ChaseDream

标题: gwd 29-29 [打印本页]

作者: ershao 时间: 2005-12-25 21:48
标题: gwd 29-29

Q29:

Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year

year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year

year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education

year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously

year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

答案为D，不明白B为什么不好?

请NN帮忙解答，谢谢............

作者: carolhide 时间: 2005-12-25 21:53

B中的which修饰education，逻辑错误。

作者: 五大老 时间: 2006-3-9 21:12

我觉得B没错，which就是指代education,也就是education was previously paid for $7的意思

请指教

作者: LunarLin 时间: 2006-3-9 23:43

up.

toward这个用法不懂...

作者: 入画 时间: 2006-3-10 00:09
B不应该用被动吧。

作者: titatita 时间: 2006-6-9 10:40

以下是引用ershao在2005-12-25 21:48:00的发言：

Q29:

Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a
year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

答案为D，不明白B为什么不好?

请NN帮忙解答，谢谢............

在b中:for which这种定语从句,for which是作为从句中的状语,那么大家看,从句根本没有主语

如果将for认为是介词因为的意思,那么for which又是不符合习惯的表达

这题我选c,compared to ....作为插入语,

因为觉得instead of是gmat不喜欢的选项

作者: 二狼神 时间: 2006-6-15 20:18
我选E,语法和意思都正确.D的意思有偏差:,(?)instead of..注意红字.

作者: mba06 时间: 2006-6-26 14:53

支持titatita GG。我也選C。

for which was previously paid $7 per year這樣的結構可以把for放到後面。這樣就成了﹕

was previously paid $7 per year for higher education。which指代education。從句的主語沒了。

C和D很接近。C把compared to the previously $7 per year加在中間﹐是就近和$330 per year比較。用instead of 放在最後﹐有點遠了。

E讀着有些wordy﹐就沒仔細看它的語法結構。

作者: hwhhs 时间: 2006-7-7 10:37
..

作者: titatita 时间: 2006-8-10 19:39

今天再看这题,发现了c的一个绝对错误

compare to是把什么比喻成什么的意思

compare with才是拿....和....比较的意思.所以c错.

d中instead of并非gmat优选选项,而且都用逗号,instead of这种结构我搜了一下大全.没有.

倒是e看不出什么明显错误

现在倾向于选e

open to discuss

作者: 当当84 时间: 2006-8-27 20:36

instead of 是和 rather than 同时出现时不是优先选项，但是并没有说一定不能选，就像在有些时候there be 结构也是正确的一样

而且instead of 之所以不是优先选项是因为它是一个介词词组，而rather than是一个连词，这里e选项中的opposed to 也是一个介词词组，就不存在哪个有优势了，而且opposed to意思上也不好，记得og上好像有一题说不可以用opposed to 说只能用在两个完全相反的意思上。

所以支持d

作者: Winbolin 时间: 2006-10-20 20:42

以下是引用titatita在2006-8-10 19:39:00的发言：

今天再看这题,发现了c的一个绝对错误

compare to是把什么比喻成什么的意思

compare with才是拿....和....比较的意思.所以c错.

d中instead of并非gmat优选选项,而且都用逗号,instead of这种结构我搜了一下大全.没有.

倒是e看不出什么明显错误

现在倾向于选e

open to discuss

prefer C, compared to...就近修飾, 做插入語, toward...隨然與$300 a year 隔了遠一點, 但無明顯錯. 這裡, compared to的用法是Ok的.

多指教阿～～

作者: Winbolin 时间: 2006-10-20 20:46

另外D, E中多了個"the"$7, the是特指,這裡每年要繳的慣性$7, 應該是不需要用"the"吧？

指教～～

作者: gavinzhyh 时间: 2006-11-7 17:58

支持选D

E，contribute for不符合contribute的习惯用法；

contribute / Longman:

1. intransitive

1) contribute to something

City employees cannot contribute to political campaigns.

2) contribute X to/toward Y

The volunteers contribute their own time to the project.

2. transitive

contribute something

A，伴随结果表达过去事件错；

B，1) 没有动作的agent；2) X pay $7 for the education的被动形式应该是$7 was paid for the educaton，因此B为for which $7 was paid更好；

pay ./ Longman

pay for sth

pay somebody for something

pay money for something

C，the previously $7副词修饰名词错；

个人愚见选D，从错误级别看，E/C不符合习惯用法，B，被动语态的agent错误，应该首先排除；A，chronicle error比D的instead of比较对象不清晰更严重；并且D可以根据contribute money…instead of money的形式，以及逻辑判断是money的比较。

*welcome bricks*

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-7 22:50:48编辑过]

作者: hedge 时间: 2006-12-8 14:44
thanks

作者: hedge 时间: 2006-12-8 20:22
BC用 previously修饰名词,错

作者: sankoas 时间: 2006-12-31 17:47
compare to is definitely wrong, i prefer D

作者: lika_dk 时间: 2006-12-31 23:10
看来大家OG看的都不好.这道题主要考的是突出比较.拿现在的和以前的比.我记得OG里,具体哪道题忘了,有一道题和这道非常类似,解释里就有INSTEAD OF,ALTHOUGH等词用于比较意义的考点.AB中无比较词汇,肯定不对.C中短语用错.E中contribute后少一TO OR TOWARD 的成分.

作者: FlowerJay 时间: 2007-1-13 15:19

偶来分析一下 B的for which。

这种用法一般可以还原成：

which XXXX ....... for 这里面, which指代的成分是和for连用的。根据题意，应该是cost for education,也就是说ｗｈｉｃｈ指代education. 类似的用法常见的有 the place in which we are staying is Beijing。由此可见，比较正确地用法应该是 education for which the students need to bear a cost of 7$ (for).

总结一个规律，就像前面的朋友说的介词+which里面的which是不能充当句子主干的。但是有一个特例， there are many students, one of whom is my brother. 这里面的whom修饰students,是students得同位语，of whom 可以不用去看他。这样的句子其实就是 there are many students, and one of them is my brother.

请大家指教

作者: 期待蔚蓝 时间: 2007-1-20 12:57
介词+which 后面跟完整句子，B错！

作者: abort 时间: 2007-2-5 15:36
还是不明白，B中for which引导的从句不能倒装么？
$7 per year

was previously paid for education
牛牛解答呀

作者: chamcham 时间: 2007-6-19 17:20

1，用被动，使得动作的发出者不明。

2，句式上的不对称没有明显的表现出前后的对比。

3，which优先指代cost，但实际上which指代higher education会更简洁明确一些

4. if using conversed order, not necessary ($7 per year was paid for the cost); otherwise no subject in relative clause.

1. previously should be previous since modify noun phrase

2. compare to: A and B are not same thing; compare with: A and B are same thing, so should be compare with

So D

作者: guozao 时间: 2007-10-5 18:03
我觉得D体现了对称的原则:

requires them to contribute $330 a year( toward the cost of higher education, )instead of the $7 per year required previously

但是还是想不到B怎么不妥~~~

作者: woyuhong 时间: 2007-10-17 09:09
up

作者: 阿土莎莎 时间: 2007-12-6 13:01

作者: flying_cn 时间: 2007-12-6 13:35

Yes, it should be D...

thanks!

作者: snowofjune 时间: 2007-12-10 15:02
instead of 一看便排除，C为啥不对？记得白勇还是prep里面讲，compare to 和 compare with在GMAT 都可以做比较的

作者: 顿顿的微笑 时间: 2008-3-4 19:33
UP

作者: weideng 时间: 2008-3-13 12:54

以下是引用snowofjune在2007-12-10 15:02:00的发言：
instead of 一看便排除，C为啥不对？记得白勇还是prep里面讲，compare to 和 compare with在GMAT 都可以做比较的

compare to是比作

compare with是比较

作者: yzhao26 时间: 2008-5-23 10:45
ding

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-6-4 23:33
up

作者: freedomzhx 时间: 2008-9-7 22:53
能把我逼疯！！

作者: guogo 时间: 2009-4-1 05:06
C中compared to previously $7 per year, 7 per year是一个名词短语，previously是副词，副词不能修饰名词短语

作者: tracycy2007 时间: 2009-4-2 13:29

thank you

作者: JamesYi 时间: 2009-4-2 17:31

以下是引用gavinzhyh在2006-11-7 17:58:00的发言：

支持选D

C，the previously $7副词修饰名词错；

正解。

B中for wich was paid 7$ 定语从句还夹着倒装，怎么看怎么别扭

作者: jiaojiao1426 时间: 2009-4-17 15:02

以下是引用chamcham在2007-6-19 17:20:00的发言：

1，用被动，使得动作的发出者不明。

2，句式上的不对称没有明显的表现出前后的对比。

3，which优先指代cost，但实际上which指代higher education会更简洁明确一些

4. if using conversed order, not necessary ($7 per year was paid for the cost); otherwise no subject in relative clause.

1. previously should be previous since modify noun phrase

2. compare to: A and B are not same thing; compare with: A and B are same thing, so should be compare with

So D

which 优先指代cost是怎么回事情呢？

作者: xiaoniuren 时间: 2009-4-19 20:25

作者: yangxuandudu 时间: 2009-8-3 05:30
up

作者: jackieli007 时间: 2009-8-10 14:13
~~

作者: linjeedy 时间: 2009-8-23 22:37

以下是引用gavinzhyh在2006/11/7 17:58:00的发言：

支持选D

E，contribute for不符合contribute的习惯用法；

contribute / Longman:

1. intransitive

1) contribute to something

City employees cannot contribute to political campaigns.

2) contribute X to/toward Y

The volunteers contribute their own time to the project.

2. transitive

contribute something

A，伴随结果表达过去事件错；

B，1) 没有动作的agent；2) X pay $7 for the education的被动形式应该是$7 was paid for the educaton，因此B为for which $7 was paid更好；

pay ./ Longman

pay for sth

pay somebody for something

pay money for something

C，the previously $7副词修饰名词错；

*welcome bricks*

超赞！！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)