ChaseDream

标题: [求助]PREP中的一道题目 [打印本页]

作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-16 16:02
标题: [求助]PREP中的一道题目

大家帮我看看这道题目是什么意思啊,我怎么看不懂正确选项呢?答案是C

 

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito’s buildings from the buses’ exhaust will diminish significantly

Which of the following ,if true,most strongly supports the arugments?

A The exhaust from Palitito’s few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito’s buildings

B Palitilo’s Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust

C Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito thransporting passengers form one site to another.

D More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by other single means of transportation

E Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitioto while their passengers are visiting a site


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-16 16:21:02编辑过]

作者: 二狼神    时间: 2006-5-16 21:04

这题的选项出得很好.

C很绕,拐弯抹角地说车子跑得少,言外之意就是车子不跑的时间多,停在车场里的机会多了,对原文的因果进行了加强.

E是最大的干扰项,这题只要会排除E就可以选出C.把E作一下改动,比如不要SOME, 把unable to find改写一下, 那么E的支持作用还是有的.但因为有了C,E一般要以这种面目出现,也是很讨人厌的了.


作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-16 21:57

是啊,我正是选了E。C选项怎么看也觉得很怪。

明白你的意思了也就是说CE都有支持作用,但是C>E

多谢啊。


作者: 二狼神    时间: 2006-5-17 17:58

E没有支持,是无关.正确的支持项只能有一个.

如果是问假设,就有可能同时出现支持的,那种情况就很多了.


作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-5-17 18:12
楼主为什么觉得E对呢?找不着趴位的车只好在城里兜圈子,这个如果不是跟文章推理无关的话也应该是weaken啊,说明parking没用呗——当然,我觉得E是无关,削弱也只是勉强搭边儿而已。
作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-17 22:18
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-5-17 18:12:00的发言:
楼主为什么觉得E对呢?找不着趴位的车只好在城里兜圈子,这个如果不是跟文章推理无关的话也应该是weaken啊,说明parking没用呗——当然,我觉得E是无关,削弱也只是勉强搭边儿而已。

文中的句子:There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

因为车位少,所以大部分车子都在路边闲置,产生和驾驶时一样的废气,所以我认为 E 兜圈子也会产生废气,那么停车的计划好。我是这样推理的啊。


作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-5-18 19:28
如果这样的话,兜圈儿的车产生的废气也并不影响那些建筑啊,只是污染了城市环境,也是跟题目无关呀。

反正,做逻辑题切忌自己主观臆断,别想得太深,直接跟文章相关就行。我自己也不能做到这一点
作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-18 22:29
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-5-18 19:28:00的发言:
如果这样的话,兜圈儿的车产生的废气也并不影响那些建筑啊,只是污染了城市环境,也是跟题目无关呀。

反正,做逻辑题切忌自己主观臆断,别想得太深,直接跟文章相关就行。我自己也不能做到这一点
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.

MM请看文章的第一句话就是说废气破坏那些建筑啊,E怎么会是无关呢?


作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-5-18 23:34
车停在古迹建筑附近,产生的废气会伤害建筑物;车开走了,废气就只是污染环境了呀~
作者: ncyellow    时间: 2006-5-18 23:38
以下是引用司香尉在2006-5-16 16:02:00的发言:

大家帮我看看这道题目是什么意思啊,我怎么看不懂正确选项呢?答案是C

 

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito’s buildings from the buses’ exhaust will diminish significantly

Which of the following ,if true,most strongly supports the arugments?

A The exhaust from Palitito’s few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito’s buildings

B Palitilo’s Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust

C Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito thransporting passengers form one site to another.

D More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by other single means of transportation

E Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitioto while their passengers are visiting a site

原问中红色部分,很干扰,
废气污染建筑物是因为车停在建筑物时间长,所以C是比较贴近的选择



作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-18 23:39
我终于明白我理解错在哪里了,我误以为idling produces as much exhaust as driving是说停在路边产生的废气和开车产生的废气破坏一样大了,其实是说废气一样多,但是破坏不一样。多谢rosmarine一直孜孜不倦的教导我!
作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-18 23:41
原问中红色部分,很干扰,
废气污染建筑物是因为车停在建筑物时间长,所以C是比较贴近的选择

是是,我彻底明白了,多谢指导!


作者: zxzhyzcy    时间: 2007-6-14 22:58
以下是引用司香尉在2006-5-16 16:02:00的发言:

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito’s buildings from the buses’ exhaust will diminish significantly

Which of the following ,if true,most strongly supports the arugments?

A The exhaust from Palitito’s few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito’s buildings

B Palitilo’s Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust

C Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito thransporting passengers form one site to another.

D More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by other single means of transportation

E Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitioto while their passengers are visiting a site


我也觉得E无关,但是有不同的想法,Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.说明不管是driving还是idling的exhaust都对建筑物产生了破坏作用。

停车场解决的是部分idling buses的问题,E中的driving buses与此无关,因为没有停车位置的buses不管是继续idling还是drive around Palitioto 都产生了废气破坏建筑物,C说明有一部分idling buses不再idling而产生废气,所以降低了破坏建筑物的废气量。

说的不好,请见谅~


作者: hexiaobo110    时间: 2007-6-14 23:17

E选项中有明显的错误信号 SOME,这个单词本身就有很多意思可以理解,造成结论的不严密


作者: MangoQQ    时间: 2007-6-15 06:10
啊呀! 我刚做这道题,也给TRICK了一下, 哎...还是技术不纯熟啊. 惭愧...
作者: MangoQQ    时间: 2007-6-15 06:17

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.  There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled不能动() at the curb路边 during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.  The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?

 

(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.

(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting
            passengers from one site to another.  driving
的时间少(间接说其实那些bus停在路边制造的废气比开车时的多的多),所以如果有parking lot 就避免了idling, 从而减少了汽车对buildingexhaust.

(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.

(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site. 干扰选项! 虽说也能从某种程度上削弱, 但程度远不及C选项.

这是我做的总结. 请指正.


作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-10-21 09:07
ding
作者: Howto    时间: 2009-3-25 10:56


作者: 氤氲雾气    时间: 2010-9-16 14:39
我也选了e,貌似觉得更容易理解啊。c有点怪怪的
作者: melodyldeeaves    时间: 2011-5-19 13:08
标题: 楼主请看
文章中是说的 idling around "the curb" 但是E选项说的可是 P城啊  而且是在P城周围 不一定就靠近建筑物啊




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3