ChaseDream

标题: OG21,在别人帖子下面问没人理,只好再开一个 [打印本页]

作者: FionaLiang    时间: 2006-5-20 16:24
标题: OG21,在别人帖子下面问没人理,只好再开一个

OG21

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

答案:B

大概的翻译应该是这样的吧:

以下是引用kid在2004-2-8 1:25:00的发言:(http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=36591&page=1

辩护律师有时会辩解说他客户(那些罪犯)干坏事是因为对一些下咽了的东西的反应,但是当犯罪或违法行为被定性为食物过敏时候,罪犯被告知他们对他们的行为不负责任。

我的问题是,ETS为什么要在这里用但是(but)呢?前后意思挺一致的呀,看不出什么转折呀...


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-20 16:25:13编辑过]

作者: allen0018    时间: 2006-5-20 17:34
BUT 不一定表示转折,往往是美国人说话的口头废话,相当于然而,可是,没有必要关注它---GRE 阅读精解,P-13
作者: FionaLiang    时间: 2006-5-20 19:34
嗯!谢谢!
作者: LQMM    时间: 2006-5-21 05:58

这道题是个什么逻辑啊!我不懂。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3