ChaseDream

标题: GWD 6-14 [打印本页]

作者: xinfei 时间: 2005-12-1 12:26
标题: GWD 6-14

Q14:

Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

参考答案是C，C不正是起削弱的作用吗？

作者: laihong 时间: 2005-12-1 23:40
B

作者: rubioo 时间: 2005-12-2 10:58
答案是D啊

作者: xinfei 时间: 2005-12-2 11:20

我晕了，，，楼上两位NN，给点解释吧？

作者: steveyangxt 时间: 2005-12-14 20:57
选d 居民收入增长数=新增工作数乘以工资-减少的工作乘以其工资所以减少的工作的工资有决定作用。

作者: hannah1112 时间: 2006-5-7 19:38

我也支持D，但是还是不太明白，希望进来的NN能够解释得更详细一点！谢谢啦

作者: cccccc0 时间: 2006-12-19 14:11

嗯嗯~~D的吧

作者: myronx 时间: 2007-8-19 21:32
D选项说：The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide,而原题说：but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year ，而且数量还增加了，所以说明增加的总收入=增加职位的人均收入×增加职位数>减少的总收入=减少职位的人均收入×减少职位数，是成立的，因为不等式前面的两项都比不等式后面的两项大嘛

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)