Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.
In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
时在不解答案何以选C,望牛人给以解答
PS:不知有哪位好心的人给我指点一下哪有关于boldface题目资料的链接,找了好久都没有发现。
题目意思是:17世纪的后半叶的人口普查是完整的,因而发现人口数是降低的.而另一个事实是,每5年税收增加一次.由于有把人口报少的经济激励,又有报少的可行性,所以可以推测,其实人口并没有少,只是上报数字减少.
看得出来,前半段黑体是一个事实,通过推理可以得出后半段黑体的结论,而不是与结论矛盾,因而选C
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |