ChaseDream

标题: GWD 26-19 [打印本页]

作者: lymmba 时间: 2005-12-13 17:13
标题: GWD 26-19
Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide. Therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become to norm.

Which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?

A. Whether plant scientists have developed inset-resistant seeds for every crop that is currently grown commercially

B. Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage

C. Whether plants grown form the new genetically engineered seeds can be kept completely free of insect damage

D. Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do currently used seeds

E. Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar varieties in the past

我觉得D最重要，可答案是B

作者: 花篮的花儿香 时间: 2005-12-26 14:27
D

作者: 五大老 时间: 2006-3-7 23:09
这道题以前的gwd讨论有过相对的定论，应该是D

作者: guxin2000 时间: 2006-3-8 19:05

evaluating the argument above

这类类型的CR,我们应该如何去分析呢?

谢谢先

作者: superPPDD 时间: 2006-8-16 10:29

在D和 B中犹豫很久 B为什么不对呢

我觉得题目得重点在于

Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pes-

ticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide,

如果是,那么不用新得种子就可以use far less pesticide

如果不是,那么就要用新得种子了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)