分词放句首,要注意时序性问题.
261. Being a
(A) Being a
(B) Having been a
(C) Born in
(D) Being born in
(E) Having been born in
A B DE都有时序性错误。
C is best. The first clause presents its information clearly and in logical sequence. The use of a semicolon to set apart the remaining information further assists the clarity of the sentence. In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism and oddly presents its information in reverse chronological order. Choice B illogically suggests that upon her birth in 1940, Mukherjee had already been a
In D and E, the use of progressive forms (Being born, having been, Having been born, and being) implies continuous action, a notion that is not appropriate to the facts being presented. Also, these forms do not establish a logical time sequence, suggesting, for example, that Mukherjee had been a
又如:
1-12. Traveling the back roads of
(A) Traveling the back roads of
(B) In 1905, Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály, traveling the back roads of
(C) In 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of
(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed(C)
(E) Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of
Choices A and B are wordy and imprecise:
时序性错误:the phrasing suggests that Bartók and Kodály were already traveling the back roads of
可是这一题:
13.
(A) Japan received huge sums of capital from the United States after the Second World War, using it to help build
(B)
(C) Japan used the huge sums of capital it received from the United States after the Second World War to help build
(D) Japan’s huge sums of capital received from the United States after the Second World War were used to help it in building(C)
(E) Receiving huge sums of capital from the United States after the Second World War, Japan used it to help build
对与E.我想问,除了it指sums of..的错误, 我觉得这里时序性没有问题.用Receving表示先收到钱,然后在用....
可是OG却说:
In E, it is again without a singular noun referent, and Receiving huge sums…
那么这题的解释和1-12的解释不是矛盾了吗????
十分困惑啊!!~~~~~~
抱歉很晚才回复,因为早晨看到你的帖子后也觉得有点迷惑,所以一直在想这个问题。
在1-12题中,并不是表示动作有先后,而是表示同时,分词分句作伴随,表示同时发生的事情。而在12题中这两个动作在逻辑上是不能同时发生的。OG解释是were already traveling the back roads of
而在13题中,动作是有先后的,E仍然使用了伴随状语的形式,表示同时发生,因此OG才会解释does not make clear the sequence of events。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |