A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, posibly resulting from increasing sea surface tempretures during the same period.
A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, posibly resulting from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, posibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling posibly as a result of increasing
D/E:没用that引导，明显错，此略
A的错是否因为
1,suffer from后要跟名词，所以分词dwindling不妥？
2, resulting要修饰dwindling，所以不能用逗号逗开，否则就变成状语修饰suffer了？
3、resulting from后要接名词，所以不可用increasing，而应该用increase?
C的错也比较明显，用because of + n. + which clause不如直接用because clause来得简洁？
这里还有啥考点？请NN揭发：）
as a result of 作为结果，
难道食物的减少导致的creatures of the seabed suffering，从而导致了海洋表面温度的升高这样的结果？
感觉A说的通
海洋表面温度的升高导致了食物供给的减少从而导致了 seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies
大家讨论吧
请问这一体的答案是B吗？
我一开始也选了A，但是我觉得可能B在某一点更说得通，那就是，前面的现象result from 海平面温度的升高 而不是海平面升高的温度，如果a和b都没有其他语法错误可挑的话那么B更说得通一些。
不知道这样理解可不可以，继续讨论！！！
答楼上，给出答案是B，
我觉得hannah说的有道理，a还可能有歧义，b更明确
resulting from：由。。。导致
as a result of：作为结果
suffering from ，遭受。。。。。。
A，海床底部的creatures 正遭受dwindling food supplies，而这些是由于。。。。导致的
B，that creatures of the seabed 正在受苦因为缺少事物供给，possibly as a result of an increase in可能海洋表面温度升高是一个结果
creatures of the seabed 正在受苦因为缺少事物供给，能够导致“海洋表面温度升高”这个结果吗？
你觉的说的通吗？
我觉的是这样：海洋表面温度的升高－－－》食物供给减少－－－－》creatures of the seabed 正在受苦
而不是
【食物供给减少－－－－》creatures of the seabed 正在受苦】整件事情－－－》海洋表面温度的升高
我觉的B讲不通，没有逻辑意思
b更明确？？？？
could you please share your view or explanantion with us about CHOICE B？
楼上理解as a result of 可能有偏差，A....， as a result of B 意思是A作为B的结果，B是因A是果
查了朗文
谢谢楼上
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |