大全341(og-151). If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.（D）
(A)
(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating
(D)
(E) Should Dr. Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating
大全中解释如下:
D, the best choice, deals successfully with four issues. It uses a present indicative verb form in the conditional clause. If Dr. Wade is right, in order to agree with the verb in the main clause, any connection is...coincidental. It uses the idiomatic phrasing connection between x and y. It presents the coordinate objects of the preposition between (eating... and excelling...) in parallel form. Finally, the adjective apparent appears in front of its headnoun connection, not after. A, B, and E use incorrect verb forms in the conditional clause. A and B use the unidiomatic connection of x and y. A and C violate parallelism with eating of. C and E incorrectly place apparent after its headword connection.
B中的动词为什么不对呢?参照下面一题的正确答案A,不也是这种形式吗?
大全243(sec03-04). Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world’s largest multinational banks.（A）
(A) should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is
(B) should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, are
(C) should they repudiate a significant number of these debts, are
(D) if there is a repudiation of a significant number of these debts, would be
(E) if a significant number of these debts will be repudiated, is
关键在于前者是条件句:if a happens, b will happen,这是常考得用法.
而后者不是条件句.
前者og的解释说:A, B, and E use incorrect verb forms in the conditional clause 是不是其实就是在说,其实B也是条件句呢?
而且,后者(大全243)是什么呢?我在大全的解释中看到,这句也可以作为条件句来理解的对吗?
大全解释如下:
243, sec03-04
A) best.
B) are the solvency主谓不一致。
C) 同上。
D) there is a repudiation of a significant number of these debts意思表达不清楚。
E) if will错。
should a significant number of these debts be repudiated句型的解释：
这句型是个固定表达, used in conditional sentencnes about what is possible in the future, 一般认为是虚拟态。
1) Should you be interested (if you are…),I have a book on the subject you might like to see.
2) Should you need any help (=if you need any help), you can always phone me at the office. (LONGMAN)
3) Should one of a pair die, the remaining fish cannot swim off in search of a mate, nor is one likely to arrive.(大全RC)
4)Should the environment ever become too extreme to support human life, naturalists predict that mice would be able to adapt and survive.此句把从句中的条件句前置了。
5) LZM的例子：Should anyone call (=if anyone should call), please take a message.在此句型中（should...），主句可以不需要用虚拟条件下的动词形式。
说实话,二者区别是在老火,可以通过其他原因来排除..
惭愧~~~我还是不懂~~~再请NN们敲打敲打~~~
我看的OG11 verbal review上说, B项should be cannot be followed by a present-tense verb; E: should have been cannot be followed by a present-tense verb...那么, 如果我想要保持B项或者E项,后面未划线部分的动词究竟应该用什么时态才对?
楼主很细心啊。其实两种表达都是可以的。
在现在时的条件句中可以用两种方来表达：
1）if A happens, B will happen/happens.
2）should A happen, B will happen/happens.
最上面那道题B不是错在时态的选择上，而是connection的用法一般connection表示A与B关联的时候只用A is in connection with B或者connection between A and B.
用connection of的不多见，比如he is a connection of mine。意思是他是我的亲戚。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |