ChaseDream

标题: 请问FEIFEI LOGIC-99 [打印本页]

作者: sawaii 时间: 2005-10-23 21:11
标题: 请问FEIFEI LOGIC-99

请问FEIFEI LOGIC-99，详解版也没看懂，ft!

99. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.

Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.

In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

(A) accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case

(B) discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence

(D) disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion

(E) attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

答案选C,请哪位大侠帮我解释一下为什么不能选D好吗？

十分感谢！

作者: lukrenee 时间: 2005-10-24 00:44

C说F是伟大的作家因为她作了事情X，A说F不是伟大的作家因为作家是不是伟大要看他是不是做了Y而不是看他做乐X，此外，事情X在F的时候很多人都做过乐。

选项C说：A不同意C的评判伟大作家的标准并对此作乐详细说明，是正解；

A,B,E都很容易排除，D错是因为D说disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion ，事实上A并没有presents facts去支持另一个评判标准，而是直接定义乐一个评判标准~~

作者: openmind 时间: 2005-10-25 21:17

Hi, lukrenee,

請教一下,這題要不要看順序呀?因為我覺得(C)順序好像顛倒了,我覺得A是先refute C的claim再reject C的criterion

Thanks...^_^

作者: steveyangxt 时间: 2005-12-27 08:45
The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day. 前一句是削弱判断标准，后一句是削弱一个论据。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)