ChaseDream

标题: 揽瓜阁 逻辑做题小分队Day135 [打印本页]

作者: 小白斩鸡    时间: 2021-10-20 19:36
标题: 揽瓜阁 逻辑做题小分队Day135
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat
[attach]262698[/attach]
Editorial: It is absurd to suppose that getting motorists to switch to electrically-powered automobiles will significantly reduce carbon emissions. Batteries have to be charged, and the electricity to charge them is almost certainly going to be produced by the burning of fossil fuels, A process that inevitably Creates carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide as by-products.
Which of the following would, if true, be most effective rebuttal of the editorial’s criticism?
A The smaller the number of locations at which carbon emissions occur, the easier it is to have carbon captured and sequester carbon emissions produced by the process.
B Most people insist that they would be willing to pay more for electrically-powered vehicles if they believed that widespread use of such vehicles would protect the environment.
C Carbon emissions produced in the manufacture of petroleum by-products constitute nearly one-half of all greenhouse gases produced by human industrial activity.
D Studies have shown that the less pollution people believe automobiles to produce, the longer distances they will tend to drive them.
E Although carbon emissions are most plentiful greenhouse gases, other such gases are more harmful per unit of weight.


After recent hurricanes produced tremendous damage there, Mardin County revised its building code. In doing so, Mardin imposed stricter standards for roofing but not for windows. The revision will undoubtedly reduce the principal cause of property damage, namely rainwater coming through damaged roofs. However, the revision will do little to prevent personal injuries, since, while many injuries are caused by flying debris breaking through windows, very few are caused by roof collapse or rainwater.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weaken the argument?
(A) For many years Mardin County's building code has imposed a stricter standard for windows than that imposed by most counties that are frequently struck by hurricanes.
(B) The hurricanes that recently hit Mardin County were not as severe as some hurricanes that have hit there in the past 100 years.
(C) Much of the flying debris carried by the winds of a hurricane is roof material that has become dislodged.
(D) During a hurricane, broken windows in a house cause increased pressure inside the house that can, in turn, cause the roof of the house to become damaged.
(E) Mardin County's building code applies to the repair of houses in addition to the construction of new houses.


参考答案:[hide=d30]AC[/hide]


作者: NCse    时间: 2021-10-20 23:05
ad

作者: yjjy3712    时间: 2021-10-21 00:34
ac
作者: 修夏zyx    时间: 2021-10-21 12:48
111
作者: _Salaxy_    时间: 2021-10-21 16:09
AC
作者: 断了的弦    时间: 2021-10-21 23:40
aa
作者: jennyqu_jy    时间: 2021-10-22 03:52
Mark一下!               
作者: zyycn    时间: 2021-10-22 09:58
1、因为给电动汽车的电池充电也是通过燃烧化石能源、会造成碳排放,所以让司机使用电动汽车来减少碳排放的做法是荒谬的。问weaken
思考:因果论证,考虑他因削弱。

A:碳排放的地点越少,越容易将碳捕捉。正确,电动汽车开车时并不会产生碳,而传统汽车开车时也会产生碳,发电过程碳排放的地点更少,更容易捕捉碳。
B:如果人们相信使用电动汽车有利于环境,他们就愿意为电动汽车多花钱。无关碳排放的问题。
C:汽油副产品生产过程中的碳排放占到了温室气体的一半。迷惑选项,选项想说那传统汽油车使用的汽油产生的碳排放也很多,但是选项并没有对比电产生的碳排放,所以还是不知道谁多谁少。
D:人们相信如果车产生的污染越少,他们开的路程就越多。无关。
E:即使碳排放是温室气体的大头,其他的温室气体危害更大。无关。

选A

2、M城市要求房屋加固、但没要求窗户加固,而打破窗户进来的碎片会造成人受伤,所以这个规定只保护了财产,没有保护人们安全。
问weaken
思考:因果论证,考虑削弱因果联系或他因削弱。

A:M城市对窗户的规定已经比别的城市严格很多了。比较维度无关。
B:最近的飓风没有100年前飓风严重。比较维度无关。
C:风中的碎片是屋顶坍塌造成的。正确,所以房屋加固后,就不会造成碎片,也不会造成人受伤。
D:窗户碎了会导致屋顶坍塌。方向反了,更说明要加固窗户了。
E:规定的应用范围包括老房子和新房子。无关。

选C

作者: 斯麦尔糖    时间: 2021-10-22 18:21
cc
作者: 大月亮cyn    时间: 2021-10-22 19:55
DAY135
1. Weaken A
【P】电池要充电,电是燃烧燃料供应的,这个过程会产生许多碳排放
【C】让M用电车不会减少碳排放
A 碳排放在越集中的地方发生,就越能capture并process(就能减少污染)√
B 许多人称他们愿意多花一点钱买电动车,只要电动车可以减少碳排放 无关
C Petroleum工厂碳排放将近人造的一半的温室气体 无关比较       
D 研究表明人认为车会排放越少的污染,他们就会开越久 增强选项,表明确实不能减少污染
E 尽管碳排放是最多的温室气体,其他气体更有害 无关比较不能削弱
2. Weaken C
【P】:MC在H后修改了建筑形式,加强了屋顶标准但没有加强窗户标准,以减少财产损害。
【C】:这个改变无法减少个人伤害,因为很多人被窗的FB伤到而不是屋顶坍塌       
A M对窗的标准比其他大多数国家要求都高 ,无关比较M和其他国家       
B 无关比较,最近的H没有比一百年前的更严重,不选       
C FB不是来自窗而是屋顶碎片,削弱了,修正屋顶标准就能减少人被FB伤害到       
D 破窗会使得屋顶更容易坍塌,增强了,所以只改变屋顶要求没用,窗更重要       
E 没有讨论repair 而是这个改变能不能减少对人的伤害       
作者: 没有马甲    时间: 2021-10-22 21:28
1.E
题干:
P:electrically-powered
G: reduce co2
Editorial: 计划不行,因为在使用过程中会产生CO2
削弱预测:不转换的话,产生CO2更多,更不好
A. CO2释放的地方数量越少,越容易把CO2搞掉
B.许多人愿意出更高的价格买新车,如果他们认为这样能够保护环境的话。 主观观点,错
C. 在生产过程中产生的CO2占人类工业活动的一半。
D.人们如果认为车会产生更少的废物的话,他们会骑更多
E 尽管co2是最多的greenhouse gases, 其他的气体更加有害。说明现在这个方案更好点。

2 C
题干:
果:damage
因:roof/window
A方案只修理roofs
质疑:window也要修,因为most injuries are caused by flying debris breaking through windows
削弱质疑:不用修window,就修roof就行。
A.许多年了,M国家关于window的建筑标准比其他国家严格
B. 这次的飓风没那么严重
C. 大部分碎片都是由于roof坏了飞进来的 √ roof是根本原因,修理了roof就不用修window了
D.在飓风中,broken window会导致roof坏。加强了,更加说明只修roof不修window不行
E.Code不光适用于房子修理还适用于新房子建造
作者: Dora晴    时间: 2021-11-6 18:11
Day 135
1. weaken题
Batteries have to be charged, and the electricity to charge them is almost certainly going to be produced by the burning of fossil fuels, A process that inevitably Creates carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide as by-products.
-->It is absurd to suppose that getting motorists to switch to electrically-powered automobiles will significantly reduce carbon emissions.
A The smaller the number of locations at which carbon emissions occur, the easier it is to have carbon captured and sequester carbon emissions produced by the process.
B Most people insist that they would be willing to pay more for electrically-powered vehicles if they believed that widespread use of such vehicles would protect the environment.(无关)
C Carbon emissions produced in the manufacture of petroleum by-products constitute nearly one-half of all greenhouse gases produced by human industrial activity.(petroleum by products 不一定是 petroleum)
D Studies have shown that the less pollution people believe automobiles to produce, the longer distances they will tend to drive them. (无关)
E Although carbon emissions are most plentiful greenhouse gases, other such gases are more harmful per unit of weight. (无关)

2. weaken题
since, while many injuries are caused by flying debris breaking through windows, very few are caused by roof collapse or rainwater.
-->the revision will do little to prevent personal injuries
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weaken the argument?
(A) For many years Mardin County's building code has imposed a stricter standard for windows than that imposed by most counties that are frequently struck by hurricanes.(无关比较)
(B) The hurricanes that recently hit Mardin County were not as severe as some hurricanes that have hit there in the past 100 years.(无关比较)
(C) Much of the flying debris carried by the winds of a hurricane is roof material that has become dislodged.
(D) During a hurricane, broken windows in a house cause increased pressure inside the house that can, in turn, cause the roof of the house to become damaged.
(E) Mardin County's building code applies to the repair of houses in addition to the construction of new houses.(无关)

CC




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3