:18
以下是引用jandjshi在2006-6-4 12:40:00的发言:

答案D,我觉得A更有道理,因为the second是对 the first的反驳,而不是support 。

A: the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim. 说的不正是support吗?

D: the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.  second是对reasoning的support. reasoning是对 the first的反驳. 不正是the second是对 the first的反驳吗?

不完全對.... A support 的claim 也是反對the first 的: ..."a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false" . 看看A 與D的差異在於

A. ..the second is "evidence" that has been cited by others in support of that "claim". (反對the first主張claim)

D. ..the second is "evidence" used to support the "reasoning’s contention"(反對支持the first原因)

 


作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-11-16 15:39

D20. GWD27-Q20:

Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.  The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:  despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.  This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

D: The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.

没看出来第二个bf怎么支持第一个结论的理由的


作者: 娜娜仁    时间: 2006-12-3 17:41

同小狗一样的问题啊~~求助


作者: hedge    时间: 2006-12-10 10:27

thanks


作者: heshaohua666    时间: 2006-12-12 14:59
同小狗一样
作者: 飞天猪piggy    时间: 2007-1-5 17:32

E为什么错?

 


作者: snoopydior    时间: 2007-7-13 17:24

D: The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.

D后半部分准确的说明second是支持作者的结论(争论Critics的claim的准确性),而不是支持first position(Critics的结论)


作者: snoopydior    时间: 2007-7-13 17:27

比较一下,d和e前半部分完全一样

注意first postion指的是critics的结论,即作者反对的结论

那么e中说second用来支持first postion(作者反对的结论)显然就错了,因为second是用来支持作者自己的观点的:)


作者: zhaike    时间: 2008-9-21 20:21
以下是引用snoopydior在2007-7-13 17:27:00的发言:

比较一下,d和e前半部分完全一样

注意first postion指的是critics的结论,即作者反对的结论

那么e中说second用来支持first postion(作者反对的结论)显然就错了,因为second是用来支持作者自己的观点的:)

first不是作者反对的,只是认为inadequate。后面观点是补充first position的。

vote fore e。因为first position后面的evidence都是为了support或者补充使它adequate的。


作者: gmat928    时间: 2010-3-9 22:56

D20. GWD27-Q20:


Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.  The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:  despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.  This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



D: The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.



没看出来第二个bf怎么支持第一个结论的理由的

-- by 会员 晴天小狗 (2006/11/16 15:39:00)



reasoning’s contention 不是“第一个结论的理由”,而是:This evidence is far from adequate。
作者: gmat928    时间: 2010-3-9 22:57
这个题的关键在于理解reasoning contends和reasoning’s contention

整个题目的内容就是一个reasoning,这个reasoning contends了一个contention,即Critics的观点证据不足(This evidence is far from adequate),并且给出了原因(since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built)。

我们看一下正确选项D
前半部分
The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence
分解意思应该为:
1、The first is a position
2、the reasoning contends that the first position is inadequately supported by the evidence
后半部分
the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
reasoning’s contention指的是整个reasoning的观点:This evidence is far from adequate

如果reasoning contends和reasoning’s contention都明确了意思,就清楚多了。

其他选项错误的地方标示如下:
A.    The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.
B.    The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the secondis a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
C.    The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
D.    The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
E.    The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.

作者: Aquariusmm89    时间: 2011-11-10 12:10
楼上说的真清楚~恩明白了,E错在第二句是支持第一句的,而其实第二句应该支持的是作者观点,而不是第一句~
作者: lemonsong    时间: 2013-1-28 00:47
D中reasoning contends:despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.E中that position:the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3