ChaseDream

标题: 补充题179 [打印本页]

作者: bigtone    时间: 2005-12-22 07:02
标题: 补充题179


179. With diamonds,
as with all gems, one should ask for a written description of one’s purchase;
the description may prove useful later if you have reason to believe the
jeweler misled you.



(A) one should ask for a written
description of one’s purchase



(B) you should ask for a written
description of your purchase



(C) a written discretion of your
purchase is what one should ask for



(D) a written description of one’s
purchase is what should be asked for(B)



(E) a written description of your
purchase is what should be asked for

答案是B,我选了E,主要是因为前面的with diamonds, 我觉得应该意思是“对于钻石来说”,感觉用物做主语更好吧。




作者: shellsnow    时间: 2005-12-22 14:10

顶一下,我对With的用法也是很头痛!我也问了一个关于with的逻辑主语的问题,可是还没有回答,这个题目中,e比较awkward.虽然这个awkard比较难界定,但是这个被动用得不好。


还请教这里with为什么可以modify you.


谢谢


作者: joe11    时间: 2005-12-22 21:58

解题的关键不在with, 未画线部分 the description may prove useful later if you have reason to believe the jeweler misled you.


>>


作者: shellsnow    时间: 2005-12-23 00:22
谢谢斑竹解释,境界果然不一样!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3