Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.
In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
为什么选C````偶选的是D``请各位NN帮帮忙``
这题我也选出D
我个人以为历史学家的观点是
1600的时候人中记录是不完备的,因为连人口数字都出错了,存在广泛的人口少报的问题,所以第一句黑体是历史学家挑战的观点
而第二句话说人口记录中表现的人口下降是假象,所以这是历史学家的论据,
大声疾呼"哪位NN来这旮旯帮一下忙啊!!!"
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&replyid=68728&id=68728&page=1&skin=0&Star=1
MM还是看讨论贴比较好,NN都在讨论贴里面出现了,现在等NN比较难等的.
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |