ChaseDream

标题: 【OG Verbal 2020】 SC89941.01讨论 [打印本页]

作者: IreneGao 时间: 2021-7-30 17:27
标题: 【OG Verbal 2020】 SC89941.01讨论

Proceeding without a definite plan for upcominglabor negotiations, like the firm had agreed to last year, it would surely haveproven to be a disaster in the face of the skilled and resolute oppositioninvolved this time.

A. Proceeding without a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations, like the firm had agreed to last year, it would surely have proven to be a disaster

B. Proceeding without a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations, as the firm agreed last year to do, would surely have proven to be a disaster

C. Going ahead without the presence of a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations, like the firm had agreed last year to do, would surely have proven disastrous

D. To proceed without the presence of a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations, as the firm had agreed to last year, would surely have proven disastrous

E. Going ahead without their having a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations, as they agreed to last year, it would surely have proven to be a disaster for the firm

请教一下这道题里面would have proven to be是个什么时态？和would have proven的区别？OG上面并没有在这个点上做解释，在其他forum上也没有找的类似的讨论。求关注~

作者: 长丝弓 时间: 2021-7-31 18:29
网上查了下，说prove to be与prove的区别不大

楼主，我在CD的备考群里，群里很多和你一样的小伙伴，你加一下小白斩鸡，会有收获：
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1369936-1-1.html

作者: IreneGao 时间: 2021-8-1 10:30

长丝弓发表于 2021-7-31 18:29
网上查了下，说prove to be与prove的区别不大

楼主，我在CD的备考群里，群里很多和你一样的小伙伴，你加一 ...

谢谢~我去看看~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)