ChaseDream

标题: 求助一道og21 新题 [打印本页]

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-5-14 16:03
标题: 求助一道og21 新题
In the 1960s, surveys of Florida's alligator population indicated that the population was dwindling rapidly. Hunting alligators was banned. By the early 1990s, the alligator population had recovered, and restricted hunting was allowed. Over the course of the 1990s, reports of alligators appearing on golf courses and lawns increased dramatically. Therefore, in spite of whatever alligator hunting went on, the alligator population must have increased significantly over the decade of the 1990s.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

                                                      A
The human population of Florida increased significantly during the 1990s.


                                                      E
Most of the sightings of alligators on golf courses and lawns in the 1990s occurred at times at which few people were present on those golf courses and lawns.

哪位大神能否解释一下这道题 E是怎么排出的？不是很明白此题 A选项是对的。  万分感谢！

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-5-14 19:27
有大神明白这道题吗？万分感谢

作者: 断了的弦 时间: 2020-5-15 13:17
reports 增多了？

作者: deadandgone 时间: 2020-5-16 03:35
天啊为什么会选A？人多了不一定就都去golf啊，不能weaken啊……

作者: 小小豆豆酱 时间: 2020-5-16 11:34
这道题是p：人们看到鳄鱼会报告，报告看到鳄鱼的变多 C: 鳄鱼数量变多
A项：人数变多所以报告变多，不代表鳄鱼数量变多，削弱（鳄鱼数量变少了，被看到的多了，依旧可以报告变多）
E项：大多数的sightings发生在人少的时候（和鳄鱼数量无关）

作者: Thisis呱呱小 时间: 2020-6-1 19:20
你好，请问OG21的资料怎么找，我找了好久都不知道在哪里。谢谢你

作者: Juno_Dai 时间: 2020-6-3 22:03
很简单啊，E是错误选项直接排除掉啊，E重复前提了 E通过提供详细信息的方式重复了前提前提就是鳄鱼在这两个地方的出现增多而E的意思是详细告诉你这个增多是个什么表现——哦~原来是在人们不在的时候鳄鱼更多的出现在这两个地方而A选项属于提供他因，所以是正选。这道题结论是解释鳄鱼为啥在这两个地方增多，原文的结论是因为鳄鱼数量增加了（尽管有狩猎的存在） A选项说是因为人类数量增多了，言下之意是你侵犯了人家的领域这是另一个原因，自然原来提供的原因也就被削弱了

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-6-8 15:57

小小豆豆酱发表于 2020-5-16 11:34
这道题是p：人们看到鳄鱼会报告，报告看到鳄鱼的变多 C: 鳄鱼数量变多
A项：人数变多所以报告变多，不代表 ...

万分感谢

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-6-8 15:58

Juno_Dai 发表于 2020-6-3 22:03
很简单啊，E是错误选项直接排除掉啊，E重复前提了 E通过提供详细信息的方式重复了前提前提就是鳄鱼在这两 ...

万分感谢

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-6-8 15:58

Thisis呱呱小发表于 2020-6-1 19:20
你好，请问OG21的资料怎么找，我找了好久都不知道在哪里。谢谢你

我是在百度上看到的这道题

作者: mnmicy 时间: 2020-6-8 15:59

Thisis呱呱小发表于 2020-6-1 19:20
你好，请问OG21的资料怎么找，我找了好久都不知道在哪里。谢谢你

我是在百度上看到的这道题

作者: jiajiajiayi 时间: 2021-1-23 23:54

Thisis呱呱小发表于 2020-6-1 19:20
你好，请问OG21的资料怎么找，我找了好久都不知道在哪里。谢谢你

你还需要吗？我可以发给你

作者: qye6 时间: 2022-11-15 11:31

Juno_Dai 发表于 2020-6-3 22:03
很简单啊，E是错误选项直接排除掉啊，E重复前提了 E通过提供详细信息的方式重复了前提前提就是鳄鱼在这两 ...

Farmer: Several people in the past few years have claimed to have seen a mountain lioni n the suburban outskirts—the latest just last month—and, while mountain lions were thought to have been driven from this entire region about twenty years ago, there is no reason for the people who reported seeing a mountain lion to have deliberately concocted a false report. Therefore, local wildlife managers should begin to urgently address the mountain lion's presence.

Which of the following would, if true, most seriously weaken the farmer's argument?

A.    Farmers in the suburban outskirts mostly raise cattle and hogs, which when fully grown are generally not attacked by mountain lions.

B.    Mountain lions are dissimilar in size and color to other wild animals found near the suburban outskirts.

C.    No person who claimed to have seen a mountain lion had anyone else with them at the purported sighting.
你好这题和楼主的题类似都是sighting 您可以解释一下为什么这题选c吗？

作者: starry0328 时间: 2023-7-26 15:10

qye6 发表于 2022-11-15 11:31
Farmer: Several people in the past few years have claimed to have seen a mountain lioni n the su ...

我也想问这道题，这两道题的选项都好类似呀，友友明白这道题和楼主问的题目的区别了吗~

作者: 虾米zz 时间: 2023-12-16 21:49
mountain lion的考点貌似是 false report。所以考察方向不一样:
alligators 削弱的是为什么report梳理增多 -> 因为人多了。
mountain lion 削弱的是为什么有reoprt，但是实际上没有狮子 -> 因为每次都是一个人，看错了没人纠正

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)