ChaseDream

标题: GWD- 29-19寻求解题思路 [打印本页]

作者: sv2000 时间: 2005-11-10 18:24
标题: GWD- 29-19寻求解题思路

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.

Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible

People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.

作者: yangsh 时间: 2005-11-10 20:52

哪里来的gwd29?!!!

the answer is C.

原文说：酗酒的人在安全敏感的岗位上，工厂事故就多。即使经过治疗，酗酒的人仍然比其他人更容易喝酒。结论：为了减少事故，应当禁止经过drinking治疗的人在安全岗位上。

答案，如果喝酒的人去治疗则会永久失去工作，因此他们会掩盖这个事实，而保证更久的工作。[隐含：会导致工厂事故更多]

作者: howardwang 时间: 2005-11-11 00:03

支持C

作者: yangxiaogang 时间: 2005-11-11 02:31

C is right

作者: sv2000 时间: 2005-11-11 08:49

谢谢2楼。是不是答案C可以这么理解：Worker(定语：对饮酒问题有治疗的工人<如果老板发现>将永久的开除他们-这些工人)尝试着隐藏他们饮酒这个事实，尽可能的长时间留在工作职位上<因他们经常饮酒，所以可能导致事故>。

作者: yangsh 时间: 2005-11-11 10:16
对。

作者: LunarLin 时间: 2005-11-14 10:50
肯定是C

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)