ChaseDream

标题: 刘振民精解VS OG！ [打印本页]

作者: 紫衣女孩 时间: 2006-4-4 23:03
标题: 刘振民精解VS OG！

新OG 第9题，同大全677

刘振民精解选C，OG选A

请牛人解惑

谢谢

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2006-4-13 00:34
以OG为准！

作者: hannah1112 时间: 2006-4-13 18:14

能把题目传上来看看吗？

作者: 紫衣女孩 时间: 2006-4-13 21:45

好的没问题我看了刘的解释觉得挺有道理能帮我分析下OG的吗实在不觉得对呵呵

9. Sunspots, vortices of gas associated with strong electromagnetic activity, are visible as dark spots on surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on the Sun's poles or equator.

(A) are visible as dark spots on the surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on

(B) are visible as dark spots that never have been sighted on the surface of the Sun

(D) appear as dark spots on the surface of the Sun, although never having been sighted at

(E) appear as dark spots on the Sun's surface, which have never been sighted on

同大全677

The correct parallel structure in the original sentence emphasizes the contrast between where sunspots are found (are visible...Sun) and where they are not (have ever beensighted...equator). Sunsports is the subject of the sentence, are is the verb of the first part of the contrast and have been sighted is the verb of the the second. The adjective visible is a complement and is a parallel to the past participle sighted. Both parts of the sentence conclude with phrases indicating location.The contrast itself is indicated by the conjunction but.

A.correct. This sentence clearly and correctly draws a contrast between where sunspots are found and where they are not

B.Changing the modifying clause so that that never...Sun distorts the meaning of the sentence; the contrast is lost

C.Although typically introduces a subordinate clause, which has a subject and a verb, but here there is no subject and sighted is not a complete verb

D.Although usually introduce a subordinate clause, but there is no subject of the clause and having been sighted is not a complete verb phrase

E.The relative pronoun which should immediately follow its referent; here which illogically follows surface, and its intended referent, either sunspots or dark spots, becomes unclear

作者: carolhide 时间: 2006-4-13 22:15

具体问题呢？

建议下研究OG吧，造成这样先入为主的印象就不太好。

作者: 紫衣女孩 时间: 2006-4-13 23:25
说ON指面，AT只点 POLE是个点应该用AT

作者: carolhide 时间: 2006-4-14 10:24

有时候这样的说法并不绝对的，有些是固定搭配就不遵循这个规则。介词搭配问题是挺头痛的，我做题时一般尽量找其他考点选答案。

所以不要一味信仰法则，XDF的某些黄金法则还是争议颇多的。

作者: 紫衣女孩 时间: 2006-4-14 22:37

那能给我讲讲A为什么对吗这个题我不太懂，不知考的那个点

谢谢

作者: carolhide 时间: 2006-4-15 08:26

以下是引用紫衣女孩在2006-4-14 22:37:00的发言：

那能给我讲讲A为什么对吗这个题我不太懂，不知考的那个点

谢谢

MM要习惯看OG的解释，这题OG已经把考点都罗列了。建议MM去下OG菜鸟手册，所有考点NN都总结出来了，是非常不错的东西。

作者: 紫衣女孩 时间: 2006-4-15 10:43

好的好的

谢谢斑竹提示

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)