ChaseDream

标题: Accounting PhD 选择 [打印本页]

作者: Kelly8888 时间: 2023-2-19 18:01
标题: Accounting PhD 选择
UU们好，申请季收到UCLA和INSEAD两个offer，各有利弊，求帮忙建议！
做的是Financial Archival, 包括esg, fund, disclosure都很感兴趣～

作者: gshlucas 时间: 2023-2-19 18:29
研究实力两校都很好，感觉insead placement 更稳定一点，心中很多毕业生去了UBC。

作者: Tripleg 时间: 2023-2-19 21:31
INSEAD is at the level of HBS and Wharton and so ranks above UCLA to certain extent.

作者: raccoon_paw 时间: 2023-2-20 23:58

Tripleg 发表于 2023-2-19 21:31
INSEAD is at the level of HBS and Wharton and so ranks above UCLA to certain extent.

这个排法太绝对了，还是看专业，至少Finance和accounting，你去问INSEAD自己的教授，人家都不敢说我们比肩HBS和Wharton。

作者: d.jiao 时间: 2023-2-21 03:44

raccoon_paw 发表于 2023-2-20 23:58
这个排法太绝对了，还是看专业，至少Finance和accounting，你去问INSEAD自己的教授，人家都不敢说我们比 ...

同意！

作者: zzmypster 时间: 2023-2-21 03:54

raccoon_paw 发表于 2023-2-20 23:58
这个排法太绝对了，还是看专业，至少Finance和accounting，你去问INSEAD自己的教授，人家都不敢说我们比 ...

其实就算是hbs，也有些专业一般的。真正六边形的可能只有chicago/stanford。

作者: Tripleg 时间: 2023-2-21 06:53

raccoon_paw 发表于 2023-2-20 23:58
这个排法太绝对了，还是看专业，至少Finance和accounting，你去问INSEAD自己的教授，人家都不敢说我们比 ...

Okay. You are absolutely right. Mine is a macro view, though, and I think my claim that INSEAD is comparable to HBS, Wharton, and the like is not quite off the mark.

As is rightly pointed out below, even the concentrations of schools of the stature of HBS are not even in research strength, faculty reputation, and placements. But it is generally safe to say that the higher a program/school ranks, the lower the differential in quality among its different concentrations.

作者: raccoon_paw 时间: 2023-2-21 12:45

Tripleg 发表于 2023-2-21 06:53
Okay. You are absolutely right. Mine is a macro view, though, and I think my claim that INSEAD is c ...

Now it’s a fair claim. As LZ’s specific asking for accounting programs, it is better we have the suggestion based on accounting itself, not the general or macro view.

作者: likejulia 时间: 2023-2-21 13:32
同拿到insead offer，decision science的，求交流

作者: 只是无聊来灌水 时间: 2023-2-22 13:41
Congrats!! I would choose UCLA. No brainer。论senior faculty，他们有Siew Hong, Judson, Henry，这都是editor/ex editor，你还可以选择做theory or empirical。论placement，UCLA 也有place 到UCB, Kellogg的。

作者: Kelly8888 时间: 2023-2-22 23:12

只是无聊来灌水发表于 2023-2-22 13:41
Congrats!! I would choose UCLA. No brainer。论senior faculty，他们有Siew Hong, Judson, Henry，这都是 ...

Thx!

作者: raccoon_paw 时间: 2023-2-22 23:26

只是无聊来灌水发表于 2023-2-22 13:41
Congrats!! I would choose UCLA. No brainer。论senior faculty，他们有Siew Hong, Judson, Henry，这都是 ...

ACCT选校的角度我个人不认为No brainer选UCLA。UCLA近几年的place相较于本身的brand来说平平无奇，今年市场上的韩国老哥最后去了CUHKSZ，我没找到他的CV不太清楚老哥的自身水平有没有RR这些。在没有做deep research的情况下，我个人很难说这两个offer哪个更好。unfortunately，我并没有关于这两所学校的private information，建议你多和在读学生聊一下，也可以找一下这几年的JM google sheet看看。选校还是要自己多做功课。

作者: Tripleg 时间: 2023-2-23 11:07
I took a moment to peruse the UCLA and INSEAD Accounting faculty profiles, and this confirmed my earlier belief that the latter is as strong as the former. Also, at the aggregate level, INSEAD is one half tier above UCLA. Therefore, I am inclined to buy Raccoon Paw's second thoughts above.

作者: 只是无聊来灌水 时间: 2023-2-24 09:29

Kelly8888 发表于 2023-2-22 23:12
Thx!

前两年market很糟糕，而且UCLA PhD program中间停了很多年，maybe that's why we can't think of any of their recent gradautes。Insead最近10年的最强的应该是SMU的S Huang，but he's from Finance if i remember it correctly。

Anyway，既然 LZ能拿到2个这么好的offer，应该已经对accounting research有不错的概念了。祝一切顺利

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)