hohoo说的还是挺清楚的,那个叫什么的光屁股的斑竹,og里面并没说改变了重心了,你这个理论是哪里来的?
49. Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply
(C) programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply
(D) programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying
(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying
选B？enable和be able to重复吧？还有平行结构，对吧？
B
1.平行 2.重复 3.限制性定语从句 4.主谓一致
答案没有问题，只是一般来说，分词ｉｎｇ，也可以表示伴随意思,那么这里，选项Ｄ中的 applying可不可以理解成是与move是伴随的? to do A and to do B,表示A,B是同时进行的, 那么to do A, doing B,不也是表示A, B 是同时进行的吗?
答案没有问题，只是一般来说，分词ｉｎｇ，也可以表示伴随意思,那么这里，选项Ｄ中的 applying可不可以理解成是与move是伴随的? to do A and to do B,表示A,B是同时进行的, 那么to do A, doing B,不也是表示A, B 是同时进行的吗?
改变句子重心了。
改变句子重心了。
谢谢carolhide的解释，老是麻烦你，呵呵！不过可不可以具体解释一下：
什么叫改变了重心？是说to do A and to do B 是同样重要，而to do A, doing B，Ｂ变成了Ａ的依附了， 是这个意思吗？
谢谢carolhide的解释，老是麻烦你，呵呵！不过可不可以具体解释一下：
什么叫改变了重心？是说to do A and to do B 是同样重要，而to do A, doing B，Ｂ变成了Ａ的依附了， 是这个意思吗？
基本对，to do A and to do B， 两个成分是并列的，而to do A, doing B就变成一个是主句部分，而另一个是修饰成分。每个部分在句子中的地位最好不要改变。
题目做对了，谁能翻译下这个句子？？？
请问，不考虑限制性定从这个原因，C用了分号后，前后2句各自应为独立句子，
后半句的that应看成是引导词，后半句缺主谓，错。
还是应将that看成是主语，由于分号的使用，导致前后2句信息断裂，that不能指代programs，缺失指代对象，错。
抑或是句子是对的，that可以指代programs。
49. Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that
enable a family with insufficient savings for a
conventional down payment to be able to move into new
housing and to apply
part of the rent to a purchase later.
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply
(C) programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply
(D) programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down
payment to move into new housing, applying
(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying
Rhetorical construction
In a lengthy sentence consisting of many phrases, it is essential to determine which phrases and words are necessary to the sentence and which words may be eliminated because they are unnecessary The relative pronoun that correctly refers to programs and introduces the subordinate clause; family is followed by two phrases that are clear and correct. To be able to move, however, is needlessly wordy, repeating the meaning of enable, and can be reduced to to move. This creates a parallel construction in which programs ... enable a family ... to move ... and to apply.
A To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move
B Correct. In this sentence, eliminating the wordy construction to be able allows to move to be parallel to to apply.
C Using a semicolon here causes that to refer too broadly to the entire previous clause rather than specifically to programs; the two infinitives should be joined by the conjunction and, not separated by a comma.
D The restrictive clause following programs defines programs and must be followed by that, which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information; enables does not agree with the plural subject
E That introduces a restrictive clause that defines programs; which introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off by a pair of commas, that may be dropped from the sentence; that is required here because the clause defines programs
这句的意思是说,that可以用来指代整个句子了?
我怎么一直记得,that是用来指代同种但不同一个的名词,而且记得that做主语基本就是错,还记得that指代时需要加限制成分
好象从来没有见过that指代整句话的题.
这个就是对句子的逻辑意思的把握啊
把应该平行的变成一主一次了
还有D选项的解释中
which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information
怎么理解呢 谢谢!
提个新问题:
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
OG解释说:A To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move
那怎么样to apply 就和 to move 平行了呢?
请NN解答!
从白勇哪里来的！
提个新问题:
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
OG解释说:A To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move
那怎么样to apply 就和 to move 平行了呢?
请NN解答!
如果是A，那么to apply就和to be able平行，在逻辑上是说不通的。所以要去掉to be able 。但我有一个新问题，既然是平行，为什么to apply的to不省略啊？
OG是说: which引导的,用双逗号隔开的非限制性定语从句用在这里是不对的,因为非限制性定语从句包含的是非关键性的附加信息.
非限制性定语从句删除的话无关痛痒;而由that引导的限制性定语从句包含的是关键信息,属于句子表意重点要提及的内容,删除会影响到表意的完整性. 这也是一些人所说的改变句子重心.
由此我也想到这个问题: SC中,原文是that/which, 选项改成which/that是否就必错呢?请NN指点.
还有D选项的解释中
which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information
怎么理解呢 谢谢!
OG是说: which引导的,用双逗号隔开的非限制性定语从句用在这里是不对的,因为非限制性定语从句包含的是非关键性的附加信息.
非限制性定语从句删除的话无关痛痒;而由that引导的限制性定语从句包含的是关键信息,属于句子表意重点要提及的内容,删除会影响到表意的完整性. 这也是一些人所说的改变句子重心.
由此我也想到这个问题: SC中,原文是that/which, 选项改成which/that是否就必错呢?请NN指点.
个人认为此题用doing表伴随是可以的，谁规定的只能并列啊？非限定定语从句用在此处不好，但也不是绝对不可以。
所以ETS故意在D中加入enables这个明显错误，E中加入enable sth. to be able to这个错。
刚又看了遍题，applying在这里不能做伴随状语的
伴随状语表伴随（废话）
但在未划线部分有later，说明两个动作的发生时间有先后，用applying不合理
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |