ChaseDream

标题: GMAT-25-3请教求解思路 [打印本页]

作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-11-11 14:33
标题: GMAT-25-3请教求解思路












Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has
done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with
a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.
Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it














attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.








mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change








attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects








simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial








assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.

作者: yangsh    时间: 2005-11-11 15:54

C


作者: deanjiang    时间: 2005-11-11 16:52

B


因果倒置。


Mel: ban-> decline of teaching


Pat: no teaching-> the ban has no effect.


大家讨论。



作者: 不知不觉    时间: 2005-11-12 12:40

题目本来的答案是什么?


作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-11-13 08:39
给出的答案是:A。我现在拿不准是A还是C.
作者: 不知不觉    时间: 2005-11-13 12:47

偶也分不清是A还是C


作者: yangsh    时间: 2005-11-14 13:59
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best


Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has


done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with


a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.


Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few


judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative


effect.


仔细看时态,A有道理。但我认为C也有道理。
作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2005-12-17 14:55

哦第一眼选 a 看到 c也不好。


文中由禁止moonlighting 推出法案是没有改善效果的


c中说出moonlighting 没影响到几个人推出法案是有效的


既然前面有一个前提能推出结论,那马后面推翻前提, 也就可以推翻结论。


应该选a   现在搞外快的人是少,但是可能以后大家嫌工资太少说不定还想搞呢。所以很有可能有了这个ban 后,收入没有改观。



作者: rosmarine    时间: 2006-6-3 09:20
应该是C啊:
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects

certain change就是指raise the salary
possitive effect就是指does improve the situation
absence of negative effects就是指since few judgs teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect

多完美的对应啊!



作者: sabrina07    时间: 2007-1-10 20:48

C说得很清楚啊!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-10 20:52:04编辑过]





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3