ChaseDream

标题: 再问LSAT-7-4-19 [打印本页]
作者: catking2003    时间: 2005-10-27 21:58
标题: 再问LSAT-7-4-19

19. It takes 365.25 days for the Earth to make one complete revolution around the sun. Long ?standing convention makes a year 365 days long, with an extra day added every fourth year, and the year is divided into 52 seven-day weeks. But since 52 times 7 is only 364, anniversaries do not fall on the same day of the week each year. Many scheduling problems could be avoided if the last day of each year and an additional day every fourth year belonged to no week, so that January 1 would be a Sunday every year.

The proposal above, once put into effect, would be most likely to result in continued scheduling conflicts for which one of the following groups?

(A) people who have birthdays or other anniversaries on December 30 or 31

(B) employed people whose strict religious observances require that they refrain from working every seventh day

(C) school systems that require students to attend classes a specific number of days each year

(D) employed people who have three-day breaks from work when holidays are celebrated on Mondays or Fridays

(E) people who have to plan events several years before those events occur
有人解释说

19）E是个无关选项。只是说几年前做了计划在一个事件发生之前。首先固定时间应该排除。
B是说employed people 被限制在每隔7天做一件事情。假如从January 1 Sunday 开始，一年后应该是星期1（364+1）。但按照新的方法，又是Sunday，明显冲突（）。简单可以这样想。新的方法不是按7循环（7循环*52再做一个1天的调整），而B要求按7循环

但我认为，B只要求每7天休息一次，但这第七天是一个星期的那一天没有做要求，也就是说，我管他一年后是星期几，反正是七天休息一次就是了。


反倒是D选项有一个不可忽视的问题，因为新规定使每年的日期与星期一一对应了，那么，如果刚好节假日不是星期一五，工人就永远不能休假了，而在原来的制度下，总有机会使节假日是在星期一五（每年日期星期错开一位）

作者: applecider    时间: 2005-10-29 06:01

I didn't think that much when doing this question. The only thing happened to be on my mind was that...


The proposal will influence something that is required to do once every 7 days.


So I picked answer (B)

作者: catking2003    时间: 2005-10-29 18:57
我的发应是这个建议会影响星期与日期的关系呢
作者: applecider    时间: 2005-10-29 22:47

let me try to explain my ideas...I'd really wanna use Chinese if I could do it!! hope I can make my point in English loh~~


** (make-up) example **


My company has every employee every Sunday off. I am a Muslim, and my religious observance (which requires me stay at home all day every 7th day) fits well with the current schedule because I can always do observance on Sundays. And it doesn't bother my boss at all.


This means, no matter what date is it, as long as my 7th day is always a Sunday, my boss won't complain about anything.


However, right now my company adopts a new proposal that "the last day of each year and an additional day every fourth year belonged to no week."  It really brings a big trouble for me because my original schedule....(red: observance)




































Sun Mon Tue Wed ThuFri Sat
12/24 12/2512/26 12/27 12/28 12/29 12/30
12/31 1/1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6
1/7  1/8


becomes like........




















Sun Mon Tue Wed ThuFri Sat
12/24 12/2512/26 12/27 12/28 12/29

12/30


   12/31--> doesn't belong any week now












1/1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5  1/61/7


I think my boss gonna kill me if I often take two days off a week >.<


作者: catking2003    时间: 2005-10-30 16:42

好像挺有道理的


但是：


1。还是没说明为什么D不对


2。其实我也有想过是不是在星期天休息会比较好，但我随即否定了我的观点。因为worker不是student，没有双休日（从一般情况看，不知道老美是不是这样），那么星期天对他们应该没太大意义，所以为什么一定要星期天休息呢？


只要七天里向老板请一天假就可以了嘛。


applecider解释应该是基于company一个星期休假一天吧，不过文中并没给出此假设，如果ETS认为这是常识的话.......



这也太欺负我们发展中国家的考生了吧，中国还好，有些国家的大多数职员没有一星期休息一次的习惯吧（我揣摩）－而且中国的血汗工厂里的工人更是不可能休息呢，他们也是EMPLOYED的啊！！


有点扯远了，不好意思

作者: applecider    时间: 2005-10-30 23:05

heheh...that's interesting!! but i thought it's pretty normal to take a fixed day off for any company. There are 2 days off every week in the United States.


And about answer (D), I don't see any conflicts because they can still take 3 days off anyhow.

作者: catking2003    时间: 2005-10-31 19:39

D的话因为要在星期一五过节才放假，所以如果按1月1号是星期天，可能有些节日就永远也放不了假了...





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3