ChaseDream

标题: 请教两个难点 [打印本页]

作者: xshaolong 时间: 2006-3-15 08:47
标题: 请教两个难点
请问在做销弱题时，如何区分它因销弱与无关选项，有时实在容易混淆。

另外在做infer题时，到底应该找出推论还是按照assumption题的做法去寻找gap，费费１３５中包括两种例子，但还是不清楚到底采用那种方法。请指教。

作者: orange2005 时间: 2006-3-15 10:43

以下是引用xshaolong在2006-3-15 8:47:00的发言：
请问在做销弱题时，如何区分它因销弱与无关选项，有时实在容易混淆。

另外在做infer题时，到底应该找出推论还是按照assumption题的做法去寻找gap，费费１３５中包括两种例子，但还是不清楚到底采用那种方法。请指教。

呵呵。。。你这2句话本身就是2个难点。。。
有没有例题啊，贴一个上来才好分析呀。。。现在这里把方法说得再多，也只是纸上谈兵。

作者: xshaolong 时间: 2006-3-16 13:00

举个例子，费费１３５中的１０４题，为何选E，如何确定是他因而不是无关项?多谢!

104. That the policy of nuclear
deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second
World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has
kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide
nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it
uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not
happened.

Which one of the following, if
true, indicates a flaw in the argument?

(A) Maintaining a high level of
nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.

(B) From what has happened in the
past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future,
so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.

(C) Continuing to produce nuclear
weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increase the likelihood of a
nuclear accident.

(D) The major powers have engaged
in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World
War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.

(E) It cannot be known whether it
was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition
of the economic value of remaining at peace.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)