ChaseDream

标题: 885-d-19 [打印本页]

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-24 12:54
标题: 885-d-19

. Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he

(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had

(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he（B）

(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

我选的是A，答案是B。我解释我错误的原因是:

应该是时态的问题，并不是因为886年king Alfred征服并保卫了伦敦而获得了市民的忠诚。应该用过去完成时。所以答案是B。

还请高人评判一下，是不是这个原因。

作者: carolhide 时间: 2006-1-24 13:04
不是，你选A的话did not mean的主语是什么？

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-24 14:04

Just because这个短句。

在longman里有这一句话:

Just because you're my brother doesn't mean I have to like you!

和这句基本一样

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-24 14:06

又比如这句：

Just because you shop at the local indoor mall does not make you an expert on the retail sector of the economy.

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-25 09:23
没人有兴趣做进一步的了解吗？

作者: wycg 时间: 2006-1-25 14:47
时态可以排除A,just because也可以排除A,2楼说的也可以排除A.

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-25 18:39
我认为just because排除不了，没有高手有兴趣做更进一步的研究吗？理由见3楼与4楼的例句，两个例句全是从longman摘录的

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-25 18:40:54编辑过]

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-26 10:54
再顶一次，我想把这个问题搞清楚

作者: wycg 时间: 2006-1-26 11:06
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified LACE w:st="on">LondonLACE> in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified LACE w:st="on">LondonLACE> in 886 did not mean that he

(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified LACE w:st="on">LondonLACE> in 886 did not mean that he had

(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified LACE w:st="on">LondonLACE> in 886, it did not mean that he（B）

(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

A句中,就算just because是对的, 先不看, 那后面的: "King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 "是干嘛的呢?它后面有接了"did not mean that ". 这个用法是不对的.

作者: carolhide 时间: 2006-1-26 12:36

抱歉，我也去查了一下，你说的对，是有这个句式，我糊涂了。

不过发现它的用法是just because...doesn't mean，是否已经规定它只能用一般现在时而非过去时呢？

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-26 16:36

是啊，这个有点奇怪。。我手头的语法书只有longman

9楼的朋友的意思我不是太懂，呵呵，不好意思，能否解释的更详细一些，为什么呢？

作者: carlito 时间: 2006-1-27 13:04

是时态问题，用过去完成时时最准确的

作者: 顾风 时间: 2006-1-28 16:02

I think so, thanks a lot.

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-8-19 22:31
up

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)