ChaseDream

标题: G-prep 雇佣成本上升 [打印本页]

作者: shuhao2353 时间: 2006-5-17 14:56
标题: G-prep 雇佣成本上升

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A, less than they did

B, less than it did

C, less than they were

D, lower than

E, lower than they were

BCE中的it / were / were皆错

AD比较，就是搞不清costs该用less 还是lower修饰，如可以用lower，D的省略是否妥当？

请NN指点！

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 15:37

比较的烟雾单一些

比较的成份是percent或者说是上涨的幅度，而不是比较“上涨”本身

今年的 precent和去年的比较

D省掉了precent

前面是percent in the 12 months that ended in September

后面是precent in in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

precent重复，省了

作者: Kevinlu 时间: 2006-5-17 15:38
我觉得cost用low 或 high

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 16:24

这里比较的不是costs

而是costs今年和去年的上涨程度

用high

作者: shuhao2353 时间: 2006-5-17 16:28

gonghao的意思是percent less than percent,对吧?

如果是A cost some money. 就要lower than B do了，cost和cost比，有lower对吧？

顺便问几个和percent / percentage有关的主谓一致问题，

one percent of the students

two percent of the stuents

large percentages of students

分别应该跟单数还是复数谓语？如students前面的the去掉有没有影响？

two percent of water又该如何跟？

请NN指点！

作者: shuhao2353 时间: 2006-5-17 16:30

sorry，忘记说了，那到题目软件给出的答案是A

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 16:49

那就是我错了

再研究研究

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 16:59

我犯错了

sthA did sthB in 1970 is lower than that/those did in 1980

即使是名词也得有代词：

sth is bigger in 1970 than that （is）in 1980

Bob made greater success in 1970 than he did in 1980

是我犯得错，随意得省略

面壁～～～～

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 17:02

换句话说如果是precent的比较的话，

起码也得有代词，that/it

这里意思上是程度的比较，这点是正确的

costs只是这个Employment costs名词的一部分而已，是主语+动词rise的过去式rose

所以did是必须补齐的

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-17 17:02:39编辑过]

作者: shuhao2353 时间: 2006-5-17 21:11
答楼上，我觉得A补did肯定没错，D中的省略肯定也不好，关键是lower和less在这里怎么判.那一个是correctiveness的错误，省略还是lower/less搭配

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 21:42

they(costs) did(补齐)

完全可以锁定A

作者: kathy8446 时间: 2006-9-4 20:56

不明白……

这题应该是上升的percentage比较没错，到底用lower还是less合适呢？不过上升lower，好像也不大通。但是感觉less也不好，比数字应该是small/great。

另外我到不觉得这里省略错了。Costs rose 2.8%.感觉是个主谓结构,2.8%应该不算宾语，更多有点副词的感觉吧？（概念不大清，如果错误请大家一定指出）如果是这样的话，就不用补出助动词啦。

以下是引用gonghao在2006-5-17 17:02:00的发言：

换句话说如果是precent的比较的话，

起码也得有代词，that/it

代词必须补出吗？？好像也见过省略得很干净的题目啊，如XYGWD1-16

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

a greater proportion than it was
a greater proportion than
a greater proportion than they have been
which is greater than was so
which is greater than it has been

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-4 21:00:40编辑过]

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-9-5 08:44

看自己5月的帖子真是。。。。。。对不起观众了

这题其实挺明显的

前面是 costs rose

后面用 they 指代costs

did 应对 rose

A很好的答案

D，lower than后面没有东西

－－－－－－－－－－－－－

这里用high不合适

因为如果是具体的数字的话，可以使用high 和low

但是这里是上升了2.8，即成本上升的幅度，这里用more和less来做比较

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-9-5 08:58

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A.a greater proportion than it was

B.a greater proportion than

C.a greater proportion than they have been

D.which is greater than was so

E.which is greater than it has been

-----------------------------------

我是说如果这里是在比较precent的话，显然这里不是

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

对于这个题我不是很满意答案

A，it 指代costs

B.没有不出，OG里众多的例子都是补出的

C：时态不大对，虽然很像答案

D/E就不讨论了，非限制定从也出来了

作者: kathy8446 时间: 2006-9-5 22:01

对，上升幅度确实用“多/少，甚至是大/小”比较合适，low/high不合适。这个应该是这题关键所在

不过关于省略，我还是觉得只要没有歧义，省略是好的

谢谢gonghao版版解答：）

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)