ChaseDream

标题: 【OG20-P799-831题】with伴随关系还是宾语从句的平行并列 [打印本页]

作者: 深高金的zkk 时间: 2020-9-1 14:48
标题: 【OG20-P799-831题】with伴随关系还是宾语从句的平行并列
Although the rise in the Producer Price Index was greater than expected, most analysts agreed that the index was unlikely to continue going up and that inflation remained essentially under control.

A.that the index was unlikely to continue going up and that inflation remained
B.that it was unlikely for the index continuing to go up and for inflation to remain
C.that the index was unlikely to continue to go up, with inflation to remain
D.on the unlikelihood that the index would continue going up and that inflation remained
E.on the unlikelihood that the index would continue to go up and for inflation to remain
问题1：正确答案是A。请问为什么C选项不对呢？with表示index停止增长之后的伴随也没有错误呀...

问题2：此外，学渣还想问个语法点。C选项的SVO, with ... 在逗号之后的介词短语，在句末只能做状语嘛？那修饰的是前面的整个句子，还是句子里面的形容词或者动词呢？
这让我联想到了另外一个题目
Although some had accused Smith, the firm’s network manager, of negligence when the crucial data went missing, the CEO defused a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault.

A.a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault

B.a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault

C.a situation, which was quite tense, by stating publicly that Smith was not responsible for the debacle

D.a quite tense situation with a public statement about the debacle not being Smith’s fault

E.a quite tense situation by publicly stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault
其中的B选项：by前的逗号必须有，这个逗号不是随意的，它有它的必要可能功能。表明by这个介词短语是修饰主句的状语，否则它也可以被看作是修饰定语从句的状语了。有了这个逗号就明确地表明by是修饰主句而不是定语从句的状语了。

作者: 长丝弓 时间: 2020-9-1 21:54
楼主，gmatLA是这么分析的：C选项：with inflation to remain是一个独立主格，作为状语修饰动作“go up”。但逻辑上来说，“指数不增长”和“通货膨胀保持可控”是并列的独立的两件事，不能用后者去修饰前者，这是不合理的。

作者: IreneGao 时间: 2021-8-7 14:49

长丝弓发表于 2020-9-1 21:54
楼主，gmatLA是这么分析的：C选项：with inflation to remain是一个独立主格，作为状语修饰动作“go up”。 ...

我觉得让人感到疑惑的就是，Producer Price Index恰好是inflation的一种反映，所以逻辑上因为inflation被控制住了所以体现出来PPI不会再上涨应该也是说得通的？这么说的话问题在于with表示“因为”的表意不够明确？

作者: 吾铜wt 时间: 2023-9-16 17:56

长丝弓发表于 2020-9-1 21:54
楼主，gmatLA是这么分析的：C选项：with inflation to remain是一个独立主格，作为状语修饰动作“go up”。 ...

这道题我最大的疑惑就是，他们为什么是并列的独立的两件事，而不能是因果关系= =因为inflation被控制了，所以PPI指数也不会再上涨了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)