gwd17-14,答案是否值得商榷？ - ChaseDream

通过比较ＡＢ　应该　Ｂ交好．Ａ的as companies that compete　　在句子中不做任何成分

Ｂ　中industries that are more established　虽然不够简洁　但不是致命的错误

vote for A, in industries that are more established （adj。）, 明显redundant，相对来说，as companies that compete，因为compete是实意动词，不构成redundant

answer is A, Because "one day" must form the relationship with "next". It make no sense if the two words appear in a simple sentence as adv. Furthermore, "one day" cannot modify company.

是不是THE MORE的用法错误，要么用THE MOST，要么用 IN MORE ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIES？

还有一个地方我想提出来：我读A的时候觉得internet industry 不在 more established industries 里面，而我读B的时候觉得internet industry 是more established industries里面的，但是情况和more established industries 中 clear competition 不同，是不是B的意思更准确一些，而A相当于把more established industries 和 internet industry 作了一个对比？

因为established industries明显比industries that are more established要好。

whereas和Although相比语气弱一些，如果作者不特别强调，也应该选择保持原句。

AS 做连词, 表原因LZM 语法. competing companies 表示现在进行的动作更符合原句的意思. 且主从句之间的对应比A 工整.

以下是引用hannah1112在2006-5-17 20:07:00的发言：

继续讨论。。。。。

1，A 的结构more整齐，对称。Although
                    the lines of competition are clearly defined
                    in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct
    in the Internet industry -- 典型的脸，鼻，口对称。just one example...hehe..

2, idiomatical 方面，A use"more established industries", B use "competing companies ",

3，i think it's most important aspect..我同意hannah1112的观点, B 的含义更清楚。

文章比较在一个范围
the more established industries, internet industry is one of the more established industries.. B 的形势更加清楚。。

以下是引用hawkinsxie在2006-6-23 7:45:00的发言：

A正确，已经盖棺定论！

as [companies that compete one day] may be [partners the next].

这里as是连词，表原因，这本身就是句子。

Although the lines of competition
            are clearly defined
            in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct
            in the Internet industry, as competing companies may be partners the next.

以下是引用llfllfllf在2006-6-24 23:01:00的发言：

来看一下Ｂ整体，

Although the lines of competition
   are clearly defined
   in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct
   in the Internet industry, as competing companies may be partners the next.

前面对的也是非常漂亮！！

还有什么理由不选Ｂ？？？？

不选B的理由就是那个one day. 楼上怎么把这么重要的部分给删了呢?

competing companies one day may be partners the next. 这里one day是时间状语修饰may be, 这句话Competing companies one day may be partners就可以了, 翻译Competing companies哪天就可能成partners了. 再加the next就不对了, 两个时间状语, 一个动词.

One day要做副词修饰competing的话, 在这里应提前, 从而避免歧意. as one day (once) competing companies may be partners the next.

以下是引用llfllfllf在2006-6-24 22:55:00的发言：

我觉得这个题目还是B对!结构非常的对称

as competing companies one day may be partners the next

其中:the next 指的是the next day

对仗非常的工整啊！

你认为one day和the next (day)是形容词, 修饰companies和partners, 其实不然. 这里应是副词. 举个例: 今天做朋友, 明天做敌人. “今天”和”明天”是副词修饰动词”做”. 若做形容词就是: 做今天的朋友, 做明天的敌人. 不太通吧.

对仗工整的前提是要没有歧义. 这题的难度就在看清每个词的性质, 避免歧义

在B中前半部的對稱是比A好但that are more established在多數題目是錯誤的

但我想若是A中in the Internet industry在強調產業不同的方向下移致前方

而B中最大的質疑是competing companies one day...就其他人所說one day是修飾competing companie

那該句就應該變成as competing companies may be parterns one day而不是就B所寫

以下是引用zimerman在2006-8-12 11:50:00的发言：
答案是 A

虽然A中有个软肋，就系lines of competition和in the Internet industry they的对称不够完美，但似乎也没有致命错误，倒是B中有个硬伤，就是那个one day与compete的问题鸟。。。

首先：B中的as competing companies one day may be partners the next逻辑错误，竞争对手有一天也许能成为战略伙伴the next？ A中as companies that compete
one day may be partners the next(day)很好解决了这个问题--曾经的竞争对手可能在未来成为战略伙伴；

其次：whereas 强对比关系，强调the more established industry和the internet industry中lines of competition的差异，不能简单地换成让步的although改变了原文的意思。

再次：in the more established industry > in industries that are more established(adj 优于简单定语从句原则)

做题时的确在AB上逗留了很久2mins多，最后还是利用whereas 强迫自己选了A...

最后半句话的意思是，那些竞争的公司有一天也许会变成伙伴（很清楚）

这题我选A,对了答案和前面几则讨论一度屈服于B,后来还是句意为上,选A

理由不是whereas比although好,或是in the more stablished industries优于in industries that are more established,

因为其实这些严格来讲应该都不算是什么大错误,只是我们自己猜测ETS的喜好,说不准的,

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
one day may be partners the next.

A. Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

B. Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies

C. The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

D. Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete

E. Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies

我想B最主要的错误在于 as competing companies one day may be partners the next -->这句这样讲逻辑是不通的,

as competing companies one day may be partners the next? 这句话没办法表达出原本 '互相竞争' 的公司后来变成伙伴关系

很多人提到more established industries有歧义,一开始我查点也被迷惑了.

但是,请注意,more之前有"the",所以只能是"more established" + "industries"的意思.

以下是引用vanissa在2008-6-13 17:57:00的发言：

这题我选A,对了答案和前面几则讨论一度屈服于B,后来还是句意为上,选A

理由不是whereas比although好,或是in the more stablished industries优于in industries that are more established,

因为其实这些严格来讲应该都不算是什么大错误,只是我们自己猜测ETS的喜好,说不准的,

还是看句意吧

14. GWD17-Q14: