ChaseDream

标题: [求助]再问 og237----where 谢谢!:) [打印本页]

作者: juliet01192000    时间: 2006-3-25 11:29
标题: [求助]再问 og237----where 谢谢!:)

关于237where的用法还没讨论过。xdjm们帮帮忙!谢谢:)


237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.


(A) may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other


(B) may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other


(C) are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other


(D) are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the otherE


(E) are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other


ans: E


og解释: In A, the phrase the interaction where two stars orbit each other is imprecise and illogical, suggesting that the interaction is a place where the orbiting occurs.


这里where做地点定语从句。


如果补全从句应该是: the interaction where(= in which) two stars orbit each other


即:two stars orbit each other in the interaction.


这句话怎么错了?我没看出有逻辑错误呀!?


In D, the word where has no clear or logical referent, and each is orbiting the other is awkward and unnecessarily wordy; it could be replaced by the clearer and more concise orbiting each other.


先不看从句是否简洁。og说应为where没有指代对象所以不对(前提是og把它看成了定从)。


但是这句话也可以看成地点状语呀?!地点状语中的where不用有指代对象,只是引出地点,这样看D不就没有错了吗(忽略简洁问题)。


盼解答,谢谢!:)



作者: juliet01192000    时间: 2006-3-27 01:02
up!
作者: predator_yl    时间: 2006-3-27 13:32

对于第一个问题:OG中where是不等于in which的,有题目明确指出where应该改成in which,juliet01192000可以去查查


作者: juliet01192000    时间: 2006-3-27 19:59
以下是引用predator_yl在2006-3-27 13:32:00的发言:

对于第一个问题:OG中where是不等于in which的,有题目明确指出where应该改成in which,juliet01192000可以去查查


不明白predator_yl gg的话。。。


作者: juliet01192000    时间: 2006-4-3 00:05
up!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3