ChaseDream
标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第118天 纳米技术 [打印本页]
作者: 小白斩鸡 时间: 2021-7-26 06:30
标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第118天 纳米技术
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案
解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布
报名活动,加微信号killgmat
Nanotechnology -- the use of structures that have unusual properties because of their atomically tiny size – is already in use in more than 300 consumer products, from computers to cosmetics, but like atomic power itself, this new technology holds great promise as well as alarming possibilities. Determining the safety level of products that utilize nanotechnology is the daunting task of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One reason that regulating nanotech products is so challenging is that nanoparticles, though they consist of the same chemicals as traditional products, have physical structures that give them very different properties, and they can enter the body by means other than those used by other small particles.
The actual method by which nanoparticles are created is relevant as well. For example, carbon can be used to create fullerenes, but there is more than one way to manufacture these nanoparticles, and each way leads to a fullerene with different characteristics. \ Because of this, some research has identified fullerenes as anti-oxidants, which are useful for treating cells by neutralizing free radicals, while other research shows fullerenes to be oxidants, which can damage cell membranes. Similarly, nanoparticles show great potential in cleaning up environmental contaminants, but these particles themselves might become nearly intractable long-term pollutants.
Some recent research has been truly alarming. Carbon nanotubes placed directly into the lungs of mice stimulated an immune response that left scar tissue. A similar experiment with a single-walled carbon nanotube soot mixture caused granulomas and lesions in the rats’ lungs, and proved fatal for 15% of the rats. (It should be noted that these experiments involved instilling the nanomaterials into the lungs; more experiments are needed involving inhalation.) Another consideration is that when studying the effects of nanomaterials, more than with typical chemicals, it is not enough to study a nanoparticle in a vacuum; all physical and chemical characteristics have to be microanalyzed by studying a material’s reactivity, solubility, and biological persistence under real world conditions.
Because the costs and benefits of nanotech research are so high, international cooperation among governments and businesses is essential to success. Currently, the U.S. is underfunding research in this field, and this could have calamitous results. The Toxic Substances Control Act is insufficient for covering many of the dangers unique to nanotech materials. Furthermore, not all nations have even created a set of regulations for nanotechnology, also a serious mistake. A product that reaches the market before it has been thoroughly understood could prove harmful to individual users and whole populations that have had only minimal exposure. This could so turn public opinion against nanotechnology that its tantalizing benefits would be indefinitely postponed.
1) Which of the following can be inferred from the passage regarding recent research on nanoparticles?
A) It has been done mostly in a vacuum without consideration for what happens under real world conditions.
B) Further experiments are required to adequately judge particular risks that have been identified.
C) It has been too narrowly focused on older nanoparticles, rather than the newer nanoparticles that will be used in the future.
D) It has created a generally negative sentiment in the general public regarding nanoparticles.
E) It has shown that carbon nanotubes are particularly dangerous in comparison to other types of nanoparticles.
2) Which of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
A) A majority of nations lack the adequate regulations for making nanotechnology safe.
B) Nanotechnology should be banned in the U.S. unless it can be properly regulated by the EPA.
C) Successful research in nanotechnology depends on cooperation among governments and businesses.
D) The way nanoparticles are formed is the most important element in determining its safety.
E) The potential benefits of nanotechnology outweigh the potential risks.
3) According to the passage, which of the following contributes to the complexity of regulating nanomaterials?
A) The EPA does not have the proper funding with which to create these materials.
B) More than one method can be used to create a nanoparticle.
C) Nations have conflicting standards concerning the safety of nanotech products.
D) Public opinion is currently divided regarding the desirability of products made with nanomaterials.
E) Products that contain nanomaterials are already being used by individuals and businesses.
参考答案:
作者: Blanche会努力 时间: 2021-7-26 09:56
ABB
作者: CaryX 时间: 2021-7-26 11:51
mark
作者: Ariafox 时间: 2021-7-26 13:52
1讲纳米科技被广泛运用,有好处也有危险,讲了一个纳米particle是难规范原因
2nanoparticles因为多变性/多样性可能对环境污染有好处也有可能自身变成长期污染
3举了最近一个实验好像不太好,负面的,还说了其实在实验室研究很局限,在真实世界中更复杂,要分析的更多
4讲了针对纳米技术的研究局限性很大比较贵,很多法律也管不到他,在没有彻底了解它就开始被运用了,感觉作者对它态度比较负面
aab
作者: vincentm9426 时间: 2021-7-26 16:17
看一下!
作者: ChloeD 时间: 2021-7-26 16:42
纳米技术应用及管控法规的局限
管控难的关联原因包括:生产方法多,都产生不同副产品
纳米技术最新的研究及其效果评估
民间研究是主力- 管控很重要
acb
作者: KaylaZZZ 时间: 2021-7-26 22:21
B C E
作者: 南瓜星人 时间: 2021-7-26 22:32
AEB
作者: Blackui 时间: 2021-7-27 00:13
BDB
作者: Alan-Endless 时间: 2021-7-27 00:28
Mark一下!
作者: iamvv 时间: 2021-7-27 17:43
ACC
作者: hedy1210 时间: 2021-7-27 19:08
thk!
作者: 浪浪清 时间: 2021-7-27 20:44
bcb
作者: 山言寺林 时间: 2021-7-27 22:11
1. 介绍背景:纳米技术现在被广泛应用,提出它存在优点的同时也存在威胁,提出问题在于衡量它的安全性是困难的,开始解释原因,其中一个原因是因为它的物理状态决定它的性质太多样化
2. 另一个原因是它生成的途径很多,有好处也有坏处
3. 提出一些新的研究(负面态度),结果证明纳米会对健康有害,另一个点是现在的研究都在vacuum环境,没有考虑环境因素
4. 强调意义:对纳米的研究需要国际政府的合作,美国做的还不够,并且很多国家还没有形成规范,不经彻底研究就投入市场是需要关心的一个问题
ACB
作者: yangzezczc 时间: 2021-7-28 15:25
!!!!!!
作者: xyy12138 时间: 2021-7-28 16:39
BAB
作者: sssszzzzxccsc 时间: 2021-7-28 19:22
ACB
作者: 傑佛瑞 时间: 2021-7-28 21:58
看一下!
作者: Sylvia_Ah 时间: 2021-7-28 23:05
第一段:N被限制的大致原因
第二段:类比carbon产生f,谈一下N的性质
第三段:接着第二段,说N很alarming,因为有害;指出了研究不足之处(真空不现实)(注意是some不是all)
第四段:call for cooperation,呼吁public重视N的缺点
ACA
作者: Fnc001 时间: 2021-7-29 20:12
ACB
作者: lfengi 时间: 2021-8-4 23:46
B C C
作者: ccccherry 时间: 2021-8-5 09:06
ACB
作者: 上780 时间: 2021-8-6 10:15
Mark一下!
作者: jiajiajiayi 时间: 2021-8-7 14:07
BCB
作者: Mavis1017 时间: 2021-8-10 00:22
看一下!
作者: 哎惢嘶 时间: 2023-11-2 10:54
纳米科技,有很多种类形式,很难管理,因为种类太多了,结构有点区别,功能差别也很大。所以EPA很难管理。纳米材料有很多用处,但是实验表明也有很大风险,并不确定安全,甚至有可能带来伤害和污染。讲了两个实验。各国对纳米的管理也规范也不健全,不统一。
P1 nanotech
- Many uses>>great promise & alarming possibilities
- Safety level >>reason: structures & properties, means of entering body
P2 create & use
- Many ways >> fullerene>> different characteristics
○ Some anti-ox>>treating cells
○ Oxidants>> damage
○ Cleaning environment >>pollutants
P3 alarming research
- Carbon nanotubes//lungs
○ Immune response>>scar tissue
- Carbon nanotube soot mixture
○ Granulomas & lesions >> fatal
- Research in vacuum >> not enough>>should be under real world conditions
P4 Cost & bene >> cooperation among gov & buz>>success
- US-underfunding
- TSCA-insufficient
- Not all nations create regulations
- Product-only minimal exposure>>could turn public opinion against
作者: andyhhhh 时间: 2023-11-3 08:24
大意:奈米科技已開始廣泛使用,但其實很危險,應該好好監管
態度:提倡加強監管
一、背景:奈米科技興盛,但監管不夠
二、原因:型態多變,難以掌握
三、舉例:實驗說明奈米科技危險
四、結論:政府與企業應該合作監管
A
C
B
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |