Heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved from the previous year, only look less appetizing than their round and red supermarket cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are more flavorful.
A. cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are
B. cousins, often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
C. cousins, often green and striped, or they have plenty of bumps and bruises, although they are
D. cousins; they are often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
E cousins; they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but they are
答案是E, 可我认为E中的they指代不明确,可能指代cousins, 但需要指代Heirloom tomatoes.从转折的意思来看,后面应该用but, 而不是although, 所以我的答案是A.但我也不确定。
如果选A,often green and striped就变成修饰cousins了,本来是应该是修饰heirloom tomatoes的。
E里面,有分号隔开,they 就是指主语heirloom tomatoes。
那e, but 后面为什么又要重复they呢?
Heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved from the previous year, only look less appetizing than their round and red supermarket cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are more flavorful.
A. cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are
B. cousins, often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
C. cousins, often green and striped, or they have plenty of bumps and bruises, although they are
D. cousins; they are often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises, although
E cousins; they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but they are
i also choose A ,because "THEIR " in the first part of the sentence is refer to "Heirloom tomatoes" , but becasse "THEY " in E refers to "supermarket cousins" . therefore cause confuse
E - they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but they are
the 2 "they" both refer to "Heirloom tomatoes" without any ambiguity and confusion.
我发现读懂句子逻辑意思对选择太重要了.
E中的THEY与第一句主语位置对称平行,不会有歧义.
A,B,C中紧接COUSINS候紧接一堆形容词,才会构成歧义的.
我发现读懂句子逻辑意思对选择太重要了.
E中的THEY与第一句主语位置对称平行,不会有歧义.
A,B,C中紧接COUSINS候紧接一堆形容词,才会构成歧义的.
支持选E!
代词有两个点个人认为比较重要:
1\在一个句子之中,最好,所有的代词均指代同一个对象,本句子中,大家都指代西红柿
2\代词的指代顺序,并不是说代词they前面发现两个复数名字,they就必须杀掉. they指代有一个优先的顺序:主句的主语>主句的宾(表)语>修饰成分中名词.这一点可以在OG和白勇的书里面看到.感觉比较管用.我们很多时候会被头脑里面红字部分的那个概念困扰.
A中同意就近修饰歧义的说法,另外A很可能导致句子变成 S ....look.....,or have...,but are...感觉比较乱,不知道这样的结构对不对,恳请指教.
same question
d的问题是they are often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises中系表结构与with介词短语用or来并列
错.
并列结构成分应该一致.分词&分词并列
定语从句&定语从句并列而不能和状语从句并列等
系表结构&介词短语并列的没见过.
我认为应该选A
前半个从句有一个their,后面再出现they,两者能一致吗?
再者,G要求表达简洁,能省的一般要省的。D中they出现了两次!
这题,我选的是b
我的看法是,在省略语法规则里,是从句when, as, although,but 等词引导的从句动词是系动词的话,主语和系动词可以一起省略。b的but后面的系动词就是这么省略的。h tomatoes为主语的句子里谓语是look,look是个系动词,b后面的 often green and striped, or with plenty of bumps and bruises都省略了主语和系动词。
而a里,but后要省没有省完,多了个are,e里they指代还是不明确,是指代tomatoes还是指代cousins呢。
A is not correct of course
the simplified structure of this long freaking sentence is that Heirloom tomatoes look...... so the following stuff is used to describe the tomatoes, so not supposed to pop up a original verb..so here in A option.."or have" is obviously wrong.. better to be or having.. "but are" is wrong again...better to be "but being"
i checked all the options, and found out only E is correct in both grammatical and according-with-origin way
同意这个说法,D中的with结构是ETS所不喜欢的,而且although是一个连词,后面应该跟一个句子的
关于D选项,or是连词, 这样with根本找不到并列项。
如果把 ‘,or’去掉的话,with我觉得语法上可能没错,直接修饰主语they
nn指点...
我发现读懂句子逻辑意思对选择太重要了.
A,B,C中紧接COUSINS候紧接一堆形容词,才会构成歧义的.
恩
没弄懂逻辑意思
OG中似乎是规定代词不可跨过分号进行指代的
一下子找不到了
E - they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but they are
the 2 "they" both refer to "Heirloom tomatoes" without any ambiguity and confusion.
different opinion
they could both refer to "tomatoes" and "cousins" I think
although there is "their" at the first clause, but in E, they still have some ambiguous meaning
理解句子本身的含义重要
up
个人觉的这题选A
HT, grown from seeds saved from the previous year, only look less appetizing than their round and red supermarket cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are more flavorful.
首先,从逻辑意思上A比较合理. HT looks.....or have plenty of b&b, 这里less appetizing 和b&b 都是形容HT比较差,相比较g&s的cousins. 相比而言觉得E的意思很奇怪
其次,从语法上动词look 和have可以并列,often green and striped修饰cousins做状语还是补语的随便......然后说but, 其实BUT 也不一定后加句子,这句but后的主语应该还是HT.当主语相同的时候,后一个主语可以省略,当然如果谓语也相同的话也可以连省略一起省(高中语法).E的话语法上的错误其实更明显些,比如they,觉的这个THEY的存在让这句话变的很烂
不过BUT的省略确定是不是被G认可的书面语,or也显的不怎么严谨...........吃力>_____<b
这道题选E,,因为逻辑。
often green and striped修饰的是Heirloom tomatoes,而不是cousins. A,B,C全都作为cousins的同位语了,就错了。
cousins是round and red的,前面已经修饰过。
abc的often green and striped 错误的修饰了cousins, 所以abc排除
although 后面应该接的是从句吧,所以bd都排除了
且原文用的语气是but, 属于强转折语气, bcd改成了although
这样就剩下e了
up
Heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved from the previous year, only look less appetizing than their round and red supermarket cousins, often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises, but are more flavorful.
A,B,C我认为是插入语进一步修饰前面的cousins,而不是同位语,但是不管怎么样是修饰cousins的,逻辑意思错误;D选项的or后面接介词with语法上是没有错的,因为with之前省略了or之前的相同的they are,所以or连接的是两个句子,with的逻辑意思在这里也说得通,只是错误出在although上,不是说它不能直接接形容词,可以的,它直接接形容词跟它接分词结构没有区别,只是需要匹配逻辑主语,这里逻辑主语也是没有问题的,只是前句的only look less appetizing 中的only说明了此句的逻辑意思不是让步而是转折。关于they的指代,不是说分号之前的their一定代表分号后面的they应该指代同样的东东,即便是一句话中物主代词和人称代词都可以指代不同的东东(可见下面的例子),只是这里分号后面的they应该优先指代前面句中的主句主语,而且在之前还有their指代的情况下: Many writers of modern English have acquired careless habits that damage the clarity of their prose, but these habits can be broken if they are willing to take the necessary trouble. (A) but these habits can be broken (B) but these habits are breakable (C) but they can break these habits (D) which can be broken (E) except that can be broken
Many writers of modern English have acquired careless habits that damage the clarity of their prose, but these habits can be broken if they are willing to take the necessary trouble.
(A) but these habits can be broken
(B) but these habits are breakable
(C) but they can break these habits
(D) which can be broken
(E) except that can be broken
thx
kankan
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |