Astronomer: observations of the shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter show that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragment’s size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere. These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments’ entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer spaces if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.
A. The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.
B. The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
C. The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.
D. The first provides evidences in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
应该选D,The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur,提供了作者判断碎块大小的一个客观事实，it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.是作者的结论。
欢迎指教
答案给的是E, 我对第一句想不通
我觉得答案是D。
The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur
说的是事实。
ding
D 和E之间的争议是：D是否是evidence。支持D，NN请指教！
The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur
Is it an evidence or a judgement?
An evidence: Specific facts offered to support a theory or premise
A judgement: An opinion drawn from a consideration of facts or evidence
Now consider another situation in which your friend and you are inside a room without windows. Your friend asked you, "is it rainning outside?".
If you've already been to outside, you would answer "yes it is rainning." ---- this states a fact based on direct evidence (you saw the rain).
If you haven't been outside but you read the forecast or hear the thunders, you would answer " yes it most certainly is rainning" -- this states a judgement based on your knowledge of indirect evidences. It COULD be wrong in some extreme cases.
Bottomline, you don't say " almost certainly" if it's an evidence, only when it's a judgement. (E)
可以问一下吗 BF是指什么题 BOLDFACE???是什么意思的 ??没碰过啊
The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but
many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer spaces if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.
晕倒….我怎么觉得B选…..正确答案确定是E吗??????
请楼主说说B为何错??
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |