ChaseDream

标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第171天 法律虚拟 [打印本页]

作者: 小白斩鸡    时间: 2021-10-8 21:38
标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第171天 法律虚拟
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享


[attach]262476[/attach]

A famous example of a legal fiction is that of the Balearic island of Minorca. Though Minorca is actually located in the Mediterranean, legal convention situated it within the city of London. The island changed hands frequently after the Romans first claimed it from pirates. Invaded by the Vandals, Moors, and the Kingdom of Aragon, it was attacked by the Turkish and captured by the British navy. Laid siege to by the French, it was then shuttled back and forth between Britain, France, and, in the end, Spain, to which it was permanently ceded in 1802 by the Treaty of Amiens.

The fiction that Minorca lies "in the parish of St. Mary-le-Bow, in the ward of Cheap" has become notorious. In Fabrigas v. Mostyn (1774), Fabrigas, a Minorcan native, challenged Governor Mostyn's right to summarily deport him from the island simply for being a nuisance. In finding for Fabrigas and in awarding him damages, the court affirmed the right to due process for citizens of British colonies. The court's decision depended on the legal fiction that Minorca was part of London.

A 1918 report on the case frames the decision as denying "the claim of the strong to dominate the weak for their own safety merely by virtue of their superior strength" and refusing Mostyn's assumption that "the people of the dependencies were to be considered not as ends in themselves but as a means to the ends of the dominant race." Guaranteeing a measure of civil rights in a colonized territory and protecting against abuses of power which had led to the arrest, imprisonment, and deportation of subjects, the landmark case was framed in "momentous words in which there was once for all secured to the native of a dependency the same access to the ordinary courts as a native of Britain."

The legal fiction that Minorca was located in London therefore went far toward increasing Minorcans' civil liberties,but it still did not go far enough. It liberated a set of people from a tyrannical local government by forcing government officials to be more just and humane, but it did little to challenge the British Empire's power to colonize in the first place. In restricting but not abolishing colonial power, the legal fiction of Minorcan jurisdiction both legitimated colonial dependency and protected dependent citizens. This was equally true of other legal fictions employed by the British Empire.
1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of Fabrigas v. Mostyn?
A. It had little effect on the lives of Minorcans.
B. It was one result of the Treaty of Amiens.
C. It did not actually occur.
D. It involved an inhabitant and an official of Minorca.
E. It was later modified in 1918.


2. The passage suggests that, if the legal fiction described in paragraph 2 were not applicable, which of the following would be true?
A. The legal rights of Londoners would take precedence over the legal rights of Minorcans.
B. Minorca would no longer have been a British colony.
C. The court would not have been able to extend the rights of Londoners to Minorcans.
D. Colonies other than Minorca would have lost the civil rights they were already entitled to.
E. Britain's right to expand its empire by treaty would no longer apply.

3. Were this passage to continue, the next paragraph would likely focus on
A. additional details about the 1918 report on Fabrigas v. Mostyn
B. an analysis of how other legal fictions functioned within colonial contexts
C. a narrative about what happened to Mostyn after the case involving him was resolved
D. further geographical information about the island of Minorca
E. the ways in which imperial power was administered in the London capital


4. The 1918 report on Fabrigas v. Mostyn calls its words "momentous" because
A. it marked a historic acquisition of judicial access
B. it was written in language that is difficult to understand
C. it represented a crisis in legal history
D. it regarded Minorcans as weak and dominated
E. it challenged the British Empire's colonial power


参考答案:[hide=d30]DCBA[/hide]

作者: jenifferyue    时间: 2021-10-9 22:34
DCEE

第一段 说了个法院判决故事 一个平民胜诉了,官员败诉
第二段  主要讲了一个1918 report的评论
第三段 讲了上面fiction 的案例,提高了M国人民的自由人权,但并不撼动BRITIAN的POWER
作者: lfengi    时间: 2021-10-10 10:43
D
C
B
E

第一段说介绍最有名的法律虚拟是 Minorca, Minorca岛的历史背景。
第二段:F vs M, 平民F挑战政府M, 法庭依据公民享有英国殖民地权力而决定F胜诉
第三段:1918年的报告否定M
第四段:法律虚拟的影响: 促进了M公民的自由, 但还远远不够。。

作者: 山言寺林    时间: 2021-10-10 11:19
1. 介绍一本小说FM,和legal有关,这本书讲了一个案件,F和court辩论,后来F赢了
2. 1918年一个report对于这个案件的评价
3. 这本小说的意义
DCBE
作者: 黄富贵1926    时间: 2021-10-10 12:34
DEBA
作者: NCse    时间: 2021-10-10 13:41
m
作者: 750Gogogo    时间: 2021-10-10 19:44
DCBA
作者: easion3    时间: 2021-10-10 21:34

作者: hedy1210    时间: 2021-10-10 21:37
Mark一下!               
作者: 斯麦尔糖    时间: 2021-10-11 10:34
Dcba
作者: 大月亮cyn    时间: 2021-10-11 14:33
legal fiction -->Balearic island of Minorca 介绍这个地方
The fiction of Minorca 讲述了一个Fabrigas v. Mostyn  --> The court'sdecision depended on the legal fiction that Minorca was part of London. 点出了这个legal fiction具体内容
A 1918 report ⬆️ 评价了上面这个决定 deny the claim(...) refuse M's assumption(...)
继续说 M的legal fiction went far toward increasing Minorcans' civil liberties, but it still did not go far enough 有缺陷
1. D Fabrigas, a Minorcan native, challenged GovernorMostyn's right
2. C depended on the legal fiction that Minorca was part of London
3. E ‘This was equally true of other legal fictions employed by the British Empire.’ 接?
4. A momentous前的内容 都是 Guarantee a measure of civil rights/ protect against abuses 后文 the same access 感觉A比较合适
作者: clairettt    时间: 2021-10-11 16:01
著名小说,M岛
F挑战M,M公民享有英国殖民地权力
1918报告否认F VS M
获得一部分自由,但没有改变殖民
DCBA
作者: 123ffff    时间: 2021-10-11 21:58
legal fiction例子M岛,M岛历史复杂
fiction1: Fv.M-M是part of London
评价Fv.M-->在殖民地中保护civil rights
肯定了fiction 有liberaty 但是不好的是也保留了殖民地的empire power
DCBA
作者: w627w    时间: 2021-10-12 05:11
Debe
作者: bethann    时间: 2021-10-12 05:56
感谢分享!               
作者: KaylaZZZ    时间: 2021-10-12 12:02
DABA
作者: GGGG了    时间: 2021-10-12 12:32
同意!               
作者: ran.takahashi    时间: 2021-10-13 15:56
ECBA

作者: 断了的弦    时间: 2021-10-13 23:33
dcba
作者: 啊凯啊    时间: 2021-10-14 02:15
EBBE
作者: Titi1126    时间: 2021-10-14 23:34
看一下!               
作者: vivianjy    时间: 2021-10-19 10:34
legal fiction 著名例子:M  
M被殖民管理权变更频繁
FM诉讼案例:基于legal诉讼成功,肯定殖民地公民权利
FM案例报告:裁决保障殖民地公民权利(成功影响)
虽然在M人权自由上成功但是影响有限(转折)

DCBA


作者: Blackui    时间: 2021-10-21 11:12
DBBA
作者: zyycn    时间: 2021-10-22 17:15
主要介绍一个著名的虚拟法律及带来的影响。
P1:M岛是一个典型虚拟法律的例子。虽然它在地中海,但法律上它位于伦敦。介绍它转手的情况。
P2:1774年的诉讼里,法院根据M岛是伦敦的一部分这个虚拟法律进行了判决。
P3:1918年的report对该案的正面评价。
P4:M岛虚拟法律虽然保护了公民权利,但是没有改变英国的殖民权力。

DCBA

作者: GengJyyy    时间: 2021-10-24 17:33
DCBA
1. 最有名的法律虚拟Minorca介绍
2. FM,居民挑战官员的权力
3. 1981年报道评论
4. 这会提高Minorca公民的自由,但远远不够

作者: Erebuslee    时间: 2021-10-28 21:21
1 E
2 B
3 B
4 A

作者: svwma    时间: 2021-11-10 03:47
DCCA




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3