ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD26-17,这套问题挺多的 [打印本页]

作者: quanner    时间: 2006-5-28 19:40
标题: [求助]GWD26-17,这套问题挺多的

     GWD-26-Q17

Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A.     a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood

that a particular asteroid or comet may

B.     a scale that astronomers have developed rates how

likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to

C.    astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely

a particular asteroid or comet will be to

D.    astronomers have developed a scale for rating the

likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will

E.     astronomers have developed a scale that rates the

likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

此题答案是C,

我在C与D间选择,还是不确定

C中的will be to,太奇怪了

D的话,for rating 在这里没to rate好;还有形容词优于名词,这里的likelihood没C的likely 好

C中的be to去掉了,我就觉得很完美;

难道be to可以表示不确定的意思;可是石林说,be to表示主观意愿,在GMAT中,一般都是不对的啊!

晕了!

请NN指教!

 

 



作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-5-28 19:53
支持D。

C中will be to是大忌。D中for rating的确没有to rate好,但是likelyhood比C的likely好,因为rate及物动词需要一个动作对象,名词好。

作者: quanner    时间: 2006-5-28 19:56

rate

vt.
估价, 认为, 鉴定等级, 责骂
vi.
被评价, 责骂

对吗?

还有其他用法吗?

谢谢MM!


作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-5-28 20:14
GWD26大概做的人少,讨论帖也少,题目也有点乱七八糟的可能有typo错误,楼主mm你要相信自己的判断!
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-28 20:15:28编辑过]

作者: quanner    时间: 2006-5-28 20:19

谢谢MM

这套题太多题做得跟答案不一样

有很多看了答案还想不通

所以,想请大家帮帮忙了

 


作者: maxtan    时间: 2006-5-29 10:18

支持D,

will be to 太不好了

'for rating' is ok


作者: quanner    时间: 2006-5-29 12:33

3x

I see!


作者: gonghao    时间: 2006-5-29 14:54

D

C:will be to错误

will=be to都表将来


作者: 马尔代夫    时间: 2006-6-2 13:05
我选的D. that从句解释likehood. 因此E中likehood后的of是错误的.c就是will to be不好
作者: zhangla    时间: 2006-6-2 13:18
原文from New York Times:

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes
undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have
adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or
comet will collide with Earth.

Seems D is a better choice. "Will be to" used here is not correct IMO.

Some correct useage of "will be to":
The approach for Republicans to win 2006 mid-term election will be to define foes and change the subject.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-2 13:19:12编辑过]

作者: 谢沁薇    时间: 2006-6-4 16:47
D
作者: 二狼神    时间: 2006-6-5 14:23

C是对的:正常语序为a particular asteroid or comet will be  likely to ...

把likely调到句前让这句子显得有点怪,其实还是见得少.

我也选了D,不过D的意思错了,GMAT里就多这种SC.


作者: 香香茶    时间: 2006-6-6 11:20

觉得这题rate后面用名词比用从句好,另外,二狼神,你仔细看看,D的意思是没错的,因为都是在讨论可能性。我误选了E,是因为一直以为likelihood后面加of而非加that,实际上是我搞反了。

C中的will be to让人很难接受。因此我偏向D。


作者: 二狼神    时间: 2006-6-9 11:00

D:a scale for rating the likelihood that a articular asteroid or comet will

这里用would更好.

C是我们见得少,看看洋人写的东西很多都有这个用法的.

C是我们见得少,看看洋人写的东西很多都有这个用法的.


作者: lesterlau    时间: 2006-6-9 11:47
本来我也选D,但看完NN们说完后,我觉得C还是对的,will be likely to是正确的
作者: 香香茶    时间: 2006-6-9 13:39

-To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

from New York Times

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10917FE355A0C748EDDAE0894D1494D81

for your reference. D looks more like the original sentence, therefore should be the best answer.


作者: hawkinsxie    时间: 2006-6-9 14:36
D
作者: 二狼神    时间: 2006-6-9 16:22
这样看来,C由于把likely放在句前和how跟在一起,改变了句子的意思重心,反而是C要用would to be 才对了,而D的正常语序就可以不用would.呵呵,谢谢香香的独家秘笈.
作者: bluetea    时间: 2006-7-21 05:59
up
作者: liaijun_2001    时间: 2006-8-10 07:06
应该是C,关于will be to 可以参看二狼神的解释
作者: jiaxuan    时间: 2006-9-24 14:36
个人也觉得C的说法有点怪,因为如果按照上述讨论,C的正常语序是a particular asteroid or comet will be likely to....这里这个will be就很别扭,如果是are还好些,因为我觉得will和likely有点意思差不多的嫌疑
作者: findjuhl    时间: 2006-10-1 15:21

倾向选C

D的for rating表示目的,是典型错误,应该用to rate替换

C的likely被提前,没有错误。


作者: 马尔代夫    时间: 2006-10-1 15:36
D
作者: andy_rds    时间: 2006-10-3 16:32

我在做题的时候也选的D, 不过分析了一下觉得还是倾向于 C

如果 D 改成如下, 那肯定选D
astronomers have developed a scale to rate the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

C 其实从语法的角度来讲没有问题,正如二郎神说的
正常语序为a particular asteroid or comet will be  likely to collide with Earth. 这里作为从句则变成答案 C
astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to collide with Earth


作者: Cafe    时间: 2006-10-7 23:59

有沒有人覺得C的句意上會不會有點奇怪

感覺C的意思好像是"只"去rate how likely "a particular asteroid or comet" will be to.......

好像只針對某一個似的!!

(還是我的錯覺,看半天看不出所以然來,有點暈了)


作者: dcatcher    时间: 2006-10-20 06:03
我也倾向C, C中的说法好像没什么问题, to rate...在这里做developed a scale的目的状语. 但D中的for rating是致命伤,目的状语不用for doing sth.的形式表达. NY TIMES中的例句是that引导的定语从句,与D中的for rating有本质的不同. 希望大家多讨论指正.
作者: 111cara    时间: 2006-10-23 00:10

我想问一下,may这种情态词可以省略或者替换吗

或者是因为这里的may与likelihood重复了?

超级菜鸟提问!!

 


作者: linda816    时间: 2006-10-24 03:20
恩,我也觉得C应该是正确的。
作者: smileday    时间: 2006-10-24 11:00

in C, the sentence should be modified into " a particular asteroid or comet will (be to ) collide with Earth.", at the same time, without changing the meaning of the sentence.

"be to" is unnecessary here.

so, D is best.


作者: xiangqinzh    时间: 2006-10-29 20:29

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth;

Comets - News - Science - The New York Times - [ 翻译此页 BETA ]
   
Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth; new scale described ...
topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/comets/index.html?offset=50& - 52k -


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-25 21:20:19编辑过]

作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-11-12 14:10

不行了 顶起来

模考的时候选的C; how likely...will be是一个成分,和后面的to没关系,应该没错

nn请


作者: yboo    时间: 2006-11-13 13:49
12楼和22楼解释的很清楚了啊。  原始语序是“...  will be likely to ...”

至于google上可以查到报纸上的原文,我不觉得这个可以作为依据。个人感觉,GMAT要求的语法非常严格。很多它认为不严谨的表述方式,实际上都可以在google上查到应用实例。

just my 2 cents.

作者: xiangqinzh    时间: 2006-12-25 21:16

DDD


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-25 21:18:38编辑过]

作者: cccccc0    时间: 2007-1-5 15:43
likely to~~支持C!!
作者: jsj_gill    时间: 2007-1-6 22:44

越看越晕啊~~,虽然倾向选C

但,D中如果反for rating 改为 to rate行不行呢?


作者: smoker    时间: 2007-1-21 02:59
C是对的:

1.正常语序为a particular asteroid or comet will be  likely to ...
2.develope sth  to do 也正确


作者: ivypp    时间: 2007-2-23 01:26
原来选D,现在倾向C多一点。。
作者: abort    时间: 2007-2-23 04:10
c吧,d中likelihood that。。that引导同位语从句,但是that之后的内容不能做likelihood的同位语
作者: smoker    时间: 2007-3-4 01:14
现在觉得e对
1.有likelyhood,不用how likely
2.e保留了原文的情态动词
3。无大错误,a scale that,likelyhood  of..表从属

作者: chenyudi    时间: 2007-3-19 15:14

还是支持C,LIKELY前置

be likely to没有问题, 与will一起也不重复


作者: bigpotato82    时间: 2007-4-28 05:29

ding


作者: elithian    时间: 2007-4-28 20:24

赞成C.

develop sth. to do比develop sth. for doing更合理

C的意思是will be, to...,to

It's likely for sth.(....will be) to do


作者: chamcham    时间: 2007-6-18 14:57

vote for D. never see be to do correct.


作者: mygk    时间: 2007-7-21 21:10

我认为C是正确的。

C中的will be to collide不等于will be to do,而后者是典型的错误

前者其实是倒装:to rate how likely a ... to collide with Earthe will be

how引导宾语从句,从句中a particular asteroid or comet是主语, to collide with earth是主语的定语。

will be是宾语从句谓语

大家讨论,不知理解是否正确


作者: mygk    时间: 2007-7-21 21:18

我认为C是正确的。

C中的will be to collide不等于will be to do,而后者是典型的错误

前者其实是倒装:to rate how likely a ... to collide with Earthe will be

how引导宾语从句,从句中a particular asteroid or comet是主语, to collide with earth是主语的定语。

will be是宾语从句谓语

大家讨论,不知理解是否正确


作者: gylucia    时间: 2007-7-31 22:51
up
作者: ikkoku    时间: 2007-8-17 00:47

我同意C,不过我理解是likely倒装,应该是how a ...... will be likely to collide with Earth.

还有表达目的应该用 develop sth to do(开发 sth 用来 do), 而不是 develop sth for doing; 以前的题目中的确出现过for doing的正确选项,不过好像都是provide support/evidence for doing (为....提供支持/依据), 如GWD21-Q21。 所以D选项的 for doing 在这里好像有些不妥。

欢迎大家继续讨论。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-17 0:49:48编辑过]

作者: llxx1985cn    时间: 2007-8-20 09:14
up
作者: chanx_ceci    时间: 2007-8-23 14:34
up
作者: wsdoll    时间: 2007-9-16 15:31
up
作者: Ironpanda    时间: 2007-9-23 18:32
支持D,,,,5555  还好,没有被他们搞晕掉
作者: snowofjune    时间: 2007-12-9 05:53
why not E?

作者: eileenmu木    时间: 2008-3-23 09:46

还是选C


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-23 9:55:44编辑过]

作者: dan2007    时间: 2008-3-31 04:20
up
作者: 兔斯基    时间: 2008-4-25 16:41

支持D

for也是可以的吧,下面这题

New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’ skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying
   Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

A.      provide compelling support for classifying

B.       provide compelling support for the classification of

C.      provides compelling support to the classification of

D.      provides compelling support for classifying

E.       provides compelling support to classify

查了一下scale for的用法,New York Times

Dr. Tetsuya Fujita, a meteorologist who devised the standard scale for rating the severity of tornadoes and discovered the role of sudden violent down-bursts of air that sometimes cause airplanes to crash, died on Thursday at his home in Chicago.

而且D是最接近原文的。

原文from New York Times:
To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted
a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

原文from New York Times:
To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted
a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

大家讨论


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-25 16:58:20编辑过]

作者: ll_zl    时间: 2008-4-26 00:32

支持D,其中for的用法很明显是做为scale的定语修饰,表scale的用途的,从time的原文上也可以看出这个用法(time原文中是用that来修饰scale的,所以ets改为for来迷惑大家)。


作者: tsaibh2001    时间: 2008-7-29 01:12

稍微瀏覽了一下大家過去的討論 怎麼沒人選E呢

請問 E哪裡不好


作者: yzysoly528    时间: 2008-9-9 18:40
up
作者: 吴羽若    时间: 2008-12-15 16:27
以下是引用二狼神在2006-6-5 14:23:00的发言:

C是对的:正常语序为a particular asteroid or comet will be  likely to ...

把likely调到句前让这句子显得有点怪,其实还是见得少.

我也选了D,不过D的意思错了,GMAT里就多这种SC.

这样看就对了,还是C最好.


作者: arritty    时间: 2008-12-15 19:51

应该是C 不要再看那个什么所谓的原文和谁接近,既然有不一样,差一个单词就不能以它为标准了啊,那个"原文"里用的是likelyhood不代表有likelyhood 的选项就对啊,仔细体会todo和for doing 会觉得他们有很大不同,前者是in order to的意思比较多,后者更倾向于"为了```提供```"对象是一个整体而少是一个动作,反正就是感觉了我也不知道自己说清楚没有,

再者C 的语序是杨鹏难句里常说的倒装拉`~看惯了就不觉得怪了.在读这个句子的时候在will be那里停顿一下就会觉得顺多了

所以支持C ~


作者: songlovegt    时间: 2009-4-21 03:29
支持45和47楼,是倒装
发贴心情

    

我认为C是正确的。

C中的will be to collide不等于will be to do,而后者是典型的错误

前者其实是倒装:to rate how likely a ... to collide with Earthe will be

how引导宾语从句,从句中a particular asteroid or comet是主语, to collide with earth是主语的定语。

will be是宾语从句谓语




作者: bluebus0831    时间: 2009-5-7 20:46
up
作者: Eliott    时间: 2009-5-22 13:11
up
作者: zyjzyj    时间: 2009-5-22 15:48

这题真的很搞, 都好几年了.

in my view:

C对, develop a scale in order to rate.

D的"for rating"不对.


作者: crystal007    时间: 2009-5-23 21:28
我也支持选C
作者: jean1280    时间: 2009-6-30 17:46
UP
作者: Liu_leaf    时间: 2009-6-30 23:25

for doing不做目的状语的时候是不需要改为to do不定式的,这里只是for doing只是进一步说明scale,“针对rate...的scale”,跟GWD之前有个evidence provided support for doing是一样的;

C选项的be likely to do sth是没有问题的,但是错误在will,be likely to do已经含有将来的意思了,不需要再使用will了,我好像没有见过will be likely to do sth的结构,寡闻了。此题我之前也犹豫了很久,昨天突然想到,望指正! 


作者: coney8813    时间: 2009-8-29 19:38

我感觉这题C D两个选项语法上都没问题,C中的will be to 其实就是will be likely to ,D中的for doing 也没问题,因为正如楼上所说的  跟GWD之前有个evidence provided support for doing是一样的,

所以应该是那个更好的选择,还望NN 解答,为何C比D更好


作者: nancia    时间: 2009-9-3 15:54
同问
作者: arealjc    时间: 2009-9-5 21:22
以下是引用coney8813在2009/8/29 19:38:00的发言:

我感觉这题C D两个选项语法上都没问题,C中的will be to 其实就是will be likely to ,D中的for doing 也没问题,因为正如楼上所说的  跟GWD之前有个evidence provided support for doing是一样的,

所以应该是那个更好的选择,还望NN 解答,为何C比D更好

provide...for...是固定搭配,并不意味着表示目的可以用for doing,所以D在这点上不如C


作者: VeniceBingo    时间: 2009-9-23 17:25
以下是引用zyjzyj在2009/5/22 15:48:00的发言:

这题真的很搞, 都好几年了.

in my view:

C对, develop a scale in order to rate.

D的"for rating"不对.

ding

C应该是将likely前置了.为了强调likely,GMAT最喜欢这样写句子,OG里面到处都是这样的

D的for rating 不好.

前面有MM搬出原文驳C,但是原文用的是that rates,rate 用做动词,怎么都比动名好吧,


作者: serendipityh    时间: 2009-9-23 21:19
完全赞同楼上的MM 所说,



To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes
undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have
adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or
comet will collide with Earth.



ETS真会耍花招!! 不愧是ETS!



Responding to
the public’s fascination with-and sometimes undue alarm over-possible
threats from asteroids, astronomers have developed a scale for rating
the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with
Earth.



这两个句子完全不同. 和楼上MM 说的一样



如果加for 就成了a scale 专门用来rating...的. 意思不好



还有12楼的二郎神同学说的对, 这是倒装.



给大家两个Nytimes 的例子:



1. I wonder how easy it will be to tell that these puzzles come from true veterans



2. Ben S. Bernanke’s biggest challenge will be to undo much of what made him a hero during his first term.



由此可见will be to 貌似组合但非组合,



第一句: it would be easy to do sth



it would be biggest challenge to do sth



to do 是和后面一起的!!!

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/23 21:22:17编辑过]

作者: charles1124    时间: 2009-10-7 15:43

what about E?


作者: foreverlei    时间: 2009-10-18 01:34
晕了 能不能说下E为何错?谢了...

作者: TheAssembly    时间: 2009-10-18 23:08
以下是引用foreverlei在2009/10/18 1:34:00的发言:
晕了 能不能说下E为何错?谢了...

LIKELIHOOD和MAY意思重复,从上面的选项可以感觉出来


作者: silvia03    时间: 2010-10-7 13:26
manhattangmat 上有讨论这道题的帖子,RonPurewal 老师说选D.
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/responding-to-the-public-s-fascination-with-and-sometimes-t8246.html

摘录如下:
(d) is the best answer, although (c) is not too far behind.
i can see that (c) is unacceptably informal / casual, and maybe even unidiomatic, but i can only see that because i'm a seasoned writer and reader of formal english.

for those of you who are not native speakers of english - the best approach to problems such as this one is:
* note the differences in usage between the formal and informal
    - e.g., "rate how likely" vs. "rate the likelihood that..."
* remember what these differences look like, so that you can make similar distinctions in the future.
(e) is wrong, since you can't use both "likelihood" and "may"... redundancy.

shri312 wrote:

Ron,
Doesn't answer Choice " E "states the scale itself rates the likelihood of a asteroid?

yes, that's another problem -- an asteroid itself doesn't have a "likelihood".  good find.
i.e., only EVENTS have a "likelihood".  an asteroid is a physical object, not an event, so it makes no sense to speak of its "likelihood".
--------------------------------------------------------------------
hello
 could you please explain whether phrase 'developed a scale for rating ' is correct .
 I thought correct choice of words would be 'developed a scale to rate '
 thanks in advance

It's because the author intends the purpose (rate something) to be more closely related to the scale than the development process.  It's a "scale for rating"; either one can be used correctly depending on the author's preference.  lease keep in mind that just because one answer choice is correct doesn't mean that EVERYTHING that's different about another choice is wrong.  Sometimes the GMAT tosses out a split that just doesn't matter (although this is far less common than splits that matter)..
作者: zuoanyuyu    时间: 2013-4-4 23:11
我认为 D 正确,C 中的 to do 有表达 主语 astronomers 来 rate 的意思 ,而从原句中不能看出是谁在 rate ,可能是 astronomers ,也可能是其他人呢




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3