ChaseDream

标题: GWD 17－9 [打印本页]
作者: puccamummy    时间: 2005-11-11 15:47
标题: GWD 17－9

Q9:


Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?




  • Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

  • The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

  • The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.

  • The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

  • Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

    •    Answer: B


    但我选A，请牛人指教：）

    作者: puccamummy    时间: 2005-11-11 16:44

    该帖重复。


    麻烦斑竹删除


    对不起了

    作者: yangxiaogang    时间: 2005-11-12 11:38

    这道题不明白， 请牛牛指点，多谢！

    作者: yangxiaogang    时间: 2005-11-12 22:51
    顶！
    作者: maxtan    时间: 2005-11-26 12:40
    顶！
    作者: xlina    时间: 2005-12-7 08:48
    这个贴没有重复啊。我也不懂。有人能说说吗？
    作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2005-12-13 19:29

    我认为就是选 b


    批评家说总统取消反对党所在州的一些项目是出于党派目的， 总统发言人说有些无党派人士也把这些项目的90%列为浪费，所以得出结论总统做法是正当的。b中说无党派人士没有把总统所控制的州的大部分项目也列为浪费。 把b取非， 就可以削弱。假如无党派人士没有把总统所控制的州的大部分项目也列为浪费，而总统只是取消反对党控制州的项目，很明显处于党派考虑嘛

    作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2005-12-13 19:33

    假如无党派人士（没有）把总统所控制的州的大部分项目也列为浪费，而总统只是取消反对党控制州的项目，很明显处于党派考虑嘛


    不好意思， 多了俩字

    作者: bigtone    时间: 2005-12-14 03:33
    对啊。不过怎么找不到17-19的讨论汇总帖呢？能告诉一下嘛
    作者: ly365    时间: 2006-3-26 13:45
    这题到现在我还不明白选B，请NN指点。
    作者: titatita    时间: 2006-7-20 21:52

    Q9:

    Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

     

    Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

     

    1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.无关
    2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
    3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.无关
    4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
    5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.无关

       Answer:

    我认为此题答案是d而不是b.

    首先审题:题目问的是press secretary’s argument的assumption

    press secretary’s的结论是:
                        总统的选择显然是合理的预算政策驱动的,而不是党派政治

    B选项The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.把not盖住,被认为是浪费的项目几乎都是总统的党派的.说明总统是公平的,从预算角度出发的,不是报复的.把not盖住是加强,加上not说明被取消的几乎都不是政府党派的项目,那么就都是反对党的,就是报复.是削弱的答案.

    D选项The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

    在被取消的项目中总统党派控制的不比被反对党控制的更贵.说明取消的项目是按照sound burdget来衡量的.所以是加强的.可以被认为是.assumption.

    作者: huixia06    时间: 2006-8-30 06:23

    Stongly agree


    [此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-30 6:32:06编辑过]
    作者: panglin    时间: 2006-12-17 05:42
    ding
    作者: prllrpnt    时间: 2007-7-3 20:50

    D选项The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

    在被取消的项目中总统党派控制的不比被反对党控制的更贵.说明取消的项目是按照sound burdget来衡量的.所以是加强的.可以被认为是.assumption.

    我也觉得是D

    我也觉得是D





    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3