ChaseDream

标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第54天 二氧化碳清除战略 [打印本页]

作者: ChaseDream元元    时间: 2021-5-23 20:04
标题: 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第54天 二氧化碳清除战略
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat


Reducing atmospheric CO2 by a deliberate carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy is one option being considered for combating global warming caused by the current high levels of atmospheric CO2. Before implementation can occur, it is important to have a reference goal for a planned reduction of the global CO2 concentration against which any specific strategy can be assessed. Scientists agree that a modest aim would be to seek to reduce the CO2 concentration by 50 ppm, which is the equivalent of removing 400 gigatons of CO2,or an average of 4 GtCO2/yr over 100 years. At this substantial level of reduction, it is still expected that dangerous levels of atmospheric CO2 would persist.

Even in the limiting case in which all emissions of CO2 cease, it is not straightforward to estimate how much CO2 must be removed from the atmosphere to lower its content by 4 GtCO2 annually. During any period of zero emissions but no CDR implementation, the atmospheric CO2 concentration will fall. Ocean currents continually bring deep ocean water to the surface that was last at the surface hundreds of years before, when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was at its preindustrial value. As equilibrium is established at the ocean surface between CO2 in the air and dissolved in the ocean, such ocean water scavenges CO2 from the atmosphere. So, with a time scale of hundreds of years, some atmospheric CO2 reduction is done naturally (at the expense of growing acidity in the ocean).

The same requirement for equilibrium at the ocean surface governs the reverse effect that would happen if the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere were lowered someday by deliberate removal of CO2. There would be an immediate compensating transfer of CO2 from the ocean to the atmosphere, as a result of which it would be necessary to remove more than one unit of CO2 from the atmosphere to reduce the atmospheric CO2 content by one unit. Forest responses add complications, as do deep ocean currents. Today, the combined effect of ocean and land CO2 “sinks” results, for a time-scale measured in decades, in roughly half of the CO2 remaining in the atmosphere that was emitted to the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuel, but the future magnitudes of these sinks are uncertain.



1. Which of the following is listed as a natural phenomenon that would require a CDR strategy to remove CO2by an amount greater than its desired CO2 reduction target?
A) the presence of land CO2 “sinks”
B) the presence of ocean CO2 “sinks”
C) equilibrium at the ocean surface
D) deep ocean water moving to the surface
E) scavenging of CO2 by the ocean surface


2. The author discusses ocean and land CO2 “sinks” in order to:
A) explain how much of the CO2 emitted by the burning of fossil fuels remains in the atmosphere
B) highlight how uncertain the future is regarding the magnitude of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels
C) highlight the challenges in determining natural effects on CO2 levels when implementing a CDR strategy
D) clarify why it would be necessary to remove more than one unit of CO2 from the atmosphere to reduce the atmospheric CO2 content by one unit
E) emphasize that there are many natural means by which CO2 is removed from the atmosphere.


3. The author uses the content in the parentheses at end of the 2nd paragraph to:
A) provide additional information about how the natural process of atmospheric CO2 reduction occurs
B) emphasize the importance of a negative effect that would result from a natural process
C) highlight one result from the many natural processes related to CO2 removal
D) present a negative effect that is not directly related to the primary purpose of the paragraph
E) show the importance of natural removal of CO2 in the atmosphere


4. All of the following are discussed in the passage EXCEPT:
(A) details on how CO2 will be removed from the atmosphere by a CDR strategy
(B) difficulties in measuring the effects of a CDR strategy on CO2 reduction
(C) increases in atmospheric CO2 levels resulting from natural processes
(D) decreases in atmospheric CO2 result resulting from natural processes
(E) the risk of high atmospheric levels of CO2 in the atmosphere


参考答案:


作者: pluto1    时间: 2021-5-24 09:25
ECAA
作者: LouisTan    时间: 2021-5-24 14:41
ABDC
作者: 速水愛媛    时间: 2021-5-24 14:47
C C D A
作者: Ethan_dai    时间: 2021-5-24 17:01
C B B A
作者: __Dy    时间: 2021-5-24 17:06
CBDA
作者: 维多利亚每天都很饿    时间: 2021-5-24 19:57
BCDE
作者: 英语爱我我爱英语    时间: 2021-5-24 19:59
CBDE
作者: YY-Y    时间: 2021-5-24 21:25
CCDA
作者: yyking625    时间: 2021-5-25 11:52
CCDA

作者: liangabc    时间: 2021-5-25 14:25
感谢分享!               
作者: Syvlia    时间: 2021-5-25 14:44
CBDA
作者: Ivory2020    时间: 2021-5-25 17:51
同意!               
作者: Zachary==    时间: 2021-5-25 20:36
看一下!               
作者: RxxMewo    时间: 2021-5-25 22:48
ACDA
作者: _Salaxy_    时间: 2021-5-26 06:08
CBDC
作者: famerica    时间: 2021-5-28 14:58
dbda
作者: ccccherry    时间: 2021-5-28 22:30
ABDE
作者: CaryX    时间: 2021-6-1 11:05
ECDE
作者: yutingw    时间: 2021-6-4 16:55
看一下!               
作者: 断了的弦    时间: 2021-6-4 17:24
cbbc
作者: sjj加油    时间: 2021-6-6 10:36
cbca
作者: Miahegogogo    时间: 2021-6-6 19:27
CBBA
有一个二氧化碳清除计划(CDR)和具体目标
其实自然状态下海洋可以吸收一部分二氧化碳,但会使得海洋的酸度增加
当空气中的二氧化碳含量不高时,会有一个平衡现象,海洋会向空气释放二氧化碳,森林也有一样的效果,使得未来需要清除的二氧化碳量难以估计
看了下答案感觉确实是CCDA比较make sense..., 第三题使得海洋的酸度增加其实作者并没有highlight他的importance, 只是指出了一个在海洋清除过量二氧化碳过程中会产生的一个意外结果,而第二题的话C选项更符合作者的意图,B选项就是单纯的重复了文章内容了

作者: 690387114    时间: 2021-6-11 11:23
ccca 正答CCDA错题解析:题2CD纠结,但这个例子是在核心论述“difficult to measure”下的

作者: jiajiajiayi    时间: 2021-7-16 16:00
CBDA
作者: 大月亮cyn    时间: 2021-11-5 20:37
Day54 DCDA
1. C  The same requirement for equilibrium at the ocean surface governs the reverse effect that would happen if the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere were lowered someday by deliberate removal of CO2.
作者: Leilanico    时间: 2023-7-2 20:01
文章类型:观点陈述型文章/事实描述型文章
写作目的:作者对CDR(Carbon dioxyde removal )计划的评价和看法,谈到了preindustrial的自然环境如何吸收清除大气中的二氧化碳的,CDR对目前使用石油燃烧而排放的过量二氧化碳是否有效果而质疑(uncertain)。

第一段:CDR计划需要评估。专家担心modest aim 清除计划也会让大气中危险水平含量的二氧化碳滞留。

第二段:在preindustrial时代几百年前,自然环境下海洋通过洋流+将深海水流向海面的方式吸收二氧化碳。(可能会有海洋变酸的代价)

第三段:森林增加了复杂性。ocean+land 二氧化碳sinks ,但是因为石油燃烧而排放的二氧化碳导致CDR计划的成功性变得不确定。

作者: 眯眼笑    时间: 2023-10-18 20:16
第一段:提出方法,用CDR去减少大气中的二氧化碳;
第二段:方法存在问题,因为不知道究竟多少的二氧化碳要被除掉。如果没有人类干预的话,大气中的二氧化碳是会降低的。海洋会吸收一部分二氧化碳,但也伴随着海洋酸度增加。
第三段:反过来,海洋也会补充二氧化碳进大气,所以人类可能要吸收到更多单位的二氧化碳。树林也是一个复杂的难题。海洋和陆地二氧化碳碳汇的综合效应导致了几乎一半的二氧化碳留在了大气中,而这些是燃烧化石燃料所释放的。未来这些汇总的规模是不确定的。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3