ChaseDream

标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第143天 坐姿与摄影画像 [打印本页]

作者: 小白斩鸡    时间: 2021-8-20 18:36
标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第143天 坐姿与摄影画像
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享

[attach]261754[/attach]

The encounter that a portrait records is most tangibly the sitting itself, which may be brief or extended, collegial or confrontational. Renowned photographer Cartier-Bresson has expressed his passion for portrait photography by characterizing it as “a duel without rules, a delicate rape.” Such metaphors contrast quite sharply with RichardAvedon’s conception of a sitting. While Cartier-Bresson reveals himself as an interloper and opportunist, Avedon confesses—perhaps uncomfortably—to a role as diagnostician and (by implication) psychic healer: not as someone who necessarily transforms his subjects, but as someone who reveals their essential nature. Both photographers, however, agree that the fundamental dynamic in this process lies squarely in the hands of the artist.

A quite-different paradigm has its roots not in confrontation or consultation but in active collaboration between the artist and sitter. This very different kind of relationship was formulated most vividly by William Hazlitt in his essay entitled “On Sitting for One’s Picture” (1823). To Hazlitt, the “bond of connection” between painter and sitter is most like the relationship between two lovers. Hazlitt fleshes out his thesis by recalling the career of Sir Joshua Reynolds. According to Hazlitt, Reynolds’ sitters were meant to enjoy an atmosphere that was both comfortable for them and conducive to the enterprise of the portrait painter, who was simultaneously their host and their contractual employee.


1. The author of the passage quotes Cartier-Bresson (Highlighted) in order to
(A) refute Avedon’s conception of a portrait sitting.
(B) provide one perspective of the portraiture encounter.
(C) support the claim that portrait sittings are, more often than not, confrontational encounters.
(D) show that a portraiture encounter can be either brief or extended.
(E) distinguish a sitting for a photographic portrait from a sitting for a painted portrait.


2. Which of the following characterizations of the portraiture experience as viewed by Avedon is most readily inferable from the passage?
(A) A collaboration
(B) A mutual accommodation
(C) A confrontation
(D) An uncomfortable encounter
(E) A consultation


3. Which of the following best expresses the passage’s main idea?
(A) The success of a portrait depends largely on the relationship between artist and subject.
(B) Portraits, more than most other art forms, provide insight into the artist’s social relationships.
(C) The social aspect of portraiture sitting plays an important part in the sitting’s outcome.
(D) Photographers and painters differ in their views regarding their role in portrait photography.
(E) The paintings of Reynolds provide a record of his success in achieving a social bond with his subjects.


参考答案:


作者: 晝夜幻殺    时间: 2021-8-20 21:09
5555
作者: sssszzzzxccsc    时间: 2021-8-21 10:28
BCD
作者: 就不用昵称了吧    时间: 2021-8-21 16:08
mark
作者: CaryX    时间: 2021-8-21 16:44
Mark一下!               
作者: ccccherry    时间: 2021-8-22 12:16
BEA
作者: d小飞象    时间: 2021-8-22 15:27
Mark一下!               
作者: yu33    时间: 2021-8-24 23:11
BCB
作者: Conlinsanta    时间: 2021-8-25 08:31
bcb
作者: jiajiajiayi    时间: 2021-9-16 14:49
BED
作者: 123ffff    时间: 2021-11-1 16:05
1. portrait和sitting
B的观点--与A相反
但是AB都agree-
2. aritst和sitter的合作,WH(佐证artist和sitter的关系)
E(X-2个观点,一个B的一个A的)
D(X-to a role as diagnostician and (by implication)-E
A
作者: 梦校offer和全奖    时间: 2021-11-6 14:31
文章结构
提出模式1——举例1.1+举例1.2——转折——模式2+举例2.1+举例2.2
文章内容
肖像画的模式1:作画氛围是协商或者对抗——举例:布列松(决斗和强奸)+举例:阿维顿(治疗者与诊断师)—转折:作画掌握在画家手中——模式2:画家与模特之间合作——举例:哈兹里特+举例:雷诺兹爵士
作者的态度或者意图
介绍在画肖像画时画家与模特之间关系模式
反思
-我认为这一篇全军覆没的原因是很多单词不认识,尤其是这些表示态度的单词,比如conducive之类。我也发现在评论类文章中表示态度的单词很重要一定要积累!而且要注意表示态度单词内容的精准性,比如第1题当中的A选项说布列松和阿维顿之间关于肖像的观点矛盾,从原文内容第一段部分来看确实有矛盾(一个是对抗,另外一个是协商),但是文章的最后一句就补充了说两者还有共同点,那么两者之间的观点肯定不是完全的contrast.在总结结构的时候也一直没有想清楚第一段最后一句那个however作用转折说“两者都同意...”有什么作用,现在明白了,作用就是说明布列松和阿维顿之间的观点有差异也有共同点,不是驳斥。
-第2题错的原因是有好几个单词认识,虽然积累词汇很重要,但是我觉得这个题可以通过结构推测出来。问题问“阿维翁所认为肖像作画过程的特征”,定位回原文从内容是看是       “Avedon confesses—perhaps uncomfortably—to a role as diagnostician and (by implication) psychic healer”,我认为很难直接看出“consultation”关系,但是从内容上用排除法很方便。从结构上来看更清晰:第二段开头说“A quite-different paradigm has its roots not in confrontation or consultation but in active collaboration between the artist and sitter. ”从结构上看,第二段很明显要说一种和第一段中模式很不一样(quite different)的模式,所以逻辑上第二段模式有的特点,第一种模式肯定没有。所以看到“not...or”的时候就可以马上反应是第一段模式的特点了,“but...”才是第二种模式的特点。”confrontation”很明显是布列松的特点,那么阿维翁的特点就是“consultation”.
-第三题当时错选的原因是没有理解“social aspect”的意思,解析中说是“社会性”,我觉得可能理解成更直接的“社交作用”会更好理解。整个答案理解成“坐姿肖像画的社交性对作画成果起着很重要的作用”,这里社交性其实就是作画者与模特之间的关系,如果两者之间社交互动很好,比如最后一种模式中的“积极互动”,那么对画的产出有作用。而且“画的产出”可以对应积极互动模式中的例子“to the enterprise of the portrait painter, who was simultaneously their host and their contractual employee.”这句话证明了好的社交性确实可以帮助画家的作画生涯(sitting’s outcome)
作者: Erebuslee    时间: 2021-11-7 14:19
p1 介绍CB与RA两人对肖像摄影师的定位理解(存在差异)+两个人共同认为:肖像摄影过程掌握在艺术家手中
p2 介绍肖像摄影中sitter和artist的关系+起源于一个论文+理论认识是lover关系

1 B
2 E
3 C
作者: svwma    时间: 2021-11-16 12:19
BD-E
D-C


作者: 斯麦尔糖    时间: 2021-11-16 15:52
bcc

作者: adorkablepp    时间: 2021-11-16 23:00
第一段 photographers-fundamental dynamic in the process (rules)
第二段 not in confrontation or consultation but in active collaboration between the artist and sitter
BBC
作者: zyycn    时间: 2021-12-9 11:01
P1:CB和A对于肖像理解的区别,以及他们共同点——都认为由艺术家决定。

P2:新的模式,画家与坐着的人之间的关系不是对抗而是合作。

BED





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3