b.
less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
c.
a smaller commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
d.
less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
had
e.
a lessening of the commitment to work and a career than their parents and
grandparents had
答案是D， 我选A。差别在于had, 我觉得不对啊，要用也用did吧，had补全不成了"had had less of ..." 可以参考大全428 ”they still expect to live better than their parents did“
2.
The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to
pursue what they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as measles and yaws.
a.
what they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
b.
what they had not previously considered a possibility -- better control, if not
eradication, of such infections like
c.
something they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not
eradication, of such infections as
d.
something not considered a previous possibility -- better control and perhaps
eradication, of other infections such as
e.
the possibility of what they had not previously considered possible -- better
control and possibly eradication
of infections like
答案是C，我选A。
我觉得C错，理由是something 后没that, infections 前没other,因为前面提到smallpox.
请NN们指教，谢谢！
关于第二题：
a，better control,of the other infections such as xxx这样的结构是错误的。这个逗号出现的很莫名，后面几个选项都提供了解决办法，就是后面是个插入语 。
b，such like ，一定错的答案；而且，what they had not previously considered a possibility 逻辑意思很绕。
e的就完全的不通了。
d，错误很多，比如perhaps eradication,是用副词修饰名词。
我不是牛，希望大家互相提高，恳请其他ggjj指正 。a，better control,of the other infections such as xxx这样的结构是错误的。这个逗号出现的很莫名，后面几个选项都提供了解决办法，就是后面是个插入语 。
b，such like ，一定错的答案；而且，what they had not previously considered a possibility 逻辑意思很绕。
e的就完全的不通了。
d，错误很多，比如perhaps eradication,是用副词修饰名词。
我不是牛，希望大家互相提高，恳请其他ggjj指正 。falileo,你好,我觉得是这样的,答案a里面的 of the other infections such as,正如你觉得的c的错误,a的错误就在the other上面,the other,一般的用法是和one一起出现,说明两个以上的,固定的同类事物的情况,就是说，有特指的意思。,one..the other(s)...,这个是托福语法上面要求的.而且，在这个句子里面，我看不出说话人要特指那个疾病的意思。
不知道你觉得怎么样？
一起进步啊
关于第一题，我觉得，最大的问题在small,这个词在英文中，是用来说明具体的事物，比如small dog，说明这个东西的形体比较小，而说明a commitment to work and a career (不知道怎么翻译适合,意思是工作义务和事业)这样的抽象名词,不用small.less ,这里是名词,意思是少量的,在英文里面,比较常用的是less of+限定词(比如定冠词)+不可数名词,表示少量的......
不知道你觉得怎么样?请指教
第二题: Others such as....ETS总是认为应该改成such...as...更简洁。OG中有两三题这样的例子。不妨作为规律记住。
第一题：谓语动词是要补出的，因为比较对象是young people have less of ...than their parents and grandparents had. 但我有一点不明白的是，按照OG的说法，第二个had应该表示 had had,及它本身是一个助动词，不是实意动词。那么正确答案就应该是用did 而非had。你确信原句是had？
同意楼上的。
我觉得还有，就是have。
have作为动词"拥有"讲的时候,可以提到句前表示疑问.就是说,具有实意动词的助动词的双重性质.所以,这里用had重复比较对象没有错.
请指教
我怎么觉得第二题的other一定要加的，逻辑上区别measles and yaws和smallpox，puzzled。。。
falileo,你好,我觉得是这样的,答案a里面的 of the other infections such as,正如你觉得的c的错误,a的错误就在the other上面,the other,一般的用法是和one一起出现,说明两个以上的,固定的同类事物的情况,就是说，有特指的意思。,one..the other(s)...,这个是托福语法上面要求的.而且，在这个句子里面，我看不出说话人要特指那个疾病的意思。
不知道你觉得怎么样？
一起进步啊
关于第一题，我觉得，最大的问题在small,这个词在英文中，是用来说明具体的事物，比如small dog，说明这个东西的形体比较小，而说明a commitment to work and a career (不知道怎么翻译适合,意思是工作义务和事业)这样的抽象名词,不用small.less ,这里是名词,意思是少量的,在英文里面,比较常用的是less of+限定词(比如定冠词)+不可数名词,表示少量的......
不知道你觉得怎么样?请指教
我觉得bluevironika讲得很好,另外谓语动词确实是需要补出来的,但是我看OG的时候好象都说less是形容词,不知道这种less of的用法出自哪里啊?
第二题的somthing后的补语成分的that可以省略的
另外such as，排除B，根据时态排除D，根据用法排除E（太冗长，possibility of直接加名词，且还改变了原句的意思）
A的错误是，the other是单数概念，后面不该用复数
关于such as
有1.such+名词/名词短语+as
2.such as 1，2，and3（表举例）
这两种用法都是可以的，
至于others用于such+名词/名词短语+as短语之间，感觉可以加上，但是不加更符合习惯
第二题的somthing后的补语成分的that可以省略的
另外such as，排除B，根据时态排除D，根据用法排除E（太冗长，possibility of直接加名词，且还改变了原句的意思）
A的错误是，the other是单数概念，后面不该用复数
关于such as
有1.such+名词/名词短语+as
2.such as 1，2，and3（表举例）
这两种用法都是可以的，
至于others用于such+名词/名词短语+as短语之间，感觉可以加上，但是不加更符合习惯
第一题,A,D的区别就在与
SMALLER LESS 上面吗?
第一题：
未划线部分：young people have
则后面得their parents and grandparents必须补出谓语动词
只有DE补出了
E：a lessening of。。。。。。不正确
只能选D了
b.
less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
c.
a smaller commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
d.
less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
had
e.
a lessening of the commitment to work and a career than their parents and
grandparents had
答案是D， 我选A。差别在于had, 我觉得不对啊，要用也用did吧，had补全不成了"had had less of ..." 可以参考大全428 ”they still expect to live better than their parents did“
2.
The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to
pursue what they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as measles and yaws.
a.
what they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
b.
what they had not previously considered a possibility -- better control, if not
eradication, of such infections like
c.
something they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not
eradication, of such infections as
d.
something not considered a previous possibility -- better control and perhaps
eradication, of other infections such as
e.
the possibility of what they had not previously considered possible -- better
control and possibly eradication
of infections like
答案是C，我选A。
我觉得C错，理由是something 后没that, infections 前没other,因为前面提到smallpox.
请NN们指教，谢谢！
Q2, 只有比较时才需要用OTHER排除，A错在THE OTHER, 不能有. the. one... the other.
Q1 主要是less和smaller比较. less好。比较结构中时态不一致,助动词必须要补出来，如果时态一致就可省略. D,E补了，但E错。"had had less of ..." 逻辑上可以是过去完成时。至少比不补强, 不补表明一般现在时。而本题比较的就是现在和过去。这样的解释可能有些牵强。
第二题的somthing后的补语成分的that可以省略的
另外such as，排除B，根据时态排除D，根据用法排除E（太冗长，possibility of直接加名词，且还改变了原句的意思）
A的错误是，the other是单数概念，后面不该用复数
关于such as
有1.such+名词/名词短语+as
2.such as 1，2，and3（表举例）
这两种用法都是可以的，
至于others用于such+名词/名词短语+as短语之间，感觉可以加上，但是不加更符合习惯
gonghao。。。
好准确地回答。。。now i understand "the other"
one more question, if i use "others" instead of "the other" in the A of the Q2, is it correct ? even it's not best..
第一题：
未划线部分：young people have
则后面得their parents and grandparents必须补出谓语动词
只有DE补出了
E：a lessening of。。。。。。不正确
只能选D了
a.
what they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
c.
something they had not previously considered possible -- better control, if not
eradication, of such infections as
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |