ChaseDream

标题: GWD 6 14 [打印本页]

作者: lunabird 时间: 2005-12-2 09:19
标题: GWD 6 14

Q14:

Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

Answer: D

What'swrong with A?

作者: laihong 时间: 2005-12-2 09:36

A 不对.结论说average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger. A中只说了average pay for jobs created 更高, 但没有考虑jobs eliminated 的薪水问题. 比如, 这些薪水很高, 被去处后就可能导致,总体平均水平下降.

其实,做这种支持题,就是找一个前提来补推理的漏洞.所以D对.

作者: shanialydia 时间: 2005-12-6 23:03

同意二楼对D的分析，可是好像A也不是因为没有考虑到jobs eliminated的问题所以错误啊

作者: lunabird 时间: 2005-12-11 07:24

谢谢laihong！

我这里前两天搜不到自己发的帖子，现在才看到。多谢指点！

作者: steveyangxt 时间: 2005-12-11 09:37
choose the m ost important factors

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)