[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3 - ChaseDream

作者: 盐盐小羊 时间: 2022-9-22 10:18
dd

作者: 13454641543 时间: 2022-9-22 10:19
1

作者: 鸡麦特焖焖 时间: 2022-9-22 10:19
1

作者: 言言不吃盐 时间: 2022-9-22 10:25
同意！

作者: 言言不吃盐 时间: 2022-9-22 10:36
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
类比推理
P：水泥比木头房子更省钱，许多实验证实了
C：现实生活比实验省的更多
找出现实生活和实验不同的地方--现实生活cooling/heating变化大，水泥散热慢，保持温度减少空调等电器的使用
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
方案措施题
P：推出信用卡，信用卡可以让食堂员工辨认出学生
C：可以防贼
CQ：方案不可行--信用卡可以换成钱且不需要本人操作
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

作者: 言言不吃盐 时间: 2022-9-22 10:38
1

作者: dyf冲！！！ 时间: 2022-9-22 10:39
看一下！

作者: Ak777 时间: 2022-9-22 10:41
看一下！

作者: lau9999 时间: 2022-9-22 10:42
看一下！

作者: 鸡麦特焖焖 时间: 2022-9-22 10:44

day3
1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：实验中，cement houses 在c/h方面可以generate more cost savings 比起wood的
C：现实生活中，cement houses generate得比实验中更多

思路：范围差
加强：现实中在除了c/h之外有更多generate cost savings的方面。

2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

方案：使用有学生签名和头像的信用卡来代替现金

目的：减少贼

will not work：1.员工脸盲

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

环境学家：ban俩东西可以促进旅游业
two states的情况：ban俩东西旅游业更垮了

why：什么东西在two states会让ban之后旅游业更垮
A无关
B 中间因素

作者: lau9999 时间: 2022-9-22 10:49
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
- real life中和实验的区别，关于cost savings

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
--没有规定员工一定要比对脸，所以员工减少工作量就只用让学生刷卡

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

作者: Sophie_Lee 时间: 2022-9-22 10:51
看一下！

作者: charming- 时间: 2022-9-22 10:52
Mark一下！

作者: DonkeyG 时间: 2022-9-22 10:53

Day3

1. 水泥木头房子
The question saidthat there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more costsavings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conductedexperiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in reallife compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

可能有很多方向，比如科学证明水泥对于隔热要比木头强。

2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

有很多可能：

a. 家长不喜欢用信用卡，因为要还钱，学生每天的现金数量有限好控制，但信用卡无法控制

b. 食堂员工无法完全核实签名和头像

c. 一旦被偷走，会损失比先进多的财产

d. 贼的数量和是否用现金或者其他支付手段无关

3. 广告牌
Environmentalistsay that 比较（不友好）的billboardsand commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government shouldban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whosegovernment banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explainwhy?
A: Did not considereffects from other signs
B: Did not considerfactors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

a. 之前比较不友好的sign可能本身就是吸引人的一个亮点，别人觉得好玩才来

b. 这些sign虽然不友好，但是能提供很多价值，ban了之后其他人就不愿意来了

作者: Ak777 时间: 2022-9-22 11:02
1.水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

-实验环境对水泥房子的表现不利
-实验中，能影响cost saving的因素不能像现实中那样全部仿真，使得水泥在现实表现大于实验表现

2.办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

-打饭阿姨追求效率，接过来卡直接刷，根本不看卡面
-即使辨认出来，也可以说是帮舍友打饭，没法证实
-信用卡可取现，那么贼依然愿意偷

3.广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

-A 如果原题是，存在比较（不友好）与比较（友好）的两种signs，结果政府ban掉了两种在内的全部signs，那A Did not consider effects from other signs (比较友好的signs) 可能对，比较友好的积极影响大于不友好的消极影响
-B 样本一多或许能找到几个与原假设相悖的例子，可能并不是假设的逻辑错误，而是无法控制全部因素，使得他因发挥作用

作者: charming- 时间: 2022-9-22 11:06
1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

类比，找实验室和生活除了cooling和heating能节省的费用
生活中水泥房子比木房子更结实，省了修理费

2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

食堂员工不能辨认出所有学生
丢卡比丢现金损失更大

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs扩大范围了
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B对的

作者: cpan 时间: 2022-9-22 11:09
看一下！

作者: Sophie_Lee 时间: 2022-9-22 11:14
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
加强方向：现实社会使用水泥房子确实更省钱。答案方向：强调实验和现实生活有哪点不一样，实验忽视了哪点，而现实生活中因为有这点导致实际上水泥房子在制冷和制热上更省钱。

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
由于食堂人多，食堂员工经常不仔细/没时间核对学生的签名和头像。

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?       B
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

作者: 盐盐小羊 时间: 2022-9-22 11:28
1. experiment相比real life限制了水泥优势的发挥

2.贼不是本校学生？
食堂阿姨因为人太多根本不核对人脸姓名，否则效率过于低下

3.
B：非相关因果？
+猎奇心态，越不咋地的广告牌反而更吸引人（比如椰树椰

作者: Shell_liang 时间: 2022-9-22 11:31
看一下！

作者: 一只小白 时间: 2022-9-22 11:46
顶

作者: Shell_liang 时间: 2022-9-22 11:58
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

水泥房子-cost saving多
cooling/heating因素在现实中会更加剧

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

信用卡有学生信息-贼实用就能辨认
前提是贼要用，但是很多贼可以不用这个卡，比如借别人的用

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

sign减少旅游业收入-ban-旅游收入仍然减少
sign有一些其他的功能，促进旅游业的增长的

作者: 一只小白 时间: 2022-9-22 12:01

1.实验环境与真实环境一样。除了以上两个成本外，其他成本也比较低

2.贼可以易容。食堂阿姨脸盲或者看的不够仔细辨认不出来。照片不清晰没法辨认。
3.b

作者: Pc700 时间: 2022-9-22 12:49
同意！

作者: dyf冲！！！ 时间: 2022-9-22 12:50
7. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

p1：相比木房子，水泥房子能在cooling/heating方面省下更多的钱
p2: 实验证明了这一点
c：相比于实验的证明，现实生活中能省下来更多
思路：水泥房子在现实生活中有一些方面比木头房子更便宜——点明现实生活和实验的不同点

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

p：之前现金买房，有贼，换成了信用卡，有签名和头像来减少贼
目的：减少这贼
c：措施没起效果
猜测原因：贼偷信用卡，签名和头像没防住，可能是食堂的员工不会核对人和卡
猜测原因2: 食堂没有强制使用信用卡，还是有贼用现金刷

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

p：不友好的公告牌和商业标识——抑制旅游业
奇怪现象：某2个州禁止了这些公告牌和广告标识，结果旅游业发展减缓了，为啥？
推测：他因干扰，选b

作者: Chuu_Ack 时间: 2022-9-22 13:09
看一下！

作者: Chuu_Ack 时间: 2022-9-22 13:19
922
1、
P1:水泥房子比木头房子在制热制冷方面更省钱
P2:实验证明
C:现实生活比实验省的更多
GAP:比较现实生活和实验的条件差异
猜测：雨水等自然条件使得水泥的比热更大了？

2、
P1:学生之前用现金买饭
P2:信用卡有学生签名头像，员工可以辨认学生
C:不会奏效
GAP:员工是否关心签名头像？
猜测：员工很忙，压根不看信用卡上的头像

3、
P1:不友好的广告会减少游客的增加，政府应该禁止
但是：两个禁止了不友好广告的州游客数量仍然减少了
GAP:他因？
猜测：这两个州在禁止广告的同时出台了政策，使得旅游成本变高

作者: 邦德王 时间: 2022-9-22 14:47

1. 水泥木头房子

The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

加强（cement-cost）：1. 现实中有更多实验中没考虑到但会增加cost的问题。2. 实际环境比实验室更恶劣结果比实验室更严重、更多cost。

2. 办信用卡防贼

学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

削弱（信用卡-减少贼）：1. 贼有其他方式利用信用卡来犯罪；2. 食堂员工不会仔细辨认，贼还是有可趁之机；3. 信用卡的坏处：体积小更容易偷走。

3. 广告牌

Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?

A: Did not consider effects from other signs

B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

削弱（ban-increase）1. 其他原因影响reduction，选项B 2. 本身有很多tourism被ban掉的sign吸引

作者: wannatechan 时间: 2022-9-22 15:24
Mark一下！

作者: 问题不大35 时间: 2022-9-22 15:26
看一下！

作者: 问题不大35 时间: 2022-9-22 15:40
1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：实验表明水泥房子比木房子在加热和降温方面更省钱
C：真实情况下省的更多

预测答案：真实情况和实验室的差别。可能温度、湿度等因素不一样。

2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

方案：推出有学生签名和头像的信用卡来买饭
目的：防贼

预测答案（削弱）：员工不一定能辨认/辨认工作量大，直接刷卡

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

B

作者: wannatechan 时间: 2022-9-22 15:45
1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
前提：实验证明：Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses.
结论：cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment
猜测方向：现实生活中，有什么因素会导致Cement houses更加generate cost savings in terms of cooling/heating，或者现实生活中，有什么因素会导致wood houses更不generate cost savings in terms of cooling/heating

2 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
方案式推理
方式：推出信用卡，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来
目的：防贼
猜测方向：直接怼为什么不可行，比如打饭的时候员工根本不看头像等等

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
第一件事：不友好的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism.
与第二件事：ban the sign---tourism growth下降冲突
猜测方向：有除了billboards and commercial signs其他因素的影响

作者: chasesky 时间: 2022-9-22 16:19
1

作者: shirleyliu_46 时间: 2022-9-22 16:41
看一下！

作者: shirleyliu_46 时间: 2022-9-22 16:44
1. 试验条件和显示情况有某种不同
2. 食堂员工没有时间核对信用卡；头像分辨率低，难以辨认；小偷会偷和自己头像很像的人的卡……
3. B；没有考虑其他影响旅游增长的因素

作者: Holly与六便士 时间: 2022-9-22 18:20
Mark一下！

作者: anduyin 时间: 2022-9-22 19:53
看一下！

作者: anduyin 时间: 2022-9-22 20:00
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：水泥的cost saving 比 wood 更多
C：节省成本在实际会比实验的更多
加强方向：找出水泥和wood为啥会在实际中导致区分更大
猜测：实际太阳直射会导致wood散热和制冷更慢，而cement不受影响

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
GOAl：为了防贼
P：信用卡有学生的前面和头像，可以辨认学生
C：无法减少贼

猜测：贼也可以自己在信用卡上贴自己的照片和头像

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

P：不好的billboards 和signs 会减少旅游业的增加
异常：两个州这样干了旅游业下降了

答案：忽略了其他可能会影响旅游业的因素，比如当时刚好疫情。

作者: zzz1. 时间: 2022-9-22 20:34
看一下！

作者: 佛系A子在線讀書 时间: 2022-9-22 20:42
看一下！

作者: zzz1. 时间: 2022-9-22 20:44
1.水泥木头房子
P：Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses— experiment confirmed
C：cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment
Strengthen：1）实验情况和真实情况不一样

2.办信用卡防贼
P：信用卡有学生名字和照片，食堂员工可以分辨学生
C：减少贼
Not work：1）在实际操作中，食堂员工不会关注个人信息
2）信用卡记录的学生头像很难分辨

3.广告牌
P：环境学家说不友好的广告牌会降低旅游业的增长
C：政务应该禁止那些广告牌
有反例，两个地方的政府禁止了广告牌，他们游客增长也变少了
Why：1）有其他导致游客增长减少的原因

作者: 白白有点黑 时间: 2022-9-22 20:44
同意！

作者: 白白有点黑 时间: 2022-9-22 20:59
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
——p：两种房子，实验说水泥房子比木头房子省钱
——c：现实生活中花费应该会更少
——加强：实验和现实生活的条件存在不同
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
——p：饭卡有学生签名和头像+食堂员工可以辨认学生
——c：贼会变少
——为什么没用：信用卡可以用在其他地方？员工是否能成功辨认
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
——p：不友好公告牌会减少旅游增长
——c：禁止这类公告牌后旅游增长减少
——为什么：他因造成旅游减少/这个环境学家说的东西证据不足（b）

作者: 去很多地方 时间: 2022-9-22 21:05
看一下！

作者: 去很多地方 时间: 2022-9-22 21:14
1.加强：实验设置的温度更极端、real life的其他成本更低
2.削弱：员工记不住那么多学生
3.广告牌会减少旅游业增长，但减少广告牌后旅游业也下降了
B
预测：他因，正好是旅游淡季；副作用，广告牌的作用是宣传旅游

作者: 花花嘛嘛 时间: 2022-9-22 21:18
1

作者: 佛系A子在線讀書 时间: 2022-9-22 21:40
1.水泥房子比木頭房子省錢，而且現實中會比實驗中省更多，問加強
(1)水泥房子還有恆溫之外的優點(更堅固之類的)

2.信用卡有簽名跟頭像，但還是不防賊，why?
(1)食堂員工根本沒有費心去每個人核對身分
(2)賊偷卡之後可以用不用辨認卡片持有人身分的方式換到錢

3.環境學家說劣質標牌會減少觀光，但政府禁止劣質標牌後有兩個州觀光下跌，why?
(1)劣質標牌跟觀光之間沒有關聯
(2)標牌被禁之後反而造成其他的因素會影響觀光

作者: 700720 时间: 2022-9-22 21:52
看一下！

作者: 700啊700 时间: 2022-9-22 22:18
康康！

作者: George_chen 时间: 2022-9-22 23:27
看一下！

作者: George_chen 时间: 2022-9-22 23:41
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
P：实验证实水泥房子比木头房子更节约使用成本（在cooling和heating方面）
C：现实中会比实验中更节省
现实中的极端天气会比实验环境更糟糕；现实中还有很多实验条件下没考虑到的因素

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
信用卡有学生头像，食堂员工可以辨认
因此用信用卡代替现金买饭可以防止偷窃
买饭很忙，员工无暇顾及信用卡头像；学生钱被盗更多发生在寝室

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

作者: DylanStrawberry 时间: 2022-9-22 23:46
看一下！

作者: DylanStrawberry 时间: 2022-9-23 00:18
1.strengthen：real life中随着时间推移，木头房子很容易产生建筑材料老化、漏气，以及容易燃烧等问题，当heating/cooling systems鼓掌的时候容易引起火灾增加成本；
2.贼可以伪造或者偷窃别人的信用卡假扮学生
3.b

作者: 筱雅Jane510 时间: 2022-9-23 01:47
看一下！

作者: 筱雅Jane510 时间: 2022-9-23 02:32
Day 3

1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
P: C has more cost savings than W (cooling/heating)
C: More cost savings in real life
Strenthen: Found data or examples of other cost savings. e.g. C can last for much longer time than W. W will cost a lot on cleaning.

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
P: Workers can recognize the student by using a credit card with the student's signiture and photo on it.
C: Using that kind of card can achive the goal of decreasing thiefs.
Goal cannot achive:  Because the workers generally doesnot check the card that carefully. And thiefs steal not only cash but also credit cards.

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

P: Gov. should ban the signs and billboards which will reduce the tourism growth.
C: V and M banned the sign, but tourism decreased.
Reason: Other reason caused the reduction, such as the price increasing, the climate changed, another new and better place opend.

作者: 芝麻芋圆 时间: 2022-9-23 17:16
Mark一下！

作者: NUS等我 时间: 2022-9-23 20:30
同意！

作者: PennyWen95 时间: 2022-9-23 20:33
看一下！

作者: PennyWen95 时间: 2022-9-23 20:36
Day 2
1.       柿子
考古学家在一个英国殖民地的一口枯井里发现了樱桃蓝莓和柿子的种子，而柿子（persimmon）不是这个英国的本土植物，但本地人好像喜欢吃柿子，因为发现柿子都是被留到快坏了才吃的，结论说土著教殖民者（英国人）吃本地不太熟悉的食物。问削弱
因为柿子都是被留到快坏了才吃，所以喜欢吃柿子。也许不是因为喜欢/不熟悉才留到最后吃，是因为它因。井里也有发现一种不可食的植物的种子

2.       假钞逻辑漏洞题
其一（find the flaw）：政府为了打击假钞，准备发行新的纸币。然后新的纸币发行了之后，在市面上还是发现了新钞票的假钞。又过了几个月，政府宣布新纸币的发行成功让假钞团伙放弃了印假钞。问这个argument的错误在哪儿。
政府宣布新纸币的发行成功让假钞团伙放弃了印假钞—但是明明在市面上还是发现了新钞票的假钞
其二（assumption）：假钞但是是说旧货币造假严重，有了一个新科技来抑制。又说新的货币发行后，好像是先有很多假币，后几年就没再发现假币了。所以推论这个新科技有作用。问有什么assumption。
新货币发行后，市面上发现的所有假钞都是旧货币，新货币从未发现造假。
3.       手套
描述一：是一种soon还是loon什么的专家认为会导致心血管疾病。因为他们做了个实验在一这个物质高的城市验证了这个说然后给了好多选项，问那个会 undermine这个
它因削弱，因为这个物质高的城市，另一种物质的含量高或者低
描述二：in places where there is a lot of pollution, people get cardiovascular diseases. And then they did an experiment, in which places with high pollution had higher rates and places with low pollution had smaller rates.  Therefore, places with higher pollution are more likely to get the disease. （undermine）
It is not due to the high-rate pollution, but other factors caused the higher rate of disease. / There are more sick ppl (already have diseases) who live in the high-rate pollution environment.

作者: PennyWen95 时间: 2022-9-23 21:13
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. The argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
Maybe is due to the environment in real life/other factors, some effects(fungus/animals) will cause more troubles to wood house. 相比木头房，水泥房在制冷/取暖方面更省钱, 相关环节的费用未予考虑, 木头贵

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
学生化妆，换发型，或者穿一些衣服，食堂员工就无法识别他们。一些长相相似的人，也可以偷信用卡来用。该信用卡在其他地方也能用。

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

它因，the billboards and commercial signs which are not friendly may cause the decrease of the tourism. But other factors may also affect the tourism, like off-season/weather/revamp

作者: Muqierrrrr 时间: 2022-9-23 23:21

1. 水泥木头房子
实验证明水泥房子省钱

现实生活发现水泥房子比实验结果现实的更省钱

猜测答案：实验没有考虑到的一些能够让水泥房子更省钱的方式

猜测答案：如果遇到不是本人的信用卡学生解释为借的同学的员工没有途径去查证
3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

作者: 牧鸢年华 时间: 2022-9-23 23:44
看一下！

作者: 光中雾 时间: 2022-9-24 11:42
感谢

作者: hs999 时间: 2022-9-25 22:02
Mark一下！

作者: hs999 时间: 2022-9-25 22:17
Day 3 打卡
1、水泥木头房子找实验条件和现实条件的差别，如：
现实比实验条件更热/冷，所以两种房子的冷却/加热费用差别更大实验采用的水泥质量没有现实中的质量好，所以现实中水泥房子的保温隔热效果更好
2、办信用卡防贼
方案有副作用：偷卡比偷现金更容易
方案无法实施：食堂员工太忙，无法逐个辨别
3、广告牌
不友好的广告牌-抑制游客；撤除所有广告牌-抑制游客
A 考虑到其他种类的广告牌可能促进游客数量

作者: Ryyoo 时间: 2022-9-26 13:35
同意！

作者: 儂子 时间: 2022-9-26 15:23
看一下！

作者: 小雪要上学 时间: 2022-9-26 15:51
同意！

作者: 儂子 时间: 2022-9-26 15:55
Day 3

作者: 金小鹿 时间: 2022-9-26 16:04
You,a

作者: 曼特宁1213 时间: 2022-9-26 19:08
看一下

作者: 曼特宁1213 时间: 2022-9-26 19:18
1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
———————-
1⃣️木头造房子会有其他成本-木材损耗、运输成本、木材价格上涨等
2⃣️水泥成本可能更低-新技术导致价格下调、运输更方便高效

2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
——————-
1⃣️信用卡不方便用，所以学生用的很少，无法起效果
2⃣️信用卡上签名和头像容易更改造假
3⃣️员工不会一个个去辨认
4⃣️头像不一样可以说用同学的卡之类的

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
———————————
B

作者: Mertian 时间: 2022-9-28 15:56
Mark一下！

作者: Tiffnini 时间: 2022-9-29 13:27
Mark一下！

作者: Tiffnini 时间: 2022-9-29 15:19
1.       水泥木头房子
加强方向：real life中，除了冷热，还有很多方面能节省cost（比如人工，原材料，建造成本等等）

2.       办信用卡防贼
矛盾点：卡容易丢失或者伪造

3.       广告牌
这个sign在不同的州会产生不同的效果
禁止了sign之后产生了一系列相关的影响，最终导致旅游减少

作者: 黑框旻 时间: 2022-9-30 14:51
看一下！

作者: 黑框旻 时间: 2022-9-30 16:16
1. 现实生活中的环境更为恶劣，至少比实验室更恶劣，在温度控制上要求更高，话费也更高；

2. 会增加其他的不方便，导致员工的工作效率大大减低；

3. A：Ban会导致部分人认为言论不自由，好感降低拒绝前往
B：同期发生了其他事有损旅游业发展

作者: xkxkxkk 时间: 2022-9-30 21:57
Mark一下！

作者: xkxkxkk 时间: 2022-9-30 22:04
day3
1. 水泥房子不用经常修缮，所以省钱（但这题的P和C没有很懂）
2. 方案评估
goal：防贼
措施：签名头像、可以辨认
weaken：员工根本不会看签名和头像
3. P 应减少不好的广告，不然会降低旅游业的流量
C V & M 确定减少了，但是旅游业还是下降了
why？
减少广告牌会带来其他不好的影响，从而导致tourism reduction

作者: ElodieZHU 时间: 2022-10-1 12:15
看一下！

作者: ElodieZHU 时间: 2022-10-1 12:27
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
P：实验表明水泥散热比木头房子省钱
C：现实中，比实验条件下，省下的更多
GAP: 现实和实验室环境的差异
加强：现实中环境温度变化更大，更放大了水泥保温的省钱作用。
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
P：现金支付改为信用卡支付，食堂人员可以通过看信用卡辨别是不是学生
C：这个方法没减少贼
GAP：信用卡的实际使用情况
猜测：信用卡不是强制每个人使用的/信用卡上的信息食堂人员不认真看
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

P：环境学家认为攀比的广告牌会减少旅游业，所以政府应该禁止
怪现象：有两个州，禁止了这些广告牌后旅游业增长却减少了
GAP：他因/环境学家建议在这两个州不适用
猜测：禁止广告牌政策的同时有其他政策影响了旅游业/这两个地方的广告牌一直是在民调中吸引旅游业的原因

作者: 考研必过 时间: 2022-10-1 23:39
看一下

作者: 芝麻芋圆 时间: 2022-10-3 16:22
1. 真实环境中的气温相比实验室环境差异更大
2.（方案效果不好）信用卡上的学生头像与学生本人可能有差异，员工不一定能分辨差别；饭点食堂人流量大，员工可能不会费心去每个人都查看信用卡
3. B

作者: Carolineccc 时间: 2022-10-5 20:35
Mark一下！

作者: Carolineccc 时间: 2022-10-5 20:46
1. P: 水泥房子在保冷保暖方面比木头房子更省钱，许多实验证明了
      C: 在生活中比实验里更省钱
      Strengthen:-现实中水泥性能更好，省空调的钱了

2. P: 学校推出信用卡买饭，信用卡上有学生的头像和签名
      C: 食堂员工可以认出来以防贼
      Weaken: - 员工不会仔细检查信用卡

3. P: 环境专家说不好的billboards 和商业标语会减少游客量
      C: 有两个地方禁了这些以后游客量下降了
      Reason:
- 一些标语反而能招揽游客
- 有其他导致游客减少的原因

作者: OuyangYang 时间: 2022-10-25 14:52
1. 水泥木头房子
P：实验证明水泥房子比木房子更可能在cooling和heating方面节约钱
C：现实生活中节约的比实验中多
找加强：
找现实生活中与实验中不一样且帮助省钱的点

2. 办信用卡防贼
P：信用卡有学生签名和头像，使得食堂员工可以辨别学生，减少偷卡。
C：这种方式没用
找原因
食堂员工没用时间看

3. 广告牌
P：政府应该禁止不友好的billboards and commercial signs，因为他们 reduce the increase of tourism
C：政府禁止了这些signs，旅游增长下降
找原因：
选B，这些signs既有好的影响的一面也有坏的一面，好的一面大于坏的一面

作者: yumna 时间: 2022-10-26 10:52
1. 水泥木头房子：除了cooling/heating，水泥房子还有其他方面是比木头房子更省钱的。
2. 办信用卡防贼：削弱 1）方案无法实行：例如食堂员工无法根据头像签名辨认学生-照片差距过大，或者是员工没时间精力核对。 2）方案无法达成目标：例如贼可以修改学生头像等
3. 广告牌：those广告牌对旅游起到的促进作用也被消除掉了

作者: sofia索菲亚 时间: 2022-10-28 22:46
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.可能正确的选项：在实验中所提供的室内和室外温度的差别和现实生活中的室内室外温度差相比更加小，which means 在实验中cooling/heating不需要运转太多去保持温度的恒定。

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
逻辑：这个措施没用--》信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，不能让食堂里员工辨认出学生来（不能有效）；或者即使差别出差别，也不会指出，学生也不会因为盗窃受到惩罚。
可能正确的选项：

不能让食堂里员工辨认出学生来（不能有效）：这种信用卡的照片和签名很容易修改，食堂员工一般无法看出差别。
或者即使差别出差别，也不会指出：食堂员工即便发现有一些不一样，也会默认是学生的样貌变化，而不会过度干涉。

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
b吧

作者: ZZhiyan 时间: 2022-10-29 00:42
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
P：实验水泥房比木头房子更在散热和保温方面比木的省钱
C：现实中的水泥房子比实验更省钱
答案：除了散热和保温，水泥房子还有其他省钱优势

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
P：为了防贼，食堂推出学生专属饭卡，员工可以认出来卡是谁的
C：这个卡不比现金防贼
答案：员工没空核对信用卡的信息导致卡被乱刷盗刷，还是不能实现防贼的目的

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
P：环保人士认为，不友好的广告牌和商业标识会减少游客量，应该ban了这些广告牌
C：俩ban了广告牌的州的游客还是减少了
答案：他因B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

作者: Sharonnnhai 时间: 2022-10-29 16:35
1. 类比推理加强： real life 中有其他与实验不一样的因素，影响cost savings
2. 因果推理，因为：信用卡会有学生的签名和头像果：所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。削弱： 1）学生容貌发生改变，与信用卡上的头像不一样。2）刷卡时，食堂员工看不到学生。
3. 因：不好的sign will reduce the increase of tourism. 果 V M地ban 了之后能能加 tourism 削弱： B

作者: xxxx44 时间: 2022-10-30 16:09
1. 现实生活中木头房子条件比实验用的条件恶劣，气密性更差，
2. 食堂员工不核验身份，信用卡也可以在校外用，头像签名可以造假手段修改，盗卡人合理理由但没有规定专人专卡
3. 友好的广告牌又不是决定旅游增长的而唯一决定因素，有其他影响，比如其他广告牌的影响，季节经济社会新闻etc，甚至不友好的广告牌激发大众逆反心理也未可知

作者: CCCandice 时间: 2022-10-31 20:55
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
在实际生活中，温度变化差异更大，水泥房子省更多钱
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
学生往往会在信用卡的外面带上包装，平时看不到头像
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why? 没有考虑到ban带来的更不好的结果，ban带来的负面效果比billboard自身的负面效果更大。
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

作者: SarangZ 时间: 2022-11-1 11:27
1. 水泥木头房子
P：Cement --more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating --wood houses.
Conducted experiment and confirmed.
C：cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment.
strengthen---实验和生活不同之处，eg制造热等需要cost
2. 办信用卡防贼
BG:学生之前用现金买饭
P:学校推出信用卡来防贼(有学生的签名和头像)&食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来
C:减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
--辨认不出学生/根本不看照片签名/仍然有用现金
3. 广告牌
p: 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. government should ban those billboards and signs.
C:But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

作者: ANITAymlau 时间: 2022-11-1 18:44
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
现实中环境温度变化更大，更放大了水泥保温的省钱作用
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

食堂员工没用时间看
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth -->影响旅游增长的因素很多

作者: Yangxinxin1219 时间: 2022-11-1 20:31
打卡

作者: Zach760！ 时间: 2022-11-1 23:53
day3:
水泥木头房子
p: 实验证明cement houses相比于wood houses在AC制冷/加热上cost更低； C: cost saving在现实中可能更多；
加强题：因为conclusion是强调了会更多，所以推测答案会提出别的没有提到的cost saving的因素，总之是强调p和c关系的相关性

办信用卡防贼
P1: 学生过去用现金； P2: 推出带有学生头像和签名的信用卡
c: 盗窃会变少
削弱题：推测结果为他因选项；或者同因反果（其他学校也这么干，但是效果不佳）

广告牌
P1: 不友好广告牌会减少游客；
P2: 两个省份ban了这类sign却依然还是出现了游客量减少
解释题：他因归因

作者: Yangxinxin1219 时间: 2022-11-2 12:57
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
可能答案：现实中水泥房子还需要很高的运输费用
2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
可能答案：信用卡的头像很模糊或者阿姨根本不会仔细看
3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

作者: Dlunlun 时间: 2022-11-3 09:56
1. 水泥木头房子：水泥有在cooling/heating方面省钱的优势，结论是真实情况下水泥更省钱。要加强的话，我们可以说明水泥不仅在cooling/heating上省钱，还在其他方面省钱，比如运输费

2. 办信用卡防贼：遇到学生用不是本人信用卡的情况，食堂的员工也无法查证

3. B

作者: petittomato 时间: 2022-11-5 18:54
Day 3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
①experiment和real life有什么不同，比如real life的极端天气更多之类
②参加experiment的cement和wood和real life里的不太一样？比如real life里的质量会更好一点

2.       办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
①贼一般在食堂很忙的时候出现，这时候员工也很忙，没时间辨认学生

3.       广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
A

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)