ChaseDream

标题: GWD5-39新问题 [打印本页]

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-7 15:54
标题: GWD5-39新问题

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.

a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing

a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing

a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written

which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing

which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

这题答案B结构没有问题,但是句义有疑惑.在2000年发生的事件,用现在进行时解释,会不会有歧义?望牛人指点.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-7 15:54:24编辑过]

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-7 17:51

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-7 18:11

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-7 20:14

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-8 01:21

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-10 16:44

作者: wycg 时间: 2006-1-10 17:27
B是最好的呀.五个选项里没有用过去时的呀.LZ看好哪个选项呢?

作者: donna 时间: 2006-1-10 23:45
后面的句子是修饰phenomenon ，一种现象，阐述的时候用一般现在时

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-11 00:23
可是B选项里面是进行时啊?

作者: shaoji 时间: 2006-1-11 17:35

作者: donna 时间: 2006-1-11 18:20

该句的，主句是In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, 这里用的是过去式，所以时态是对的

该句的结构层次比较多，在主句后接着一个从句，作为独立主格状语从句，由a phenomenon ＋修饰的从句

该从句中还有一个修饰从句，修饰the fact，事实后面可接进行时，作为修饰当时正发生的事件．

该句主要考的是not (only)...but also...,考对称；

作者: 赋格 时间: 2009-10-26 23:17
请问not only...but also中only可以省略么？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)