lural subject inventories does not agree with the singular verb leads; when is used to refer to a condition8. Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth,
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
8. Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied corresponding by increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
The modifying phrase when…sales is needlessly difficult to understand. The adverb correspondingly is incorrectly and ambiguously used; using the adjective corresponding to modify increases in sales makes the intended meaning more clear. Unaccompanied is not wrong but not accompanied puts greater emphasis on the negative. When indicates a period of time; if indicates a condition. If is preferable here.
A Correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous; when is used to refer to a condition
B lural subject inventories does not agree with the singular verb leads; when is used to refer to a condition
C ast tense were indicates a complete event, but can lead indicates a possibility that continues; when is used to refer to a condition
D Correspondingly increased sales is awkward and unclear; verb (leads) does not agree with the subject (inventories)
E Correct. If properly introduces a condition in this sentence; not accompanied emphasizes the negative; corresponding modifies increases in sales; the modifier is clear and comprehensible.
The correct answer is E.
MM的OG没有解释的？
sorry, 我只有题目，是好心的running给我的。
谢谢carolhide mm这么耐心!
这道题E会不会不平行呢？前面是存货，后面的中心词难道不应该是sales与之对应吗？现在中心词变成了increase，感觉不太舒服。
能不能讲讲Correspondingly increased sales和Corresponding increase in sales 有什么本质的区别。记得OG10里面好像有类似的题目，但是一时找不到。
(E) Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
意思是伴随着销售增长的库存，如果把重心放在sales的话就变成伴随着增长销售的库存，这样好象就读不通了。
Correspondingly increased sales和Corresponding increase in sales 有什么本质的区别
Correspondingly increased sales中心词是sales
Corresponding increase in sales 中心词是increase
(E) Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
意思是伴随着销售增长的库存，如果把重心放在sales的话就变成伴随着增长销售的库存，这样好象就读不通了。
不明白。 CAROLHIDE 再讲讲吧
把修饰部分都去掉说吧
if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales
这样就变成伴随销售的库存，而愿意是要表达伴随增长的库存。
8. Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth,
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
A 中的correspondingly从意思上看应该用corresponding.错.E是5个选项中最好的.
many thanks
为什么说correspondingly的用法不对呢，看不懂？
carolhide版
说的非常非常的清楚，
D:if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
correspondingly increased sales一体的，adv+adj+n＝相应已经增长了的销售；另外leads错，lead
E：if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
corresponding increases in sales一体的，adj+n+介宾（句中类似状语成分）＝相应的销售上的增长
D的最简化版就是“库存，accompanied by sales”＝伴随着销售的库存（什么样的库存？：伴随着销售的库存，说不通）
E的最简化版就是“库存，accompanied by increases XX”＝伴随着XX增长的库存（XX＝ 销售）（什么样的库存？：伴随着销售增长的库存，bingo）
谢谢楼上的解释
我的问题是这样的：
选项A when unaccompanied correspondingly by oncrease in sales, can lead
og上的答案说" correspondingly" is awkward and ambiguous
Why?????
谢谢楼上的解释
我的问题是这样的：
选项A when unaccompanied correspondingly （adv.）by oncrease (n.)in sales, can lead
og上的答案说" correspondingly" is awkward and ambiguous
Why?????
副词不可以修饰名词，形容词可以修饰名词。
不过还有一个问题:
choic C 的解释: past tense were indicates a completed event, but can lead indicates a possiblity that continuous ;这里d, e选项都是用过去分词，难道过去分词也可以表示动做的延续吗？
这里说correspondingly ambiguous 其实是因为它可能会修释到 unaccompanied
C 不行因为用了表时间的 when. d, e 都是 "if"
谢谢carolhide mm这么耐心!
这道题E会不会不平行呢？前面是存货，后面的中心词难道不应该是sales与之对应吗？现在中心词变成了increase，感觉不太舒服。
能不能讲讲Correspondingly increased sales和Corresponding increase in sales 有什么本质的区别。记得OG10里面好像有类似的题目，但是一时找不到。
seasnow的问题很好，但carolhide的解释似乎不能很好地回答这个问题。另外rising inventories是本句的主语，表示增加的库存，为什么要理解为伴随...增加的库存呢，主语还要伴随什么？
correspondingly increased sales中的correspondingly是副词修饰形容词increased（或者理解为作副词修饰动词原型increase),为什么awkward and unclear呢？难道还有别的什么理解不成？
请指正
Did MM refer to OG10-37:
37. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.
(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.
Some thoughts:
Rising inventories: an ongoing action
increased sales: a finished action, more focus on the "increased" state rather than the increase action.
Thus, corresponding increase is prefered to correspondingly increased to match with rising.
Did MM refer to OG10-37:
37. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.
(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.
Some thoughts:
Rising inventories: an ongoing action
increased sales: a finished action, more focus on the "increased" state rather than the increase action.
Thus, corresponding increase is prefered to correspondingly increased to match with rising.
前面的解释都很好，但我觉得你的解释是抓住GMAT的真谛了，即逻辑搭配，而逻辑搭配中最难的就是词与词的逻辑搭配，动作性名词corresponding increase 对应动作性名词Rising inventories。而且OG的解题点也提示了：Diction+Logical prediction当然还有其它小的地方也可以起排除作用，比如我觉得can和possibly还是有区别的，应该尽量尊重原文。
第8题中正确选项E中是不是部分省略了谓语(be动词);另外主语怎么是inventories,而不是Rising inventories?
赞一下16楼的oncrossMM, 看完你的解释有种豁然开朗的感觉!
谢谢~~
同赞16楼的 相当强
此题B与D的选项, possibly “leads”, OG的解释是说: verb (leads) does not agree with the subject (inventories). 本题的subject为何不是rising inventories? 为何leads要改为lead?
同问之 如何判定主语？
再将尘封的帖子顶上来
小弟在此想请教：
"WHEN is used to refer to a condition"。有关这句OG中的解释不是很明白。
如果将此题选项E的IF换成WHEN是否一样成立呢？
再顶
Did MM refer to OG10-37:
37. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.
(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.
Some thoughts:
Rising inventories: an ongoing action
increased sales: a finished action, more focus on the "increased" state rather than the increase action.
Thus, corresponding increase is prefered to correspondingly increased to match with rising.
那如果将OG11-8的D选项改成
if not accompanied by corespondingly increasing sales, can lead
是否可以成立呢？
那如果将OG11-8的D选项改成
if not accompanied by corespondingly increasing sales, can lead
是否可以成立呢？
个人觉得corresponding increases in sales优于correspondingly increased sales(抽象名词优于分词)
再将尘封的帖子顶上来
小弟在此想请教：
"WHEN is used to refer to a condition"。有关这句OG中的解释不是很明白。
如果将此题选项E的IF换成WHEN是否一样成立呢？
OG11中的原话是 When indicates a period of time; if indicates a condition.
看了一遍帖子,这两个问题还是不太明白:
1.when/if引导条件状语从句:按og的说法when只能引导时间状从,只有if引导条件状从?但好像实际中用when也很多啊!是否gmat就是这么要求的?
2.句子的主语中心词到底是rising inventories还是inventories啊?rising inventories指一种情况,那就是单数了.如果rising是修饰inventories那就是复数了...这要怎么区分呢?我怎么觉得逻辑上来说前一种比较好啊...
看了一遍帖子,这两个问题还是不太明白:
1.when/if引导条件状语从句:按og的说法when只能引导时间状从,只有if引导条件状从?但好像实际中用when也很多啊!是否gmat就是这么要求的?
2.句子的主语中心词到底是rising inventories还是inventories啊?rising inventories指一种情况,那就是单数了.如果rising是修饰inventories那就是复数了...这要怎么区分呢?我怎么觉得逻辑上来说前一种比较好啊...
顶
顶
有没有人知道，主语到底是谁呢？我也觉得rising inventories 应该是主语，这样表达单数意思，谓语可以用单数啊．不可能只是＂库存＂导致．．．应该是＂增加的库存＂导致．．．
再顶！！我也同样有次疑惑。但是我是这样理解的：
如果rising inventories是主语的话，即用做单数，应该强调rising 这一动词，故选E，和increase in sales 中的increase 对应，且后面动词用can lead 也是成立的；
如果inventories 是主语的话，即用作复数，应该强调“增加的库存”，故应和D中的increasd sales中的sales 对应，但后面的动词leads 错了，应该改为lead .
但是疑问在于不可能同时两种主语都对吧，是否可能如果rising inventories 做主语的话，应该是rising inventory 呢？
请NN指教
1 理解ambiguously倒是很容易。在张道真语法说，副词修饰动词，通常位于动词后面。这里，correspondingly在unaccompanied后面在语法上面并没有，incorrect在哪里？
2同楼上的问题一样。
我也不明白主语的问题。
对于主语是rising inventories还是inventories还是不怎么清楚，从句意上理解，感觉前者更合适，即“存货的增加，当不能伴随销售的相应增加时。。。”，可根据OG的解释，主语却是inventories。
继续顶
非谓语动词只有动名词和不定式能做主语。Rising在这里肯定不是动名词，所以只能是现在分词，修饰主语inventories，表示主语正在处于的一个状态。所以主语是invertories。
明白了“伴随sales还是伴随increase”的分析，但是还是没明白为什么说“Rising inventories与Corresponding increase是平行的”？形式上确实是平行的，但逻辑意思却看不出来啊
初来乍到，请各位NN多多关照
我是这样理解的。rise是不及物动词，不能直接加宾语。raise是及物动词，可直接加宾语。所以Rising inventories里的rising肯定不是动词，同意楼上的为定语，意思是正在增长种的inventories。
请问can和possibly能否互换？多谢。
8. Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth,
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
选D，平行结构？对吗？
choos e
comparing d with e, it will be easily find that in choice d , the verb "leads" does not accord with the subject " inventories"
Did MM refer to OG10-37:
37. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.
(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.
Some thoughts:
Rising inventories: an ongoing action
increased sales: a finished action, more focus on the "increased" state rather than the increase action.
Thus, corresponding increase is prefered to correspondingly increased to match with rising.
太强大了!赞!
非谓语动词只有动名词和不定式能做主语。Rising在这里肯定不是动名词，所以只能是现在分词，修饰主语inventories，表示主语正在处于的一个状态。所以主语是invertories。
明白了“伴随sales还是伴随increase”的分析，但是还是没明白为什么说“Rising inventories与Corresponding increase是平行的”？形式上确实是平行的，但逻辑意思却看不出来啊
初来乍到，请各位NN多多关照
为什么rising inventries就不能看成是动名词呢？ 因为rising inventries 是 ongoing action,所以rising不可能是用来修饰Inventries的阿，这样就不是action了
试着用另一种思路解释下主语问题。
本体的主干是rising inventories can lead to production cutbacks. 即rising inventories 可能导致产量下降。
对比下面两种主语：
如果rising inventories是主语，那么就是“增加库存”这个动作，可能导致产量下降。
如果inventories是主语，那么就是“增长的库存”，如果没有销售的相应的增长，可能导致产量下降。
所以应该是“库存”导致产量下降，而不是动作导致产量下降。
欢迎讨论。
请问can和possibly能否互换？多谢。
再将尘封的帖子顶上来
小弟在此想请教：
"WHEN is used to refer to a condition"。有关这句OG中的解释不是很明白。
如果将此题选项E的IF换成WHEN是否一样成立呢？
og12 已经把"WHEN is used to refer to a condition"去掉了，看来og错了。
When indicates a period of time; if indicates a condition. 应该是og 认可的原则
对于主语是rising inventories还是inventories还是不怎么清楚，从句意上理解，感觉前者更合适，即“存货的增加，当不能伴随销售的相应增加时。。。”，可根据OG的解释，主语却是inventories。
继续顶
在金山词霸发现这里两词都可当形容词
rising a. 上升的 所以为复数主语 inventories
corresponding a.相应的
动名词和现在分词作定语的区别。分词往往表示它所修饰的词所做的动作，即逻辑主语是它所修饰的词；动名词往往表示与它所修饰的词有关的动作，即所修饰的词不能充当逻辑主语。
这里rising inventories是有主谓关系的，即inventories that is rising。所以rising是现在分词作定语修饰主语inventories
smallear8 发表于 2012-6-9 08:49
就算是when表示a period time,不能表示条件，也能解释的过来呀，上升的存货，当没有伴随销售的增加的时候， ...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
