ChaseDream

标题: OG1,一个以前帖子中没有的问题 [打印本页]

作者: FionaLiang    时间: 2006-5-16 23:43
标题: OG1,一个以前帖子中没有的问题

1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.
            
A. occurring when a child
B. occurring when children
C. that occurred when a child
D. that occurred when they were children
E. that has occurred as each was a child

Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as.
Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.

请问,E选项的each为什么不能指men and women?

理解成“men and mowen中的每一个”不行吗?

也就是说如果有个选项是:that occurred when each was a child ,当他们每一个都是孩子的时候

可以吗??


作者: gonghao    时间: 2006-5-17 08:57

E选项的each为什么不能指men and women?

each 要这样用的话,一定要家of sb/them

因为men and women是复数概念,一定要指每一个的话,起码得有of


作者: FionaLiang    时间: 2006-5-17 09:56

    

再次谢谢gonghao!!

我已经把你的话记在本子里了!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-17 9:58:01编辑过]





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3