ChaseDream

标题: 揽瓜阁训练营第九十四天（含CR，RC和DI题目） [打印本页]

作者: 小白斩鸡 时间: 2024-3-28 09:40
标题: 揽瓜阁训练营第九十四天（含CR，RC和DI题目）
之前大家对揽瓜阁精读的反馈很好，就想着自己的时间开始把一些精读的文章根据JJ出题目～然后focus上线，IR需求大家也大。就想着把揽瓜阁的阅读逻辑 IR 都放在这贴里打卡

每日的解析在揽瓜阁2024群更新

RC题源：揽瓜阁精读的文章+机经的题目
CR题源：本月中文JJ改编
IR题源：往届鸡精改编

打卡内容：
一周打卡五篇，科目不限。
每天上午管理员群内发布题目，群成员做完提交打卡，第二天发布解析

打卡内容建议：
阅读：写文章结构、笔记
逻辑：写逻辑链分析
IR：写做题思路和选项分析

【现在你的笔记越全，越能帮助你捋清思路，之后回顾总结。】
打卡方式：
可以在论坛留言区打卡，截图到群内
也可以在小红书/微博打卡，需写明任务内容是哪篇，并带上#揽瓜阁 #LGG #lgg 的 tag，截图到群内。

考试群：
GMAT入群／揽瓜阁入群方式：https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html

公众号：1.考什么试
2.商校百科

申请群

1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请／校友答疑／面试群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-863011-1-1.html
2.英国，新加坡，美国，香港，德国商科申请群：
请加小白斩鸡进群（killgmat）
3. 行业分享交流／职业规划群：
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388171-1-1.html

小红书：
1.留学+考试最新消息关注妥妥妥了（小红书号：323014154）
2.求职+MBA 最新消息关注元（小红书号：8954043300

1.CR
A clothing company has developed a new detergent product, A, which can effectively remove fuzz and prevent discoloration in fibers that occur over time with regular wear. The company concludes that this new product will be successful in the market. Which of the following assumptions is necessary for the success of this marketing plan?
A. The detergent will not damage the unaffected parts of the clothing while removing fuzz and preventing discoloration.
B. Consumers are actively seeking solutions for fuzz and discoloration in clothes.
C. The cost of producing the new detergent is not significantly higher than that of regular detergents.
D. Competing companies do not have a similar product already available in the market.
E. The new detergent is compatible with a wide range of fabrics and clothing types.

In a certain country, when fishermen catch a large amount of fish, the price tends to be low due to high supply. Conversely, when the catch is small, the supply is low, leading to higher prices. Recently, there was a forecast of a storm, resulting in fewer fish being sold and a drop in prices. Which of the following assumptions is necessary to explain this contradiction?
A. Fishermen, anticipating the storm, rushed to sell their catch quickly, leading to a surplus in the market.
B. The demand for fish decreases significantly during storm forecasts.
C. The quality of fish caught just before a storm is perceived to be lower, affecting prices.
D. Transportation and distribution channels for fish are disrupted during storm forecasts.
E. Consumers tend to stock up on fish before a storm, leading to an increased demand after the storm.

答案:

2.Di

In recent years, the Chinese government has prioritized the development of the Greater Bay Area (GBA), a megalopolis consisting of nine cities in Guangdong Province, along with the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau. The GBA has a combined GDP of approximately $1.6 trillion, making it one of the world's most economically powerful regions. The Chinese government aims to leverage the GBA's strengths in finance, technology, and manufacturing to create a globally competitive innovation hub.

One key initiative is the development of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link (XRL), a high-speed railway connecting these major cities. The XRL has reduced travel times significantly, with the journey from Hong Kong to Guangzhou now taking a mere 47 minutes, compared to over 2 hours previously. This enhanced connectivity is expected to foster greater economic integration and talent exchange within the GBA.

However, challenges remain in integrating the different legal, financial, and social systems of mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. For instance, Hong Kong's common law system and Macau's civil law system differ from mainland China's legal framework. Additionally, the three regions have separate currencies, with Hong Kong using the Hong Kong Dollar (HKD), Macau using the Macanese Pataca (MOP), and mainland China using the Renminbi (RMB). Navigating these differences will be crucial for businesses operating across the GBA.

Despite these challenges, the GBA's potential is immense. The region is home to numerous technology giants, such as Huawei, Tencent, and DJI, as well as prestigious universities like the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen. With a population of over 70 million and a combined GDP larger than that of many countries, the GBA is poised to become a global economic powerhouse in the coming years.

1. Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of the passage?

A. To highlight the economic disparities between mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau

B. To discuss the potential and challenges of developing the Greater Bay Area

C. To compare the legal systems of mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau

D. To analyze the impact of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link

2. According to the passage, which of the following is NOT mentioned as a challenge in integrating the Greater Bay Area?

A. Differences in legal systems between mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau

B. The use of separate currencies in the three regions

C. The lack of high-speed rail connectivity between the major cities

D. Navigating the different social systems of the three regions

3. Based on the information provided in the passage, which of the following can be inferred about the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link?

A. It has increased travel times between Hong Kong and Guangzhou

B. It is expected to promote economic integration within the Greater Bay Area

C. It connects Hong Kong and Macau, but not mainland China

D. It has had a limited impact on talent exchange within the region

4. The passage suggests that the Greater Bay Area has a competitive advantage in all of the following sectors EXCEPT:

A. Finance

B. Technology

C. Manufacturing

D. Agriculture

5. According to the passage, which of the following statements about the Greater Bay Area's GDP is true?

A. It is smaller than that of most countries

B. It is approximately $1.6 trillion

C. It is primarily driven by the manufacturing sector

D. It is expected to decline in the coming years

6. The passage mentions all of the following companies as examples of technology giants in the Greater Bay Area EXCEPT:

A. Huawei

B. Tencent

C. DJI

D. Alibaba

7. Which of the following can be inferred about the relationship between the Greater Bay Area's population and its economic potential?

A. The GBA's large population is seen as a hindrance to its economic growth

B. The GBA's population is relatively small compared to other major economic regions

C. The GBA's substantial population contributes to its immense economic potential

D. The passage does not discuss the relationship between population and economic potential in the GBA

8. The author's tone in the passage can best be described as:

A. Optimistic about the Greater Bay Area's potential despite acknowledging the challenges

B. Skeptical about the Greater Bay Area's ability to overcome integration challenges

C. Neutral and unbiased in presenting information about the Greater Bay Area

D. Critical of the Chinese government's efforts to develop the Greater Bay Area

9. Which of the following best describes the organizational structure of the passage?

A. Chronological order

B. Cause and effect

C. Problem and solution

D. Balanced analysis of advantages and disadvantages

10. Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about the author's view on the future of the Greater Bay Area?

A. The author is uncertain about the GBA's future prospects

B. The author believes the GBA will become a global economic powerhouse despite challenges

C. The author thinks the integration challenges will prevent the GBA from reaching its full potential

D. The author does not express a clear view on the GBA's future prospects

[/hide]

[/hide]

3.RC
The rise and fall of corporate diversification over the past four decades remains an unresolved question in financial economics. Despite several plausible explanations, there is little more than anecdotal evidence to support or refute any of them. One of the most enduring explanations is the "antitrust hypothesis," which suggests that firms diversified in the 1960s due to antitrust authorities preventing them from expanding in their home industries. When antitrust policy became less stringent in the 1980s, firms were able to expand horizontally, leading to de-diversification and a focus on their core business.

Stigler (1966) was one of the first to present evidence on the antitrust hypothesis, concluding that the 1950 Merger Act had a strong adverse effect on horizontal mergers by large companies. Shleifer and Vishny (1991) speculated that the most likely reason for diversification in the 1960s was the antitrust policy that turned fiercely against mergers between firms in the same industry after the Celler-Kefauver Act passed in 1950. Unable to acquire businesses related to their own, cash-rich acquirers bought companies outside their industries. However, skeptics like Scherer (1980) and Comment and Jarrell (1995) note that diversification appears to be common in countries with significantly different antitrust policies than the United States.

This paper aims to empirically assess the antitrust hypothesis. If the hypothesis is correct, there should have been a relatively high fraction of diversification acquisitions among large mergers and a relatively low fraction among small mergers during the conglomerate merger wave of the 1960s and 1970s. However, an analysis of 549 mergers by NYSE firms during 1968 does not support this implication, as diversification was no more common among large mergers than small mergers. The finding is robust to different measures of diversification and holds for samples of mergers during 1971 and 1974.

Furthermore, an examination of diversification patterns in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and France in the late 1960s and early 1970s reveals that these countries also experienced diversification waves, despite not having legal restrictions on horizontal growth comparable to those in the United States. This corroborates the negative view of the antitrust hypothesis that emerges from the American data. While antitrust may have played a role in some decisions, the evidence suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies elsewhere.

1. What is the main idea of the passage?
A. The antitrust hypothesis is the most plausible explanation for corporate diversification.
B. The rise and fall of corporate diversification remain an unresolved question in financial economics.
C. Antitrust policy was the primary cause of corporate diversification in the 1960s and 1970s.
D. Corporate diversification was more common in countries with less stringent antitrust policies.
E. The evidence suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies outside of antitrust policy.

2. According to the passage, what did Stigler (1966) conclude about the 1950 Merger Act?
A. It had a strong adverse effect on horizontal mergers by large companies.
B. It encouraged firms to diversify into unrelated industries.
C. It had little impact on corporate diversification.
D. It led to the rise of conglomerates in the United States.
E. It was less stringent than antitrust policies in other countries.

3. What did Shleifer and Vishny (1991) speculate about the reason for diversification in the 1960s?
A. Firms diversified due to the favorable market for equity issues.
B. Antitrust policy turned fiercely against mergers between firms in the same industry after the Celler-Kefauver Act passed in 1950.
C. Firms were flush with cash and unable to acquire businesses related to their own.
D. Diversification was more common in countries with different antitrust policies than the United States.
E. Firms diversified to avoid the adverse effects of the 1950 Merger Act.

4. According to the passage, what did the analysis of 549 mergers by NYSE firms during 1968 reveal?
A. Diversification was more common among large mergers than small mergers.
B. Diversification was no more common among large mergers than small mergers.
C. The antitrust hypothesis was supported by the data.
D. The finding was not robust to different measures of diversification.
E. The results did not hold for samples of mergers during 1971 and 1974.

5. What do the diversification patterns in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and France in the late 1960s and early 1970s suggest about the antitrust hypothesis?
A. These countries had legal restrictions on horizontal growth comparable to those in the United States.
B. The diversification waves in these countries support the antitrust hypothesis.
C. Antitrust policy was the primary cause of corporate diversification in these countries.
D. The diversification waves in these countries, despite not having legal restrictions on horizontal growth comparable to those in the United States, corroborate the negative view of the antitrust hypothesis.
E. The evidence from these countries suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies in antitrust policy.

6. According to the passage, what do skeptics like Scherer (1980) and Comment and Jarrell (1995) note about diversification?
A. Diversification is less common in countries with different antitrust policies than the United States.
B. Diversification appears to be common in countries with significantly different antitrust policies than the United States.
C. Antitrust policy is the primary cause of corporate diversification in countries other than the United States.
D. The antitrust hypothesis is supported by evidence from countries other than the United States.
E. Diversification is more common in the United States than in other countries.

7. What can be inferred from the passage about the role of antitrust policy in corporate diversification?
A. Antitrust policy was the sole factor in all corporate diversification decisions.
B. Antitrust policy played no role whatsoever in corporate diversification decisions.
C. While antitrust policy may have played a role in some decisions, the evidence suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies elsewhere.
D. Antitrust policy was more important in corporate diversification decisions in the United States than in other countries.
E. The role of antitrust policy in corporate diversification decisions remains unclear.

8. What is the author's stance on the antitrust hypothesis as an explanation for corporate diversification?
A. The author fully supports the antitrust hypothesis.
B. The author is neutral towards the antitrust hypothesis.
C. The author suggests that the antitrust hypothesis is the most plausible explanation for corporate diversification.
D. The author is skeptical of the antitrust hypothesis and suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies elsewhere.
E. The author does not express a clear stance on the antitrust hypothesis.

作者: pinx 时间: 2024-3-28 10:33
感谢分享！

作者: momomo219 时间: 2024-3-28 10:42
CR 1.a new detergent product remove fuzz and prevent discoloration in fibers导致successful in the market，assumption要补足这个逻辑链，一定是市场需要这个新特质，所以推出后才能受到市场欢迎。所以选B. Consumers are actively seeking solutions for fuzz and discoloration in clothes.
2前提：supply上升，price下降；supply下降，price上升。但是fewer fish being sold and a drop in prices，所以一定有别的原因导致更少的鱼卖出的同时价格还下降了，所以C. The quality of fish caught just before a storm is perceived to be lower, affecting prices.

作者: Yeelin椰林 时间: 2024-3-28 10:52
【RC】
EABBDBCD
结构：
1、主流的corporate diversification原因推论是antitrust hypothesis。
2、假说的依据。
3、本文审慎评估该假说。
4、数据表明尽管antitrust hypothesis在corporate diversification中扮演重要角色，但其主要原因有待研究。

作者: Kalendstyyyyyy 时间: 2024-3-28 11:50
看一下！

作者: 芋圆子 时间: 2024-3-28 12:04
da
bcbdb dcadb
baebd bcd

作者: 芋圆子 时间: 2024-3-28 12:08

芋圆子发表于 2024-3-28 12:04
da
bcbdb dcadb
baebd bcd

第一道逻辑纠结半天还是错了

作者: Kalendstyyyyyy 时间: 2024-3-28 12:54
CR
D(A)A

RC
B(E)ABBDBCD

作者: 徐公子~ 时间: 2024-3-28 13:00
CR1
我的答案：A
正确答案：A
P：新产品可以解决长期穿着引起的起球和褪色
C：公司认为新产品会成功
任务类型：前提
预判分析：不会不成功，不会有副作用抵消甚至超过优点
选项分析
A：新产品在处理起球和褪色问题时，不会破坏其他区域
B：消费者在积极寻找解决起球和褪色问题的洗涤剂
C：产品是否成功与成本关系不大
D：产品是否成功与竞品关系不大
E：产品可以广泛适用于各种织物

CR2
我的答案：B
正确答案：A
P：产量大时价格低，产量低时价格高
C：天气预报会有风暴，造成鱼销售减少，价格也下滑
预判：能同时解释销量下降和价格下降
选项分析
A：渔民积极抛售——应该是销量增加，价格下降
B：需求降了——能解释销量下降，价格下降
C：人们认为风暴前捕的鱼质量不好，导致价格下降——不能解释销量下降
D：运输和销售网络破坏——导致销量下降，不能解释价格下降
E：风暴后需求上涨——无关

RC
我的答案：EABBDBCD
正确答案：EABBDBCD
文章结构：
P1-介绍理论界对企业多元经营成败原因的一个解释“反垄断假说”
P2-解释反垄断假说
P3-作者通过美国市场实证研究发现反垄断假说不成立
P4-在其他反垄断法律完全不同的地区也发现了大量多元经营案例，证明多元经营的主要E原因并非反垄断

作者: sunsair 时间: 2024-3-28 14:36
AB
第一题选A是很明显的，不伤害衣物是洗衣液的基本要求。其他的都只能算weaken。
第二题不太确定，选B是因为需求跟价格是强相关的，其他的多少没有需求的影响力那么大。并且需求下降确实会导致销售量和价格都下跌。

作者: 为了G700 时间: 2024-3-28 15:00
Day94 CR
第一题，加强，❌选B，答案A。市场成功的必要条件。
P：一家服装公司开发了一种新的洗涤剂产品A，它可以有效去除绒毛，防止经常穿着时纤维变色。
C:这款新产品将在市场上取得成功。

A.洗涤剂不会损坏衣服未受影响的部分，同时去除绒毛并防止变色.(产品品质不是市场战略）
B.消费者正在积极寻求解决衣服绒毛和变色的解决方案.(说明有需求而且市场类似产品不多。）
C.生产新洗涤剂的成本并不明显高于普通洗涤剂.(销售价格而不是成本影响市场)
D.竞争公司在市场上没有类似的产品。(没有竞争者的产品未必一定成功）
E.这种新型洗涤剂与各种织物和服装类型兼容。(产品属性和市场成功相隔有点距离）

第二题，解释题，选A. 解释为什么供应和价格不是正相关。
P:在某个国家，当渔民捕捞大量鱼类时，由于供应量大，价格往往很低。相反，当渔获量少时，供应量低，导致价格上涨。
C:最近，有预报将发生暴风雨，导致出售的鱼减少和价格下跌。

A.渔民们预料到暴风雨，急于迅速出售他们的渔获，导致市场过剩.(暴风雨带来的不是供应减少，而是出售的鱼是增加的，那么价格低了。）
B.在风暴预报期间，对鱼类的需求显着减少.(需求减少，同时供应减少，未必带来价格下跌。）
C.在暴风雨来临前捕获的鱼的质量被认为较低，从而影响了价格.(引入鱼的质量影响了价格，但是没有直接解释供应和价格的关系）
D.在暴风雨预报期间，鱼类的运输和分销渠道中断.(供应减少，价格上升）
E.消费者倾向于在暴风雨来临前囤积鱼类，导致暴风雨过后需求增加.(囤积会导致需求增加，不能解释）

作者: Itsyy 时间: 2024-3-28 15:32
看一下

作者: gmatcantkillme 时间: 2024-3-28 15:33
Day 94
CR
1. 逻辑链：New product can remove fuzz & prevent discoloration—- product can be successful （正确答案A）
A）无关
B）正确
C）无关
D）无关
E）无关
2. 逻辑链：price low when supply is high and vice versa —- storm, less fish but lower price
A) 正确
B）无关
C）无关
D）无关
E）相反

RC
P1： antitrust less strict, able to expand, de-diversification
P2: 1950 Merger Act has adverse effect. Unable to acquire, however, diversification also popular in other countries
P3: study examined the theory larger merger is high and small merger is low —- wrong
P4: other countries also diversification with no legal restriction. Primary cause is not antitrust
EABB DBCD

作者: 刘如是 时间: 2024-3-28 16:40
1

作者: Estella_j 时间: 2024-3-28 17:01
rc:
BABBDBCD

作者: 豆奶 时间: 2024-3-28 19:51
看一下！

作者: Alexandra-GMAT 时间: 2024-3-28 21:04
看一下！

作者: 绝不白花钱 时间: 2024-3-29 05:49
CR BB
P: A can effectively remove fuzz and prevent discoloration in fibers
C: this new product will be successful in the market.
Q:A 一个产品在市场上能否成功取决于消费者
A 有点纠结
B 如果消费者没有在寻找这两个问题的解决办法说明产品本身不被消费者需要，也就不会有市场上的成功
C 无关
D 无关
E 无关只要与一个种类相关，它就是成功的，不要求针对广泛的消费市场

P: lower supply--higher price
C: few fish sold--drop in prices
Q:Ex
A.Maybe，但是并不能解释为什么fewer dish being sold
B.能解释为什么卖出的鱼更少并且价格很低
C.影响价格没有提到对于卖出数量减少的解释
D.无关
E. 无关

作者: Eunice12 时间: 2024-3-29 08:46
DI
我的选项：BCBDBDCADB
正确选项：
文章结构
P1 GBA的概述
P2 建立了XRL→好的影响
P3 GBA的挑战：法律体系、金融、社会体系
P4 GBA的潜力是巨大的

作者: xuelin99 时间: 2024-3-29 10:56
同意！

作者: xuelin99 时间: 2024-3-29 11:04
1.前提
P：新产品可以解决长期穿着导致的起球和褪色
C：新产品会成功
A：处理起球和褪色问题时，不会破坏其他
B：消费者在找解决起球和褪色问题的洗涤剂
C：与成本关系不大
D：与竞品关系不大
E：产品可以适用于各种衣服
我的答案：A 正确答案：A
2.
P：产量大时价格低，产量低时价格高
C：天气预报会有风暴，造成鱼销售减少，价格也下滑
我的答案：A 正确答案：A
A：渔民积极抛售，反了
B：需求降了，无关
C：风暴前捕的鱼质量不好，导致价格下降，备选
D：运输和销售网破坏，导致销量下降，备选
E：需求上涨，无关
我的答案：C 正确答案：A

作者: Jacksonlau24 时间: 2024-3-29 13:23
感谢

作者: machopliii 时间: 2024-3-30 12:07
接考试高分，冲梦想学校

作者: Maxxiemoo00 时间: 2024-3-30 13:43
CR
1、A 取反直接削弱
2、供给少，价格高。暴风雨来临，供给少，价格却低了
A、渔民密集供给导致市场供给过剩，正选
B、需求骤减，无关
C、品质下降D运输，无关
E、需求增长，无法解释

RC EABBDBCB
DI BCBDBDCADB

作者: tdcq1993 时间: 2024-3-30 15:02
RC
第1段：关于公司多元化的解释有很多，但基本没有直接的证据证明。其中最长久的一个解释是反垄断假说。当反垄断法严格时，大公司无法兼并本行业的小公司，从而进行了多元化的发展。
第2段：S发现反垄断法有效遏制了公司的兼并，S和V认为是反垄断法遏制兼并从而造成了多元化。但是S和C和J发现，很多国家的反垄断法不一样时，公司多元化也很常见。
第3段：如果反垄断的假说成立，大公司的多元化会比小公司多，但是NYSE的调查结果不是这个情况。
第4段：其他一些国家，没有严格的反垄断法，同样经历了多元化的发展，所以原因还在其他地方。
E、A、B、B、D、B、C、D

CR
一个服装公司开发了一款洗衣液，可以去除绒毛并保护衣服清洗时不褪色
这个公司断定这款产品肯定能成功
问assumption
A：这款产品不会损坏衣服的其他部分

在一个国家，当捕鱼量大时，鱼的价格就低；当捕鱼量小时，鱼的价格就高
最近有一个风暴将近，卖了很少的鱼，价格也降低了
A：这样的话鱼应该会卖得多
选了B：需求降低了
C：质量下降了可能需求也大
D：价格应该上升

作者: 我是小酥皮 时间: 2024-3-30 17:12
CR：B C （正确答案：A A）
1）方案推理
P：公司新产品A可去毛和固色
C：公司认为此产品会成功
2）因果推理
P：某国捕鱼量大时价格低，量小时价格涨。而风暴后导致的鱼量减少时，价格却也在下降
Q：why

RC：E A B B D B C D
P1：对企业多元化兴衰的解释；反垄断假说
P2：举例不同时期各人观点结论
P3：本文实证评估反垄断假说
P4：对比各国得出结论

作者: 为了G700 时间: 2024-3-30 20:44
Day 94 RC
P1:过去四十年来，企业多元化的兴衰仍是一个没解决的问题。有一种解释是反垄断的猜想。
P2: S（1966）呈现证据说反垄断有一个副作用在并购上，同行业公司不允许并购。但是在反垄断政策与美国截然不同的国家，多元化似乎很常见。
P3: 假如这个猜想是对的，那么在大的并购会比小的并购获得高比率的多元化，但是实际上在大型合并中，多元化并不比小型合并更常见。
P4: 进一步，在其他国家的多元化测试解释了这些国家也经历了多元化的浪潮，尽管他们没有严格的法律反龙段，这个证实了反垄断在一些决定中发挥了作用，但是并不是多元化的主要原因。

1.❌B，答案E。看清楚全文就能知道答案。
2.A，第二段。
3.B，第二段。
4.B，第三段。
5.D，最后一段。
6.B，第二段最后一句。
7.C，最后一段最后一句。
8.D，最后一段。

关键词：
plausible：合理
anecdotal：传闻
enduring：持久
antitrust hypothesis：反垄断假说
stringent：严格
de-diversification：去多元化
skeptics：怀疑
adverse effect：副作用
corroborate：证实

作者: Katelynns 时间: 2024-3-30 20:47
CR:1. B AB纠结，取否对比，B更加迎合新产品会成功，因为消费者一直在寻找能够解决这两大难题的产品。但A更根本，解决了两大问题，不能把衣服洗坏了。我还是选了B 等解析～
2. B
RC： BABBD BCD
DI： BCBDB DDADB

作者: 杨翠花 时间: 2024-3-30 22:11
Mark一下！

作者: 杨翠花 时间: 2024-3-30 22:30
CR，答题卡：AB，答案：AA
1. P：新的洗涤产品，可以remove fuzz 而且防止染色
C：这个新产品会火
assumption题，取非削弱，立场：这个新产品不会火
选B取非：消费者没有在极力寻找remove fuzz 和防止染色的产品【没有需求，所以不会火】
纠结选项A取非：这个产品会破坏其他正常的地方，当用来remove fuzz 和防染色的时候【推出这个产品副作用很大，本身有缺陷不会火】

2. P：鱼多价格低，鱼少价格高
C：预测有台风，鱼少但是价格下降
原因解释题
我选B：基于台风预测，鱼的需求显著下降

RC，答题卡：BABBDBCD，答案：EABBDBCD

1. 文章主旨题：文章主旨题，写了antitrust理论的内容，以及不同的发现，最后说主要因素不是antitrust
2. 定位第二段：concluding that the 1950 Merger Act had a strong adverse effect on horizontal mergers by large companies.
3. 定位第二段：hleifer and Vishny (1991) speculated that the most likely reason for diversification in the 1960s was the antitrust policy that turned fiercely against mergers between firms in the same industry
4. 定位第三段：owever, an analysis of 549 mergers by NYSE firms during 1968 does not support this implication, as diversification was no more common among large mergers than small mergers.
5. 定位最后一段
6. 定位第二段
7. 定位最后一句
8. 定位最后一句

作者: 有机盐 时间: 2024-3-30 23:12
Mark一下！

作者: heyrebex 时间: 2024-3-31 10:11
看一下！

作者: Dimplerosie 时间: 2024-3-31 10:34
看一下！

作者: longxuw 时间: 2024-3-31 10:43
CR:AC

作者: Dimplerosie 时间: 2024-3-31 10:58
Mar 31st
CR:
A clothing company has developed a new detergent product, A, which can effectively remove fuzz and prevent discoloration in fibers that occur over time with regular wear. The company concludes that this new product will be successful in the market. Which of the following assumptions is necessary for the success of this marketing plan?
A. The detergent will not damage the unaffected parts of the clothing while removing fuzz and preventing discoloration.
B. Consumers are actively seeking solutions for fuzz and discoloration in clothes.
C. The cost of producing the new detergent is not significantly higher than that of regular detergents.
D. Competing companies do not have a similar product already available in the market.
E. The new detergent is compatible with a wide range of fabrics and clothing types.
1. C: the new product will be successful in the market
P: a new detergent product remove fuzz and prevent discoloration in fibers
我的答案：B
标准答案：A
预判分析：伤害衣物（取反直接削弱）。不会不成功，不会有副作用抵消甚至超过优点

In a certain country, when fishermen catch a large amount of fish, the price tends to be low due to high supply. Conversely, when the catch is small, the supply is low, leading to higher prices. Recently, there was a forecast of a storm, resulting in fewer fish being sold and a drop in prices. Which of the following assumptions is necessary to explain this contradiction?
A. Fishermen, anticipating the storm, rushed to sell their catch quickly, leading to a surplus in the market.
B. The demand for fish decreases significantly during storm forecasts.
C. The quality of fish caught just before a storm is perceived to be lower, affecting prices.
D. Transportation and distribution channels for fish are disrupted during storm forecasts.
E. Consumers tend to stock up on fish before a storm, leading to an increased demand after the storm.
2. C: 风暴导致更少的🐟出售，价格下降
P:产量大时价格低，产量低时价格高
我的答案：C
标准答案：A
A：渔民积极抛售——应该是销量增加，价格下降
B：需求降了——能解释销量下降，价格下降
C：人们认为风暴前捕的鱼质量不好，导致价格下降——不能解释销量下降
D：运输和销售网络破坏——导致销量下降，不能解释价格下降
E：风暴后需求上涨——无关

DI：
我的答案：BCBDB DCCDD
标准答案：BCBDB DCCDD

RC:
P1- corporate diversification被“antitrust hypothesis"： antitrust policy👇firm👆de-diversification解释
主流的corporate diversification原因推论是antitrust hypothesis
P2-
• Stigler第一个支持
• Shleifer and Vishny: antitrust policy turned fiercely against mergers between firms→unable to acquire businesses related to their own
• Scherer and Comment and Jarrell: 其他国家也有（反对Shleifer and Vishnny)
假说的依据
P3-NYSE的例子反对
本文审慎评估该假说
P4-UK Canada Germany and France反对
数据表明尽管antitrust hypothesis在corporate diversification中扮演重要角色，但其主要原因有待研究
我的答案：EACBD BCD
标准答案：EABBD BCD

作者: leiyaqing1992 时间: 2024-3-31 17:29
Mark一下！

作者: leiyaqing1992 时间: 2024-3-31 17:43
图

作者: Jamie_ee 时间: 2024-3-31 19:29
CR
1. Assumption
Detergent product - remove fuzz, prevent discoloration - successful
选A，取反很容易判断，B的话没A好

2. Assumption
High supply - low price
Low supply - high price
Low supply - low price
选A，一来一回也最后是high supply导致的low price

作者: setmefree1 时间: 2024-3-31 22:17
DAY94
CR
AC
RC
BABBDBCD
- 企业多元化兴衰未解决问题，没有证据支持、反对相关的解释
- S反垄断假设
- 文章从经验上评估反垄断假设
- 尽管反垄断在某些决策中发挥作用，但是证据表明企业多元化的主要原因在于其他方面

作者: qian0324 时间: 2024-3-31 22:33
CR
1, B错选A
题干：某公司新出了一个洗衣液，可以remove fuzz以及防掉色。预测新产品会成功。问assumption.
选项：
A：这个洗洁精不会影响其他未染色的部分（取非：洗洁精在本身作用之外会影响其他部分那就成了负面产品了）
B: 消费者正在找这样一个产品

2, A
题干：渔民抓鱼多价格就降，反之涨。最近预测要暴雨，导致了捕鱼量减少同时价格下降。问哪个assumption能解释这个现象。
选项：
A: 预测到暴雨的渔民抓紧卖鱼导致市场供给过剩。

RC
文章结构：
P1 主流观点认为是反垄断法促进了公司的多样化。
P2 S支持反垄断法假设。后边一个sc C和J则持怀疑态度。
P3 如果反垄断法假设是正确的，那么理论上应该是大公司的多样性比例高于小公司，然而事实并非如此。所以实际情况是否定反垄断法推测的。
P4 在没有反垄断法的国家也同样出现了多样化的情况。所多样化的原因并不是反垄断法，还有需找到其他原因。

做题：
E; A; B; B; D; B; C; D;

作者: Grapey 时间: 2024-3-31 22:54
打卡

作者: 陌小夏 时间: 2024-4-1 15:40
DAY93
CR B（A）B（A）
1-assumptions plan-aim
A取反后：The detergent will  damage the unaffected parts of the clothing while removing fuzz and preventing discoloration.手段有明显的副作用。
B取反后：Consumers are not actively seeking solutions for fuzz and discoloration in clothes 从需求出发，消费者没有积极的需求，我觉得供需更根本。
C无关
D有竞争对手不代表就没市场
E取反The new detergent is  notcompatible with a wide range of fabrics and clothing types.没有和广泛的材质兼容，人家走的可能是细分的材质赛道。

2-解释果因推论
矛盾  the price tends to be low due to high supply；the supply is low, leading to higher prices
结果：fewer fish being sold and a drop in prices
A：与前提不符
B：与题干的供需价格强相关：雷雨天需求极大减少，导致价格下降。需求决定价格

RC E A B B D B C D
1-The rise and fall of corporate diversification over the past four decades remains an unresolved question in financial economics.the most enduring explanations is the "antitrust hypothesis,"antitrust 反垄断的
2-antitrust hypothesis的支持者和反对者
3- empirically assess the antitrust hypothesis ：经验分析并不符合这一假设
4-欧美其他国家栗子表面 While antitrust may have played a role in some decisions, the evidence suggests that the primary cause of corporate diversification lies elsewhere.

作者: Dreambig13 时间: 2024-4-1 16:36

作者: entertaininguse 时间: 2024-4-2 11:52
看一下！

作者: Perilla 时间: 2024-4-3 13:59
Day94
1. CR
A
P：服装公司开发新的洗涤剂产品（能除绒毛，防退色）
C：公司认为新产品将在市场大获成功
假设
A. 洗涤剂不会破坏衣服（取非，不会成功）
B. 消费者迫切需求（即使不积极寻求，只是可能减少销量，不会妨碍成功）
C. 成本不会太高（取非，只是削弱）
D. 竞争公司没有相似产品（取非，削弱）
E. 适用于广泛的衣服（适用性不广使销量下降）

B❌ A
P：鱼的供给大，价格低；供给少，价格高
C：暴风雨预报，导致供给少，价格低
选出假设，解释矛盾
A. 渔民预测到暴风雨，急于销售，导致过剩（供给大于需求，因此价格低。所以即使供给不多，但只要供过于求就行）

DI
BCBDBDCADB
结构清晰：第一段：简介GBA
第二段：有利于GBA发展的因素—XRL
第三段：挑战
第四段：有利因素和展望
根据结构定位做题

RC
EABBDBCD
一、引出主题：公司多元化的解释，目前最持久的解释是反垄断假说
二、支持反垄断假说的学者以及反对者
三、本文目的以及实例推翻反垄断假设
四、美国之外一些国家的证据也反对反垄断假说，结论：反垄断有影响但不是主要原因

作者: Rita糖糖 时间: 2024-4-6 07:20
CR
E, B

RC EABBDBCD

作者: jeilham 时间: 2024-4-6 16:14
00000000000000000000

作者: Bonet 时间: 2024-4-7 13:27
cr：c（a）a

作者: 时间哪 时间: 2024-4-8 09:38
RC：eabbdbcd
CR：bb

作者: fangjue987a 时间: 2024-4-14 14:19
Day 94

CR

1B （A）

2A

RC

1E
2A
3B
4B
5D
6B
7C
8D

DI

1b
2c
3b
4d
5b
6d
7C
8A
9D
10B

作者: 來不及 时间: 2024-4-14 23:50
[attach]271760[/attach][attach]271762[/attach]

作者: Blair1001 时间: 2024-4-27 14:14
第九十四天
cr
公司研究了一种新洗涤剂产品，能减少毛躁和掉色，这个产品会取得成功。假设题 b 注重市场需求，但是不如答案更加注重产品本身（答案a 产品本身有缺陷）
捕到的鱼多的时候价格低，鱼少的时候价格高。但是台风使得鱼少且价格低。解释题 a
di
b
c
b
d
b
d
c
a
d
b
RC
公司的分解主要是由于不信任。
政策原因。但是反对者认为其他政策不同的国家公司也分解。
如果这个政策能够解释，那么大公司会比小公司更容易分解。但事实并非如此。
而且，其他哦价格也有公司分解。因此一定另有原因。
主旨题 e
细节题 a
细节题 b
案例题 b
案例题 d
案例题 b
推理题 c
态度题 d
词汇
stance n 立场
horizontally adv 水平地
corroborate v 证实，支持

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)