Reviewing historical data, medical researchers in
The researchers’ conclusion would be most strengthened if which of the following were true?
(A) Programs designed to control the size of disease-bearing mosquito populations have not affected the incidence of mosquito borne encephalitis.
(B) The occupations of county residents affect their risk of exposure to mosquito-borne encephalitis more than does television-watching.
(C) The incidence of mosquito-borne encephalitis in counties with the largest number of television sets per capita is likely to decrease even further.
(D) The more time people in a county spend outdoors, the greater their awareness of the dangers of mosquito-borne encephalitis.(E)
(E) The more television sets there are per capita in a county, the more time the average county resident spends watching television.
觉得E完全是无关,想不通阿,我觉得C更对
肯定是E,将有电视和在家时间长联系了起来.(前提是要知道有电视未必就会在家看电视,本来是不相关的通过E选项使两者相关了,因而加强)
GWD方法
这样解释有点道理
但现在看来E更像是Assumption,不像加强,加强应该是提供更多(further)证据,而不是跑回原点在assumption上做文章阿
昏~~~~
恩,E应该是正确的,在TV sets数量和在家时间搭桥(TV多的看的多,因而在家)。
我想问一下A选项,算不算也加强呢(当然力度没有E大),说一个控制项目无效,算不算排除他因?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |