请各位NN帮帮忙，资质太愚钝了。。汗。。96 Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
The commentator's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
(B) No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
(C) Trade disputes should be settled by international tribunal.
(D) For the two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
(E) Countries close their markets to foreigners to protect domestic producers.
OG explanation:
Argument construction
Situation: The theory of trade retaliation is explained as the action and reaction of closing markets between trading nations; no country would ever trade with another, the observation is offered, if every country acted according to the theory.
Reasoning: What assumption underlies this argument? What makes the commentator conclude that no country would be trading if the theory were operative? The commentator must perceive of some condition as a given here. The argument assumes an initial action, a country's closing of a market to a trading partner, that is followed by a reaction, the retaliatory closing of a market by that partner. In this unending pattern of action-reaction, at least one of the two countries must have a market closed to the other.
A Any one country may act according to the theory, but not every country.
B The argument assumes that countries do block markets to foreign trade.
C An international tribunal is not mentioned in the argument.
D Correct. This statement properly identifies the assumption required to create the never-ending action-reaction pattern.
E The argument does not discuss the protection of domestic trade.
The correct answer is D
我的问题是，我看不懂题干的意思，我不是经济商科类背景的，哪位好心人能帮我解释一下这句话隐含的经济规律？
The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets.
我的问题是，我看不懂题干的意思，我不是经济商科类背景的，哪位好心人能帮我解释一下这句话隐含的经济规律？
我的问题是，我看不懂题干的意思，我不是经济商科类背景的，哪位好心人能帮我解释一下这句话隐含的经济规律？
The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets.
The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets.
我也没学过这东东, 试着翻易一下.
贸易报复的理论表明那些被关闭了出口市场的国家应该也关闭它的进口市场,为了向那些国家施加压力从而使其重新开放进口市场.
就是说:如国一个国家被人制裁不能出口了,那么它就会相应的也关闭它的进口市场也不进口那些国家的产品.就是一种报复行为.
关于这一题的选项都还是很容易排除的，但是我有个疑问是关于A选项OG的解释，
A No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
解释：Any one country may act according to the theory, but not every country.
这个解释是什么意思？题干不是已经说了If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other. 这个选项是直接与题干矛盾的，不明白它的解释有什么意义？？但是如果大胆假设A选项本来是说Every country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.的话就MAKE SENSE了。。狂汗。。难道ETS把题出错了。。 请各位NN帮帮忙，资质太愚钝了。。汗。。
关于这一题的选项都还是很容易排除的，但是我有个疑问是关于A选项OG的解释，
A No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
解释：Any one country may act according to the theory, but not every country.
这个解释是什么意思？题干不是已经说了If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other. 这个选项是直接与题干矛盾的，不明白它的解释有什么意义？？但是如果大胆假设A选项本来是说Every country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.的话就MAKE SENSE了。。狂汗。。难道ETS把题出错了。。 请各位NN帮帮忙，资质太愚钝了。。汗。。
My understanding is that as long as you know that choice A is the opposite of the argument, there is no need to study too much about why. To me, CR is different from SC that as long as you understand how to get the correct answer, why bother to distract youself from the real feel of OG.
关于这一题的选项都还是很容易排除的，但是我有个疑问是关于A选项OG的解释，
A No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
解释：Any one country may act according to the theory, but not every country.
这个解释是什么意思？题干不是已经说了If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other. 这个选项是直接与题干矛盾的，不明白它的解释有什么意义？？但是如果大胆假设A选项本来是说Every country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.的话就MAKE SENSE了。。狂汗。。难道ETS把题出错了。。 请各位NN帮帮忙，资质太愚钝了。。汗。。
哈，刚看到mbz的建议，觉得很有道理，还是放过自己一马吧
我也是对A的解释有疑问
NN告诉我，这到底是啥意思呀？不弄懂难受呀
我也有同样的疑问，有哪位大牛帮忙解释一下吗
文章说一个【出口市场被某国家】关闭的国家会采取【关闭对该国家开放的出口市场】以逼迫其重新开放市场。如果所有的国家都这样做，那样就没有贸易可言了。
问假设
A：没有国家采取这样的理论。那就是说明大家都不睬用这样的做法。如果大家都不采用，贸易还是在的。
因此是至少要有一家，随便哪一家都行，采取这样的政策，才能产生解释里说的action-reaction的循环。
Any one country may act according to the theory, but not every country
任何一个国家都可能根据这个理论行事，但是不能大家都这样的做，如果都这样的做的话，就没有开始了，结论就不存在了。
96 Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
The commentator's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
(B) No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
(C) Trade disputes should be settled by international tribunal.
(D) For the two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
(E) Countries close their markets to foreigners to protect domestic producers.
原文的意思是：trade retaliation （贸易复仇论，哈哈，自己起的）说如果一个国家对另一个国家关闭了自己的一部分市场，那么对方的国家就会抱复性的关闭自己的一部分市场，来逼迫那个国家从新打开市场。（大概是这意思）
A 没有国家会按照这个理论做（做不作是它自己的事，无关）
B没有国家应该关闭市场（应不应该人家才不管，无关）
C应该由...来解决（无关）
D对于两个国家，至少有一个国家会对其他国家关闭市场
D 国家关闭市场是为了保护自我。（管你什么目的呢，反正就是关了又怎么了，无关）
所以选D，只有这个前提，国家之间的市场才会恶性循环的关闭下去，最终都像大清国一样闭关自守了
the conclusion is "If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other. "
如果没有一个market被closed的话，就算every country acted according to this theory, 但是因为没有任何一个market is closed out,也就不会导致all the countries retaliate each other that results in all the trading to be closed out. 所以要推出上面的结论no country traded with each other，必须有至少一个market是已经被closed掉的。
3x
96 Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
这里的 closed out 是被动吗？ 我只是有一点不明白country 还可以被close out 的？不是markets 被close的吗？
哪位NN帮忙解释一下吧。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |