ChaseDream

标题: 2006 MBA Ranking from FT [打印本页]

作者: mydream1977 时间: 2006-2-5 16:40
标题: 2006 MBA Ranking from FT
各位, 新的2006 MBA 排名, 可以看看参考一下.
[attach]45020[/attach]

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-2-5 16:41:08编辑过]

作者: cicilla 时间: 2006-2-5 17:23
thanks for sharing!

作者: knobhill18 时间: 2006-2-5 17:46
thanks for sharing

作者: jalenw 时间: 2006-2-5 17:59
CEIBS的SALARY 居然有135000$,不太相信。

作者: blahblah 时间: 2006-2-5 18:40
好像没有Indiana 的 Kelley，好多年都没有，奇怪

作者: icon 时间: 2006-2-5 20:34
thank you

作者: icon 时间: 2006-2-5 20:37
Kellogg 这么低？

作者: iampig123 时间: 2006-2-7 15:32

是阿,有点瞎排的意思,看来金融时报比华尔街日报的排名也好不到哪儿去. 竟把 Kellogg和Duke排到很多欧洲二流学校的后面, 太 bias 了.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-2-7 15:36:34编辑过]

作者: tty 时间: 2006-2-7 15:45
明显抬举欧洲的学校了

作者: julia_ju 时间: 2006-2-7 16:43

中欧21，康奈尔36。

真牛。

作者: grizzly 时间: 2006-2-7 22:51

CEIBS starting salary is higher than that of Kellogg and Berkeley?

What the dell is going on?

作者: jalenw 时间: 2006-2-7 22:58

以下是引用grizzly在2006-2-7 22:51:00的发言：

CEIBS starting salary is higher than that of Kellogg and Berkeley?

What the dell is going on?

这位兄弟想打hell吧，呵呵。DELL蒙受不白之冤

作者: grizzly 时间: 2006-2-7 23:07

是啊，笔误。

如果中欧真的这么牛X，估计就没多少人申请US的MBA了。

作者: jennynrick 时间: 2006-2-7 23:37

The salary data and weighted salary figures are standardised by conversion to US dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) rates estimated by the World Bank. PPP rates reflect the cost of standard goods in each country.
By applying PPP rates to the alumni salaries, it is possible to measure and compare respondents’ purchasing power and the standard of living enjoyed within their own countries (all standardised to US dollars). Extraordinarily high salaries are omitted before calculating the averages, as well as salary data from alumni working in the non-profit and public sectors and from students.

not really the salary you earn

作者: 福宝宝 时间: 2006-2-8 09:01
感觉FT的排名的确finance的痕迹很重，许多金融见长的学校都排在前面，而其他general management或者entrepreneur突出的学校就只好垫底了。。。

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-2-8 13:54

有点和心目中得排名不大一致，虽然以前知道中欧排名比较靠前

作者: kangning 时间: 2006-2-8 14:00
感觉每年的变化也太大，有些学校两年内能上窜下跳好几十名，太玄乎了点吧

作者: richardg047 时间: 2006-2-8 14:15

以下是引用jalenw在2006-2-5 17:59:00的发言：
CEIBS的SALARY 居然有135000$,不太相信。

同感，打死我也不信！

作者: shenxiaoyang 时间: 2006-2-8 22:43
呵呵，看来各家的排名差别很大的说，感觉趋势是欧洲和亚洲学校排名逐渐靠前了。

作者: yorkzhong 时间: 2006-2-8 22:58

it's very interesting to see CEIBS ranks higher than Duke,CMU, Darden, UNC. So, either most people in CD is just stupid - to spend much higher tuition to read a US school, or the ranking is just piece of shxx.

作者: adrw1974 时间: 2006-2-9 00:24

The 2006 Financial Times rankings are based on surveys completed by alumni who graduated in 2002 and on information provided by the schools.由學校校友及學校本身提供的資料進行調查，我覺得說服力有待商確

Each school is judged on the alumni's career development and salary purchasing power, the diversity of the school and its MBA program, and its research capabilities. 研究型的program比較佔優勢。

Purdue排那麼後面我覺得太不合理了。還有很多很好的學校都沒排進去。

個人覺得FT的ranking 看看就好，不必太在意。

作者: jcz2008 时间: 2006-7-20 14:34
thanks for sharing!!

作者: goodssb 时间: 2006-7-20 14:48
看了那么多排名,我还是比较相信ft的排名

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)