ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]OG11th-101 [打印本页]

作者: seasnow    时间: 2006-1-23 06:26
标题: [讨论]OG11th-101

101.      El Nino, the periodic abnormal warming of the sea surface off Peru, a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine allowing the warm water that has accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.


(A) a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine allowing the warm water that has accumulated


(B) a phenomenon where changes in the ocean and atmosphere are combining to allow the warm water that is accumulating


(C) a phenomenon in which ocean and atmosphere changes combine and which allows the warm water that is accumulated


(D) is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that has accumulated


(E)   is a phenomenon where ocean and atmosphere changes are combining and allow the warm water accumulating



选D吗?不能用where吧?


作者: Evelyn2005    时间: 2006-1-23 08:48

有N人总结过,OG认为changes in the ocean and atmosphere 的用法比ocean and atmosphere changes好,但是不太知道能不能用where.



作者: wycg    时间: 2006-1-23 09:14
D.用in which. 白勇的书里有讲.
作者: v521    时间: 2006-1-23 12:46

where refers to a place, but EN is a phenomenon.


so where is wrong.


作者: zhanghz    时间: 2006-2-11 10:20

A B C的话,整个句子没有谓语部分。


(E)   is a phenomenon where ocean and atmosphere changes are combining and allow the warm water accumulating


where应该指地点,这里应该不能用吧。并且are combining 和allow不平行,语法上和意思上都说不过去吧。。


作者: andyteng    时间: 2006-3-23 17:47

GMAT 语法中, in which 优先于 where.


作者: sunyi001    时间: 2006-3-23 22:37
以下是引用andyteng在2006-3-23 17:47:00的发言:

GMAT 语法中, in which 优先于 where.


correct


作者: FlowerJay    时间: 2006-9-10 03:15
allow是combine的结果,所以要有to
where一般是地点,书面上用in which好,因为表达了是in a phenomenon, not at a phenomenon, not to a phenomenon...

作者: yhysss    时间: 2007-6-24 01:01
D为什么要用完成时态?
作者: 没办法1987    时间: 2009-8-11 22:31

og11给的答案说明中有这样一句话:If the participial phrase were to modify the previous clause, a comma would have to be inserted between combine and allowing.

是不是就是说,如果分词短语想要修饰前面的句子,中间必须要有逗号??

但是这个不应该啊,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=3304064&id=326156&page=1&skin=0&Star=5

这个贴是现在分词的总结,

og98:

As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest about the middle of the twelfth century, most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

(A)  whose access to water was less limited

(B)  where there was access to water that was less limited     

(C)  where they had less limited water access

(D)  with less limitations on water access

(E)  having less limitations to water access

解释E:

E     As a countable quantity, limitations should be modified by fewer, not less; having is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the Anasazi or other clans

这里having前面没有“,”但是他却说有歧义?!!

As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest about the middle of the twelfth century, most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

(A)  whose access to water was less limited

(B)  where there was access to water that was less limited     

(C)  where they had less limited water access

(D)  with less limitations on water access

(E)  having less limitations to water access

解释E:

E     As a countable quantity, limitations should be modified by fewer, not less; having is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the Anasazi or other clans

这里having前面没有“,”但是他却说有歧义?!!


作者: yinan    时间: 2009-9-10 15:50
顶楼上的,这个allowing的修饰为什么一定要加“,”
作者: struta    时间: 2009-11-12 02:25

og11给的答案说明中有这样一句话:If the participial phrase were to modify the previous clause, a comma would have to be inserted between combine and allowing.

是不是就是说,如果分词短语想要修饰前面的句子,中间必须要有逗号??

但是这个不应该啊,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=3304064&id=326156&page=1&skin=0&Star=5

这个贴是现在分词的总结,

As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest about the middle of the twelfth century, most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

(A)  whose access to water was less limited

(B)  where there was access to water that was less limited      

(C)  where they had less limited water access

(D)  with less limitations on water access

(E)  having less limitations to water access

解释E:

E     As a countable quantity, limitations should be modified by fewer, not less; having is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the Anasazi or other clans

这里having前面没有“,”但是他却说有歧义?!!
-- by 会员 没办法1987 (2009/8/11 22:31:00)



你想问的是什么? 有点糊涂了
作者: zoeykao    时间: 2009-12-1 15:29
E     As a countable quantity, limitations should be modified by fewer, not less; having is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the Anasazi or other clans

这里having前面没有“,”但是他却说有歧义?!!





having是定语修饰前面名词,但是这题allowing的解释说修饰前面的句子表伴随前面要有逗号
作者: lmiltamy    时间: 2010-6-8 21:06
續問,如果這裡 combing allowing  沒有逗號,變成allowing modify combing 那句意會變成什麼樣子?
作者: goaheadgmat    时间: 2010-6-8 21:30
up
a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that has accumulated 谁能翻译下,咋就看不明白意思呢,特别是 combine  起啥作用,啥成分
作者: nancyhearste    时间: 2010-8-10 08:05
og11给的答案说明中有这样一句话:If the participial phrase were to modify the previous clause, a comma would have to be inserted between combine and allowing.
是不是就是说,如果分词短语想要修饰前面的句子,中间必须要有逗号??
但是这个不应该啊,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=3304064&id=326156&page=1&skin=0&Star=5
这个贴是现在分词的总结,
og98:As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest about the middle of the twelfth century, most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

(A)  whose access to water was less limited

(B)  where there was access to water that was less limited      

(C)  where they had less limited water access

(D)  with less limitations on water access

(E)  having less limitations to water access

解释E:
E     As a countable quantity, limitations should be modified by fewer, not less; having is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the Anasazi or other clans
这里having前面没有“,”但是他却说有歧义?!!


-- by 会员 没办法1987 (2009/8/11 22:31:00)



OG12中已经将having is ambiguous这个解释去掉了,估计GMAC也发现这个问题了
作者: djlinda001    时间: 2012-8-31 19:11
OG解释中明确说了  Where cannot correctly refer to phenomenon




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3