72. Large national budget deficits do not cause large trade deficits. If they did, countries with the largest budget deficits would also have the largest trade deficits. In fact, when deficit figures are adjusted so that different countries are reliably comparable to each other, there is no such correlation.
If the statements above are all true, which of the following can properly be inferred on the
basis of them?
(A) Countries with large national budget deficits tend to restrict foreign trade.
(B) Reliable comparisons of the deficit figures of one country with those of another are
impossible.
(C) Reducing a country’s national budget deficit will not necessarily result in a lowering of
any trade deficit that country may have.
(D) When countries are ordered from largest to smallest in terms of population, the smallest
countries generally have the smallest budget and trade deficits.
(E) Countries with the largest trade deficits never have similarly large national budget
deficits.
巨大的国家预算赤字不会造成导致巨大的贸易赤字。如果是的话，那么，预算赤字巨大的国家其贸易赤字也巨大。事实上，如果把每个国家的赤字调整到互相具有可比性，那么国家预算赤字与贸易赤字就不存在这样的关系了。
请问大牛能帮忙解释一下"这样的关系"这的是什么关系? 难到每个国家的赤字调整到互相具有可比性的时候,就没有这样的"巨大的国家预算赤字不会造成导致巨大的贸易赤字"关系了? 那是啥关系呢?
先谢了!
不是NN，试着回答一下
such correlation应该是指countries with the largest budget deficits would also have the largest trade deficits，所以原文最后一句话的意思是“事实上，当把不同国家的赤字调整到具有可比性后，预算赤字和贸易赤字并不存在这样的关系（预算赤字最大的国家贸易赤字也将最大）”。因此，作者得出结论说：巨大的预算赤字不会导致巨大的贸易赤字。
所以归纳原文可以得出：预算赤字大的国家贸易赤字不一定大，那么如果降低预算赤字的话，贸易赤字也不一定会下降，即C
是C，B是错误的。
因为reliable comparisons是可能的，并非不可能
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |