GWD 21-28
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. (E)
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
I choose d, but the answer given is e. where can I get the discussion of the answers of gwd21?
? 我也选D啊
再多点人来,看看都选什么?
是D阿~我的那份答案上就写的D
今天才作了的
我也选了D,不过请问楼上的,那个‘最后答案’在哪里能下到?
我也是D
嗨!DD
D too! 又多对了一个的感觉太好了!
唉,看不到回复,顶一下吧
第一部分的黑体内容是evidence还是conclusion?
puzzled...
我也觉得有问题, 第一部分的黑体内容就半句来说不可能是conclusion,
, 除非把这句 those worrisome rumors must be false.也加成黑体!
I don't think D is a good answer. The second bold face can not be a main conclusion.
I prefer to choose C although the noun ,"the evidence", in this sectence is not good.
But I think the "undermine" is the key function of this sectence
several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank-->top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness-->those worrisome rumors must be false
D is correct. the BF is the intermediate conclusion that forms part of the evidence that leads to the final conclusion.
the 2nd BF doesn't undermine the first conclusion. it's purely a judgment or a conclusion.
什么是 "intermediate conclusion "?
为什么第一部分是结论?
答案是哪个
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |